Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1234974 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/4] MIPS: ath79: Add USB support on the TL-WR1043ND

Started byKishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
First post2015-09-29 13:20 +0200
Last post2015-09-29 13:20 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/4] MIPS: ath79: Add USB support on the TL-WR1043ND Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2015-09-29 13:20 +0200

#1234974 — Re: [PATCH 0/4] MIPS: ath79: Add USB support on the TL-WR1043ND

FromKishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Date2015-09-29 13:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] MIPS: ath79: Add USB support on the TL-WR1043ND
Message-ID<qe16V-4Sg-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

On Wednesday 09 September 2015 07:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 September 2015 16:14:59 Alban wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:20:42 +0200
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 01 September 2015 17:23:10 Alban Bedel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> this serie add a driver for the USB phy on the ATH79 SoCs and enable the
>>>> USB port on the TL-WR1043ND. The phy controller is really trivial as it
>>>> only use reset lines.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is this a common thing to have? If other PHY devices are like this, we
>>> could instead add a simple generic PHY driver that just asserts all
>>> its reset lines in the order as provided, rather than making this a
>>> hardware specific driver that ends up getting copied several times.
>>
>> I don't know how common it is. However I agree that a simple driver that
>> can start a clock and toggle a few GPIO and/or reset would make sense.
>>
>> However in the case of the ATH79 SoC some models have a reset line that
>> is misused to force the PHY in sleep mode. Sadly this extra reset must
>> be asserted for the PHY to work, so it wouldn't fit in such a generic
>> design.
>>
>> Still we could have such a generic driver and let the ATH79 driver
>> build on top of it. Honestly that's what I wanted to do, but getting
>> generic drivers with DT support accepted is not easy. That's why I went
>> with this driver, it is technically inferior but much easier to get
>> considered for merging.
> 
> Ok, fair enough. If we end up doing a more generic driver for this,
> we can still consider adding the compatible string there, potentially
> with some workaround for the sleep mode.

hmm, makes sense to have a generic PHY driver for PHY's which doesn't
have PHY registers to be programmed like a PHY driver which enables only
clocks, regulators, drives gpios etc.

Cheers
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web