Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal

From	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal
Date	2015-11-13 21:20 +0100
Message-ID	<qusZd-2Cc-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qlF9g-4YG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlFLX-5WV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlFLX-5WV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlKLD-4Jw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qtyWZ-hH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas,

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Have you had the time to consider the proposed solution? For 4.3 we
> implemented the quick work-around that consisted in clearing
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN, but it's probably not a very good long-term solution.
> 
> Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like to see some modifications
> to the proposed approach, or if you have a totally different approach
> in mind.

I'm not sure if we really need all that muck if we can just rely on
that flag. I don't see the extra value, but you might have something
in mind which does not jump into my face right now.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()  removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-11 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags()  removal Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-13 21:20 +0100

csiph-web