Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach

From	Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach
Date	2015-11-26 09:10 +0100
Message-ID	<qyZMS-2jO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qyQqe-3L8-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 08:01:17PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check to cpuset cgroups, where it belongs.
> This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY to Intel CAT cgroups.

Looks that's the right place. I tried intel_rdt subsystem at least it
doesn't have this restriction anymore (all the tasks can be moved out
of the default group), hence:

Reviewed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>

Chao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to  cpuset_can_attach Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> - 2015-11-25 23:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code  to cpuset_can_attach Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-26 09:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code  to cpuset_can_attach Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 13:10 +0100
    [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to  cpuset_can_attach (v2) Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> - 2015-11-26 23:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code  to cpuset_can_attach (v2) Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:50 +0100

csiph-web