Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1273890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-20 10:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-30 13:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: 74xx: fix a possible NULL dereference Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-20 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: 74xx: fix a possible NULL dereference Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-11-30 13:10 +0100
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 10:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: 74xx: fix a possible NULL dereference |
| Message-ID | <qwQb0-5kb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, LABBE Corentin
<clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> wrote:
> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
> dereference later at line 132:
> priv->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data;
>
> Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324141)
This is a DT-only driver, hence this cannot happen?
> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c
> index 6ed7c0f..6b18682 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c
> @@ -113,13 +113,16 @@ static int mmio_74xx_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
>
> static int mmio_74xx_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> - of_match_device(mmio_74xx_gpio_ids, &pdev->dev);
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> struct mmio_74xx_gpio_priv *priv;
> struct resource *res;
> void __iomem *dat;
> int err;
>
> + of_id = of_match_device(mmio_74xx_gpio_ids, &pdev->dev);
> + if (!of_id)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!priv)
> return -ENOMEM;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-30 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qAvrk-3rH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1273890 |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, LABBE Corentin > <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> wrote: >> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer >> dereference later at line 132: >> priv->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data; >> >> Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324141) > > This is a DT-only driver, hence this cannot happen? Yeah I said the same in comment to some other patch in the series. But it doesn't hurt much either. Coccinelle has no clue about deeper semantics, just shallow semantics. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web