Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1236324 > unrolled thread

[RFC] regulator: Propagate voltage changes to supply regulators

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [RFC] regulator: Propagate voltage changes to supply regulators Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-09-30 16:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC] regulator: Propagate voltage changes to supply regulators Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200

#1236324 — [RFC] regulator: Propagate voltage changes to supply regulators

Until now changing the voltage of a regulator only ever effected the
regulator itself, but never its supplies. It's a common pattern though
to put LDO regulators behind switching regulators. The switching
regulators efficiently drop the input voltage but have a high ripple on
their output. The output is then cleaned up by the LDOs. For higher
energy efficiency the voltage drop at the LDOs should be minimized. This
patch adds support for such a scenario.

A new min_dropout_uv field is added to struct regulator_desc. Regulators
can specify the minimun dropout voltage they need for proper function
here. Now when the voltage is changed on a regulator the regulator core
makes sure that
a) before increasing the voltage on the current regulator the supply
   provides at least the desired voltage plus the minimum dropout
b) after decreasing the voltage on the current regulator the supply
   is optimized to the minimum required voltage within the needs of
   the consumers of the supply.

Calculating the optimum voltage for the supply regulator is a bit tricky
since the simple approach of just adding the desired minimum voltage and
the minimum dropout is not enough. It may happen that the current
regulator does not support the desired minimum voltage, but only a
higher one. This means we have to figure out the lowest voltage
supported by the regulator that is higher than the minimum desired
voltage. The regulator_get_voltage_floor introduced with this series
does
exactly that.

This is a first RFC for this series which probably has some rough edges,
but it was already tested successfully on a Phytec PFLA02 i.MX6 board.

Please review, any input welcome.

Sascha

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1236333

Please do not answer to this series, it contains a wrong address for the
linux-arm-kernel list. I just resent this with the correct addres. Sorry
for the noise.

Sascha

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Until now changing the voltage of a regulator only ever effected the
> regulator itself, but never its supplies. It's a common pattern though
> to put LDO regulators behind switching regulators. The switching
> regulators efficiently drop the input voltage but have a high ripple on
> their output. The output is then cleaned up by the LDOs. For higher
> energy efficiency the voltage drop at the LDOs should be minimized. This
> patch adds support for such a scenario.
> 
> A new min_dropout_uv field is added to struct regulator_desc. Regulators
> can specify the minimun dropout voltage they need for proper function
> here. Now when the voltage is changed on a regulator the regulator core
> makes sure that
> a) before increasing the voltage on the current regulator the supply
>    provides at least the desired voltage plus the minimum dropout
> b) after decreasing the voltage on the current regulator the supply
>    is optimized to the minimum required voltage within the needs of
>    the consumers of the supply.
> 
> Calculating the optimum voltage for the supply regulator is a bit tricky
> since the simple approach of just adding the desired minimum voltage and
> the minimum dropout is not enough. It may happen that the current
> regulator does not support the desired minimum voltage, but only a
> higher one. This means we have to figure out the lowest voltage
> supported by the regulator that is higher than the minimum desired
> voltage. The regulator_get_voltage_floor introduced with this series
> does
> exactly that.
> 
> This is a first RFC for this series which probably has some rough edges,
> but it was already tested successfully on a Phytec PFLA02 i.MX6 board.
> 
> Please review, any input welcome.
> 
> Sascha
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web