Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1259643 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-30 18:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-02 07:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2015-10-30 18:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-10-31 17:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2015-11-02 07:50 +0100
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-30 18:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio |
| Message-ID | <qplvk-8A-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
ipchain__fprintf_graph() should pass non-NULL callchain node when
printing remaining entries. Otherwise it'll segfault since it tries to
access to the node to calculate the value.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
index 4a7b007c2a87..2104b09d41a8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static size_t __callchain__fprintf_graph(FILE *fp, struct rb_root *root,
size_t ret = 0;
int i;
uint entries_printed = 0;
+ int cumul_count = 0;
remaining = total_samples;
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ static size_t __callchain__fprintf_graph(FILE *fp, struct rb_root *root,
child = rb_entry(node, struct callchain_node, rb_node);
cumul = callchain_cumul_hits(child);
remaining -= cumul;
+ cumul_count += callchain_cumul_counts(child);
/*
* The depth mask manages the output of pipes that show
@@ -141,12 +143,21 @@ static size_t __callchain__fprintf_graph(FILE *fp, struct rb_root *root,
if (callchain_param.mode == CHAIN_GRAPH_REL &&
remaining && remaining != total_samples) {
+ struct callchain_node rem_node = {
+ .hit = remaining,
+ };
if (!rem_sq_bracket)
return ret;
+ if (callchain_param.value == CCVAL_COUNT) {
+ rem_node.count = child->parent->children_count - cumul_count;
+ if (rem_node.count <= 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
new_depth_mask &= ~(1 << (depth - 1));
- ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, NULL, &rem_hits, depth,
+ ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, &rem_node, &rem_hits, depth,
new_depth_mask, 0, total_samples,
left_margin);
}
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-31 17:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio |
| Message-ID | <qpH2N-50U-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1259643 |
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:15:38AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
>
> if (!rem_sq_bracket)
> return ret;
>
> + if (callchain_param.value == CCVAL_COUNT) {
> + rem_node.count = child->parent->children_count - cumul_count;
> + if (rem_node.count <= 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> new_depth_mask &= ~(1 << (depth - 1));
> - ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, NULL, &rem_hits, depth,
> + ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, &rem_node, &rem_hits, depth,
> new_depth_mask, 0, total_samples,
> left_margin);
this looks like being introduced within your patchset in patch:
perf callchain: Abstract callchain print function
shouldn't it get fixed in there?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 07:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/5] perf report: Fix segfault on -g fractral with --stdio |
| Message-ID | <qqh6h-20g-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1260019 |
Hi Jiri,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:15:38AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> >
> > if (!rem_sq_bracket)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + if (callchain_param.value == CCVAL_COUNT) {
> > + rem_node.count = child->parent->children_count - cumul_count;
> > + if (rem_node.count <= 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > new_depth_mask &= ~(1 << (depth - 1));
> > - ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, NULL, &rem_hits, depth,
> > + ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, &rem_node, &rem_hits, depth,
> > new_depth_mask, 0, total_samples,
> > left_margin);
>
> this looks like being introduced within your patchset in patch:
> perf callchain: Abstract callchain print function
>
> shouldn't it get fixed in there?
Right. I'll move it to the commit
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web