Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1267034 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()  removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-11 09:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()  removal Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-13 21:20 +0100

#1267034 — Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal

Thomas,

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:23:29 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the
> > right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is
> > a (hopefully) better long term solution.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I'll go over the proposed solution tomorrow afternoon (I'm
> traveling/conferencing...)

Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we
implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing
IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution.

Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications
to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach
in mind.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1269194

Thomas,

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we
> implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution.
> 
> Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications
> to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach
> in mind.

I'm not sure if we really need all that muck if we can just rely on
that flag. I don't see the extra value, but you might have something
in mind which does not jump into my face right now.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web