Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1274007 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-20 13:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-22 16:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] Fix a memory leak in scsi_host_dev_release() Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-11-20 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Fix a memory leak in scsi_host_dev_release() Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2015-11-22 16:10 +0100
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 13:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix a memory leak in scsi_host_dev_release() |
| Message-ID | <qwSw9-6Id-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Bart, the memory leak looks real, and your fix looks corret, but I still don't like it. I think it's reasonable for SCSI to assume that the final put_device fully frees the struct device including the name pointer that is assigned entirely behind the back of the caller. So I think the fix for this probably should be in the driver core. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qxEr7-5wP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1274007 |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:49:42AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 11/20/2015 03:52 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >the memory leak looks real, and your fix looks corret, but I still > >don't like it. > > > >I think it's reasonable for SCSI to assume that the final put_device > >fully frees the struct device including the name pointer that is > >assigned entirely behind the back of the caller. > > > >So I think the fix for this probably should be in the driver core. > > Hello Christoph, > > Thanks for the feedback. However, I'm not sure this can be fixed by > modifying the driver core. If scsi_host_remove() is not called the SCSI core > doesn't call put_device(&shost->shost_dev). I will post a second version of > this patch that ensures that the SCSI core always calls > put_device(&shost->shost_dev). Oh, I see. The release method is called on shost_gendev, but the name that needs to be freed is in shost_dev. I take my comment on the core back. Let's get this patch in for now and see if we can do something about the creative driver model (ab-)use for struct Scsi_Host in the long run. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web