Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1325023 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-05 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 16 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH V2 0/6] Introduce CoreSight STM support Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
[PATCH V2 5/6] coresight-stm: Bindings for System Trace Macrocell Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
[PATCH V2 4/6] Documentations: Add explanations of the case for non-configurable masters Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
[PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-05 14:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Mike Leach <Mike.Leach@arm.com> - 2016-02-05 17:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-08 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-02-05 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-08 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-02-08 18:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com> - 2016-02-08 18:50 +0100
[PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-05 14:00 +0100
[PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-05 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-05 15:40 +0100
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 0/6] Introduce CoreSight STM support |
| Message-ID | <qY0Po-7NH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patchset adds support for CoreSight STM IP block. It also makes
a little modification to the generic STM framework to cover the
CoreSight STM requirements. Full description follows the changelog.
Changes from v1:
- Added a definition of coresight_simple_func() in CS-STM driver to
avoid the kbuild test robot error for the time being. This
modification will be removed when merging the code in which the
coresight_simple_func() has been moved to the header file.
- Calculate the channel number according to the channel memory space size.
Thanks,
Chunyan
Chunyan Zhang (3):
stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface
stm class: adds a loop to extract the first valid STM device name
Documentations: Add explanations of the case for non-configurable
masters
Mathieu Poirier (2):
stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs
coresight-stm: Bindings for System Trace Macrocell
Pratik Patel (1):
coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm | 53 ++
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 28 +
Documentation/trace/coresight.txt | 37 +-
Documentation/trace/stm.txt | 6 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c | 972 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 29 +-
drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 46 +-
include/linux/coresight-stm.h | 6 +
include/linux/stm.h | 11 +
include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h | 12 +
include/uapi/linux/stm.h | 1 +
13 files changed, 1196 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm
create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/coresight-stm.h
create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 5/6] coresight-stm: Bindings for System Trace Macrocell |
| Message-ID | <qY0Po-7NH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325023 |
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
The System Trace Macrocell (STM) is an IP block falling under the
CoreSight umbrella. It's main purpose it so expose stimulus channels
to any system component for the purpose of information logging.
Bindings for this IP block adds a couple of items to the current
mandatory definition for CoreSight components.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
index 62938eb..93147c0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ its hardware characteristcs.
- "arm,coresight-etm3x", "arm,primecell";
- "arm,coresight-etm4x", "arm,primecell";
- "qcom,coresight-replicator1x", "arm,primecell";
+ - "arm,coresight-stm", "arm,primecell"; [1]
* reg: physical base address and length of the register
set(s) of the component.
@@ -36,6 +37,14 @@ its hardware characteristcs.
layout using the generic DT graph presentation found in
"bindings/graph.txt".
+* Additional required properties for System Trace Macrocells (STM):
+ * reg: along with the physical base address and length of the register
+ set as described above, another entry is required to describe the
+ mapping of the extended stimulus port area.
+
+ * reg-names: the only acceptable values are "stm-base" and
+ "stm-stimulus-base", each corresponding to the areas defined in "reg".
+
* Required properties for devices that don't show up on the AMBA bus, such as
non-configurable replicators:
@@ -202,3 +211,22 @@ Example:
};
};
};
+
+4. STM
+ stm@20100000 {
+ compatible = "arm,coresight-stm", "arm,primecell";
+ reg = <0 0x20100000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x28000000 0 0x180000>;
+ reg-names = "stm-base", "stm-stimulus-base";
+
+ clocks = <&soc_smc50mhz>;
+ clock-names = "apb_pclk";
+ port {
+ stm_out_port: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&main_funnel_in_port2>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+[1]. There is currently two version of STM: STM32 and STM500. Both
+have the same HW interface and as such don't need an explicit binding name.
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 4/6] Documentations: Add explanations of the case for non-configurable masters |
| Message-ID | <qY0Pp-7NH-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325023 |
For some STM hardware (e.g. ARM CoreSight STM), the masterID associated to a source is set at the hardware level and not user configurable. Since the masterID information isn't available to SW, introducing a new value of -1 to reflect this reality. Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> --- Documentation/trace/stm.txt | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/trace/stm.txt b/Documentation/trace/stm.txt index ea035f9..f03bc2b 100644 --- a/Documentation/trace/stm.txt +++ b/Documentation/trace/stm.txt @@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ through 127 in it. Now, any producer (trace source) identifying itself with "user" identification string will be allocated a master and channel from within these ranges. +$ cat /config/stp-policy/dummy_stm.my-policy/user/masters +-1 -1 + +Would indicate the masters for this rule are set in hardware and +not configurable in user space. + These rules can be nested, for example, one can define a rule "dummy" under "user" directory from the example above and this new rule will be used for trace sources with the id string of "user/dummy". -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qY0Po-7NH-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325023 |
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design
phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant.
This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the
core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID
management. In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1',
i.e there is only one masterID to deal with.
Also this patch depends on [1], so that the number of masterID
is '1' too.
Finally the lower and upper bound for masterIDs as presented
in ($SYSFS)/class/stm/XYZ.stm/masters and
($SYSFS)/../stp-policy/XYZ.stm.my_policy/some_device/masters
are set to '-1'. That way users can't confuse them with
architecture where masterID management is required (where any
other value would be valid).
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/22/348
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
---
drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/stm.h | 8 ++++++++
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
index 86bb4e3..cd3dc19 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
@@ -44,9 +44,15 @@ static ssize_t masters_show(struct device *dev,
char *buf)
{
struct stm_device *stm = to_stm_device(dev);
- int ret;
+ int ret, sw_start, sw_end;
+
+ sw_start = stm->data->sw_start;
+ sw_end = stm->data->sw_end;
- ret = sprintf(buf, "%u %u\n", stm->data->sw_start, stm->data->sw_end);
+ if (stm->data->mstatic)
+ sw_start = sw_end = STM_STATIC_MASTERID;
+
+ ret = sprintf(buf, "%d %d\n", sw_start, sw_end);
return ret;
}
@@ -629,7 +635,15 @@ int stm_register_device(struct device *parent, struct stm_data *stm_data,
if (!stm_data->packet || !stm_data->sw_nchannels)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * MasterIDs are statically set in HW. As such the core is
+ * using a single master for interaction with this device.
+ */
+ if (stm_data->mstatic)
+ stm_data->sw_start = stm_data->sw_end = 1;
+
nmasters = stm_data->sw_end - stm_data->sw_start;
+
stm = kzalloc(sizeof(*stm) + nmasters * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!stm)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
index 691686e..7e70ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
@@ -80,10 +80,17 @@ static ssize_t
stp_policy_node_masters_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
{
struct stp_policy_node *policy_node = to_stp_policy_node(item);
+ struct stm_device *stm = policy_node->policy->stm;
+ int first_master, last_master;
ssize_t count;
- count = sprintf(page, "%u %u\n", policy_node->first_master,
- policy_node->last_master);
+ first_master = policy_node->first_master;
+ last_master = policy_node->last_master;
+
+ if (stm && stm->data->mstatic)
+ first_master = last_master = STM_STATIC_MASTERID;
+
+ count = sprintf(page, "%d %d\n", first_master, last_master);
return count;
}
@@ -106,6 +113,13 @@ stp_policy_node_masters_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page,
if (!stm)
goto unlock;
+ /*
+ * masterIDs are statically allocated in HW, no point in trying to
+ * change their values.
+ */
+ if (stm->data->mstatic)
+ goto unlock;
+
/* must be within [sw_start..sw_end], which is an inclusive range */
if (first > INT_MAX || last > INT_MAX || first > last ||
first < stm->data->sw_start ||
@@ -325,6 +339,7 @@ stp_policies_make(struct config_group *group, const char *name)
* number of dot(s) are found in the <device_name>, the
* first matched STM device name would be extracted.
*/
+
for (p = devname; ; p++) {
p = strchr(p, '.');
if (!p) {
diff --git a/include/linux/stm.h b/include/linux/stm.h
index f351d62..c9712a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/stm.h
+++ b/include/linux/stm.h
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
/**
+ * The masterIDs are statically set in hardware and can't be queried
+ */
+#define STM_STATIC_MASTERID -1
+
+/**
* enum stp_packet_type - STP packets that an STM driver sends
*/
enum stp_packet_type {
@@ -46,6 +51,8 @@ struct stm_device;
* struct stm_data - STM device description and callbacks
* @name: device name
* @stm: internal structure, only used by stm class code
+ * @mstatic: true if masterIDs are assigned in HW. If so @sw_start
+ * and @sw_end are set to '1' by the core.
* @sw_start: first STP master available to software
* @sw_end: last STP master available to software
* @sw_nchannels: number of STP channels per master
@@ -71,6 +78,7 @@ struct stm_device;
struct stm_data {
const char *name;
struct stm_device *stm;
+ bool mstatic;
unsigned int sw_start;
unsigned int sw_end;
unsigned int sw_nchannels;
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 14:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qYO9s-lP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325029 |
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: > From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > > Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design > phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant. > > This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the > core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID > management. So why do we need this patch? If your STM only has master 42 allocated for software sources, simply set sw_start = 42, sw_end = 42 and you're good to go, software will have exactly one channel to choose from. See also the comment from <linux/stm.h>: * @sw_start: first STP master available to software * @sw_end: last STP master available to software particularly the "available to software" part. Any other kinds of masters the STM class code doesn't care about (yet). > In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1', > i.e there is only one masterID to deal with. This is also a completely arbitrary and unnecessary requirement. Again, you can set both to 42 and it will still work. > Also this patch depends on [1], so that the number of masterID > is '1' too. > > Finally the lower and upper bound for masterIDs as presented > in ($SYSFS)/class/stm/XYZ.stm/masters and > ($SYSFS)/../stp-policy/XYZ.stm.my_policy/some_device/masters > are set to '-1'. That way users can't confuse them with > architecture where masterID management is required (where any > other value would be valid). Why is this a good idea? Having the actual master there will allow software to know what it is and also tell the decoding side what it is (assuming you have more than one source in the STP stream, it might not be easy to figure out, unless you know it in advance). I don't see how one master statically assigned to software sources is different from two masters or 32 masters. And I don't see any benefit of hiding the master id from userspace. Am I missing something? Regards, -- Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Leach <Mike.Leach@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 17:40 +0100 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qYRAm-2Gm-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327636 |
Hi, I think a quick clarification of the ARM hardware STM architecture may be of value here. The ARM hardware STM, when implemented as recommend in a hardware design, the master IDs are not under driver control, but have a hardwire association with source devices in the system. The master IDs are hardwired to individual cores and core security states, and there could be other IDs associated with hardware trace sources requiring output via the hardware STM. (an example of this is the ARM Juno development board). Therefore in multi-core systems many masters may be associated with a single software STM stream. A user-space application running on Core 1, may have a master ID of 0x11 in the STPv2 trace stream, but if this application is context switched and later continues running on Core 2, then master ID could change to 0x21. Masters identify a hardware source in this scheme, the precise values used will be implementation dependent. So the number of masters "available to the software" depends on your interpretation of the phrase. If you mean "master IDs on which software trace will appear" then that will be many - it depends on which core is running the application. However as described above, this is not predictable by any decoder, and the master set used may not be contiguous. If you mean "master IDs selectable/allocated by the driver" then that will be 0 - the driver has no control, and possibly no knowledge of which master is associated with the current execution context. (this is of course system dependent - it may well be possible to have some configuration database associating cores with hardware IDs, but this will be implementation and board support dependant). Therefore, there is a requirement to tell both the user-space STM client and decoder that not only is master ID management not needed - it is in fact not possible and the key to identify the software source for a given STM packet is the channel alone. In addition we have a nominal single Master ID "available to the software", to satisfy the requirements of the generic ST module API. So on Juno for example, while we do have 128 masters, each with 65536 channels, the master allocation is not visible to system software - each core sees a single master with 65536 channels. Therefore differentiation between software sources in the STM trace is by channel number allocations only. Best Regards Mike. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Leach +44 (0)1254 893911 (Direct) Principal Engineer +44 (0)1254 893900 (Main) Arm Blackburn Design Centre +44 (0)1254 893901 (Fax) Belthorn House Walker Rd mailto:mike.leach@arm.com Guide Blackburn BB1 2QE ---------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Shishkin [mailto:alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com] > Sent: 05 February 2016 12:52 > To: Chunyan Zhang; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org > Cc: robh@kernel.org; broonie@kernel.org; pratikp@codeaurora.org; > nicolas.guion@st.com; corbet@lwn.net; Mark Rutland; Mike Leach; > tor@ti.com; Al Grant; zhang.lyra@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-api@vger.kernel.org; linux- > doc@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned > masterIDs > > Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: > > > From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > > > > Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design > > phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant. > > > > This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the > > core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID > > management. > > So why do we need this patch? If your STM only has master 42 allocated > for software sources, simply set sw_start = 42, sw_end = 42 and you're > good to go, software will have exactly one channel to choose from. See > also the comment from <linux/stm.h>: > > * @sw_start: first STP master available to software > * @sw_end: last STP master available to software > > particularly the "available to software" part. Any other kinds of > masters the STM class code doesn't care about (yet). > > > In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1', > > i.e there is only one masterID to deal with. > > This is also a completely arbitrary and unnecessary requirement. Again, > you can set both to 42 and it will still work. > > > Also this patch depends on [1], so that the number of masterID > > is '1' too. > > > > Finally the lower and upper bound for masterIDs as presented > > in ($SYSFS)/class/stm/XYZ.stm/masters and > > ($SYSFS)/../stp-policy/XYZ.stm.my_policy/some_device/masters > > are set to '-1'. That way users can't confuse them with > > architecture where masterID management is required (where any > > other value would be valid). > > Why is this a good idea? Having the actual master there will allow > software to know what it is and also tell the decoding side what it is > (assuming you have more than one source in the STP stream, it might not > be easy to figure out, unless you know it in advance). > > I don't see how one master statically assigned to software sources is > different from two masters or 32 masters. And I don't see any benefit of > hiding the master id from userspace. Am I missing something? > > Regards, > -- > Alex IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qZRHX-44z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327914 |
Mike Leach <Mike.Leach@arm.com> writes: > Hi, > > I think a quick clarification of the ARM hardware STM architecture may be of value here. > > The ARM hardware STM, when implemented as recommend in a hardware design, the master IDs are not under driver control, but have a hardwire association with source devices in the system. The master IDs are hardwired to individual cores and core security states, and there could be other IDs associated with hardware trace sources requiring output via the hardware STM. (an example of this is the ARM Juno development board). > > Therefore in multi-core systems many masters may be associated with a single software STM stream. A user-space application running on Core 1, may have a master ID of 0x11 in the STPv2 trace stream, but if this application is context switched and later continues running on Core 2, then master ID could change to 0x21. Masters identify a hardware source in this scheme, the precise values used will be implementation dependent. > > So the number of masters "available to the software" depends on your interpretation of the phrase. > If you mean "master IDs on which software trace will appear" then that will be many - it depends on which core is running the application. However as described above, this is not predictable by any decoder, and the master set used may not be contiguous. > If you mean "master IDs selectable/allocated by the driver" then that will be 0 - the driver has no control, and possibly no knowledge of which master is associated with the current execution context. (this is of course system dependent - it may well be possible to have some configuration database associating cores with hardware IDs, but this will be implementation and board support dependant). > > Therefore, there is a requirement to tell both the user-space STM client and decoder that not only is master ID management not needed - it is in fact not possible and the key to identify the software source for a given STM packet is the channel alone. In addition we have a nominal single Master ID "available to the software", to satisfy the requirements of the generic ST module API. > > So on Juno for example, while we do have 128 masters, each with 65536 channels, the master allocation is not visible to system software - each core sees a single master with 65536 channels. Therefore differentiation between software sources in the STM trace is by channel number allocations only. Ok, thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. I was confused by the "static" bit in the patch description. It looks like something along the lines of this patch might indeed be in order. Regards, -- Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 19:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qYSZu-3G7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327636 |
On 5 February 2016 at 05:52, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: > >> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> >> >> Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design >> phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant. >> >> This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the >> core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID >> management. > > So why do we need this patch? If your STM only has master 42 allocated > for software sources, simply set sw_start = 42, sw_end = 42 and you're > good to go, software will have exactly one channel to choose from. See > also the comment from <linux/stm.h>: On ARM each source, i.e entity capable of accessing STM channels, has a different master ID set in HW. We can't assume the IDs are contiguous and from a SW point of view there is no way to probe the values. > > * @sw_start: first STP master available to software > * @sw_end: last STP master available to software > > particularly the "available to software" part. Any other kinds of > masters the STM class code doesn't care about (yet). > >> In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1', >> i.e there is only one masterID to deal with. > > This is also a completely arbitrary and unnecessary requirement. Again, > you can set both to 42 and it will still work. True - any value will do. The important thing to remember is that on ARM, there is only one masterID channel (from an STM core point of view). But we could also proceed differently, see below for more details. > >> Also this patch depends on [1], so that the number of masterID >> is '1' too. >> >> Finally the lower and upper bound for masterIDs as presented >> in ($SYSFS)/class/stm/XYZ.stm/masters and >> ($SYSFS)/../stp-policy/XYZ.stm.my_policy/some_device/masters >> are set to '-1'. That way users can't confuse them with >> architecture where masterID management is required (where any >> other value would be valid). > > Why is this a good idea? Having the actual master there will allow > software to know what it is and also tell the decoding side what it is > (assuming you have more than one source in the STP stream, it might not > be easy to figure out, unless you know it in advance). In the ARM world masterIDs are irrelevant so why bother with them? Writing a '-1' simply highlight this reality. Another way of approaching the problem would be to change sw_start/end to a bitfield that represent the valid masterIDs but in my opinion, it is a lot of code churn for information that isn't used outside of the decoder. Thanks, Mathieu > > I don't see how one master statically assigned to software sources is > different from two masters or 32 masters. And I don't see any benefit of > hiding the master id from userspace. Am I missing something? > > Regards, > -- > Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 14:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qZU38-5Ph-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327979 |
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> writes: > On 5 February 2016 at 05:52, Alexander Shishkin > <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: >> >>> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> >>> >>> Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design >>> phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant. >>> >>> This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the >>> core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID >>> management. >> >> So why do we need this patch? If your STM only has master 42 allocated >> for software sources, simply set sw_start = 42, sw_end = 42 and you're >> good to go, software will have exactly one channel to choose from. See >> also the comment from <linux/stm.h>: > > On ARM each source, i.e entity capable of accessing STM channels, has > a different master ID set in HW. We can't assume the IDs are > contiguous and from a SW point of view there is no way to probe the > values. Ok, it's the 'static' word that got me confused. From Mike's explanation it seems to me that it's the antithesis of static; the master ID assignment is so dynamic that it's not controllable by the software and may or may not reflect core id, power state, phase of the moon, etc. >>> In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1', >>> i.e there is only one masterID to deal with. >> >> This is also a completely arbitrary and unnecessary requirement. Again, >> you can set both to 42 and it will still work. > > True - any value will do. The important thing to remember is that on > ARM, there is only one masterID channel (from an STM core point of > view). But we could also proceed differently, see below for more > details. Well, we have the masters attribute with two numbers in it that define the range of master IDs that the software can choose from. More specifically to this situation: * the number of channel ID spaces available to the SW is $end - $start + 1, that is, in your case, just 1; * the number of master IDs for the SW to choose from is $end - $start; * if $end==$start, their actual numeric value doesn't really matter, either for the policy definition or for the actual writers. This $end==$start situation itself may be ambiguous and can be interpreted either as having just one *static* master ID fixed for all SW writers (what I assumed from your commit message) or as having a floating master ID, which changes of its own accord and is not controllable by software. These two situations are really the same thing from the perspective of the system under tracing. Also, both of these situations should already work if the driver sets both sw_start and sw_end to the same value. Regards, -- Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qZXu3-8en-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1329030 |
On 8 February 2016 at 06:26, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 5 February 2016 at 05:52, Alexander Shishkin >> <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: >>> >>>> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> >>>> >>>> Some architecture like ARM assign masterIDs statically at the HW design >>>> phase, making masterID manipulation in the generic STM core irrelevant. >>>> >>>> This patch adds a new 'mstatic' flag to struct stm_data that tells the >>>> core that this specific STM device doesn't need explicit masterID >>>> management. >>> >>> So why do we need this patch? If your STM only has master 42 allocated >>> for software sources, simply set sw_start = 42, sw_end = 42 and you're >>> good to go, software will have exactly one channel to choose from. See >>> also the comment from <linux/stm.h>: >> >> On ARM each source, i.e entity capable of accessing STM channels, has >> a different master ID set in HW. We can't assume the IDs are >> contiguous and from a SW point of view there is no way to probe the >> values. > > Ok, it's the 'static' word that got me confused. From Mike's explanation > it seems to me that it's the antithesis of static; the master ID > assignment is so dynamic that it's not controllable by the software and > may or may not reflect core id, power state, phase of the moon, etc. Mike did write "master IDs are hardwired to individual cores and core security states", which make assignment for one platform very static. On the flip side those will change from one system to another. > >>>> In the core sw_start/end of masterID are set to '1', >>>> i.e there is only one masterID to deal with. >>> >>> This is also a completely arbitrary and unnecessary requirement. Again, >>> you can set both to 42 and it will still work. >> >> True - any value will do. The important thing to remember is that on >> ARM, there is only one masterID channel (from an STM core point of >> view). But we could also proceed differently, see below for more >> details. > > Well, we have the masters attribute with two numbers in it that define > the range of master IDs that the software can choose from. More > specifically to this situation: > > * the number of channel ID spaces available to the SW is > $end - $start + 1, that is, in your case, just 1; > * the number of master IDs for the SW to choose from is $end - $start; > * if $end==$start, their actual numeric value doesn't really matter, > either for the policy definition or for the actual writers. > > This $end==$start situation itself may be ambiguous and can be > interpreted either as having just one *static* master ID fixed for all > SW writers (what I assumed from your commit message) or as having a > floating master ID, which changes of its own accord and is not > controllable by software. Some clarification here. On ARM from a SW point of view $end == $start and that doesn't change (with regards to masterIDs) . The ambiguity comes from the fact that on other platforms where masterID configuration does change and is important, the condition $end == $start could also be valid. From configFS, how do we tell users when masterIDs are set in HW? That's what I wanted to highlight with the '-1'. Regardless of the solution we choose I think it is important that we inform, at the very least, users when masterIDs don't matter. We could also leave thing as is, kill this patch and document things thoroughly. With the former things are obvious. > > These two situations are really the same thing from the perspective of > the system under tracing. Also, both of these situations should already > work if the driver sets both sw_start and sw_end to the same > value. > > Regards, > -- > Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:50 +0100 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH V2 3/6] stm class: provision for statically assigned masterIDs |
| Message-ID | <qZY6K-8uH-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1329348 |
> Mike did write "master IDs are hardwired to individual cores and core security > states", which make assignment for one platform very static. > On the flip side those will change from one system to another. It depends on your perspective. From the perspective of a userspace process not pinned to a core, the master id will appear to vary dynamically and unpredictably as the thread migrates from one core to another. (That's actually useful if the decoder wants to know where the thread is running at any given point, as it can find that out for free, without the need to track migration events.) On the other hand if you are pinned (e.g. you're the kernel on a particular core, or you're a per-core worker thread in some thread pooling system) then you have a fixed master id, and then you can have one instance per core all using the same range of channel numbers, with the master id indicating the core - this saves on channel space compared to having to give each core its own range of channel space. Al IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface |
| Message-ID | <qY0Pp-7NH-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325023 |
There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet.
Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current
status of that option by means of get_options interface. This
interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver.
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
---
drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/stm.h | 3 +++
include/uapi/linux/stm.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
index b6445d9..86bb4e3 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
@@ -571,6 +571,17 @@ stm_char_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
options);
break;
+
+ case STP_GET_OPTIONS:
+ if (stm_data->get_options)
+ err = stm_data->get_options(stm_data,
+ stmf->output.master,
+ stmf->output.channel,
+ stmf->output.nr_chans,
+ &options);
+
+ return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &options, sizeof(u64));
+
default:
break;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/stm.h b/include/linux/stm.h
index 9d0083d..f351d62 100644
--- a/include/linux/stm.h
+++ b/include/linux/stm.h
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ struct stm_data {
long (*set_options)(struct stm_data *, unsigned int,
unsigned int, unsigned int,
unsigned long);
+ long (*get_options)(struct stm_data *, unsigned int,
+ unsigned int, unsigned int,
+ u64 *);
};
int stm_register_device(struct device *parent, struct stm_data *stm_data,
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stm.h b/include/uapi/linux/stm.h
index 626a8d3..0dab16e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/stm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/stm.h
@@ -46,5 +46,6 @@ struct stp_policy_id {
#define STP_POLICY_ID_SET _IOWR('%', 0, struct stp_policy_id)
#define STP_POLICY_ID_GET _IOR('%', 1, struct stp_policy_id)
#define STP_SET_OPTIONS _IOW('%', 2, __u64)
+#define STP_GET_OPTIONS _IOR('%', 3, __u64)
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_STM_H */
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 14:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface |
| Message-ID | <qYO9s-lP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325031 |
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes: > There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. > Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current > status of that option by means of get_options interface. This > interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver. > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ > include/linux/stm.h | 3 +++ > include/uapi/linux/stm.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c > index b6445d9..86bb4e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c > @@ -571,6 +571,17 @@ stm_char_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > options); > > break; > + > + case STP_GET_OPTIONS: > + if (stm_data->get_options) > + err = stm_data->get_options(stm_data, > + stmf->output.master, > + stmf->output.channel, > + stmf->output.nr_chans, > + &options); > + > + return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &options, sizeof(u64)); The return value of copy_to_user() is not what you assume it is. Regards, -- Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component |
| Message-ID | <qY0Pp-7NH-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325023 |
From: Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>
This driver adds support for the STM CoreSight IP block, allowing any
system compoment (HW or SW) to log and aggregate messages via a
single entity.
The CoreSight STM exposes an application defined number of channels
called stimulus port. Configuration is done using entries in sysfs
and channels made available to userspace via configfs.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
---
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm | 53 ++
Documentation/trace/coresight.txt | 37 +-
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c | 972 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/coresight-stm.h | 6 +
include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h | 12 +
7 files changed, 1090 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm
create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/coresight-stm.h
create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a1d7022
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/enable_source
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Enable/disable tracing on this specific trace macrocell.
+ Enabling the trace macrocell implies it has been configured
+ properly and a sink has been identidifed for it. The path
+ of coresight components linking the source to the sink is
+ configured and managed automatically by the coresight framework.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/hwevent_enable
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Provides access to the HW event enable register, used in
+ conjunction with HW event bank select register.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/hwevent_select
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Gives access to the HW event block select register
+ (STMHEBSR) in order to configure up to 256 channels. Used in
+ conjunction with "hwevent_enable" register as described above.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/port_enable
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Provides access to the stimlus port enable register
+ (STMSPER). Used in conjunction with "port_select" described
+ below.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/port_select
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Used to determine which bank of stimulus port bit in
+ register STMSPER (see above) apply to.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/status
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (R) List various control and status registers. The specific
+ layout and content is driver specific.
+
+What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<memory_map>.stm/traceid
+Date: February 2016
+KernelVersion: 4.5
+Contact: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+Description: (RW) Holds the trace ID that will appear in the trace stream
+ coming from this trace entity.
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/coresight.txt b/Documentation/trace/coresight.txt
index 0a5c329..a33c88c 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/trace/coresight.txt
@@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ expected to be accessed and controlled using those entries.
Last but not least, "struct module *owner" is expected to be set to reflect
the information carried in "THIS_MODULE".
-How to use
-----------
+How to use the tracer modules
+-----------------------------
Before trace collection can start, a coresight sink needs to be identify.
There is no limit on the amount of sinks (nor sources) that can be enabled at
@@ -297,3 +297,36 @@ Info Tracing enabled
Instruction 13570831 0x8026B584 E28DD00C false ADD sp,sp,#0xc
Instruction 0 0x8026B588 E8BD8000 true LDM sp!,{pc}
Timestamp Timestamp: 17107041535
+
+How to use the STM module
+-------------------------
+
+Using the System Trace Macrocell module is the same as the tracers - the only
+difference is that clients are driving the trace capture rather
+than the program flow through the code.
+
+As with any other CoreSight component, specifics about the STM tracer can be
+found in sysfs with more information on each entry being found in [1]:
+
+root@genericarmv8:~# ls /sys/bus/coresight/devices/20100000.stm
+enable_source hwevent_select port_enable subsystem uevent
+hwevent_enable mgmt port_select traceid
+root@genericarmv8:~#
+
+Like any other source a sink needs to be identified and the STM enabled before
+being used:
+
+root@genericarmv8:~# echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/20010000.etf/enable_sink
+root@genericarmv8:~# echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/20100000.stm/enable_source
+
+From there user space applications can request and use channels using the devfs
+interface provided for that purpose by the generic STM API:
+
+root@genericarmv8:~# ls -l /dev/20100000.stm
+crw------- 1 root root 10, 61 Jan 3 18:11 /dev/20100000.stm
+root@genericarmv8:~#
+
+Details on how to use the generic STM API can be found here [2].
+
+[1]. Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-stm
+[2]. Documentation/trace/stm.txt
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
index c85935f..f4a8bfa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
@@ -77,4 +77,15 @@ config CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR
programmable ATB replicator sends the ATB trace stream from the
ETB/ETF to the TPIUi and ETR.
+config CORESIGHT_STM
+ bool "CoreSight System Trace Macrocell driver"
+ depends on (ARM && !(CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T)) || ARM64
+ select CORESIGHT_LINKS_AND_SINKS
+ select STM
+ help
+ This driver provides support for hardware assisted software
+ instrumentation based tracing. This is primarily used for
+ logging useful software events or data coming from various entities
+ in the system, possibly running different OSs
+
endif
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
index 99f8e5f..1f6eaec 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_LINKS_AND_SINKS) += coresight-funnel.o \
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM3X) += coresight-etm3x.o coresight-etm-cp14.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X) += coresight-etm4x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR) += coresight-replicator-qcom.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_STM) += coresight-stm.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c84f57a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,972 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2015-2016, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
+ * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * Initial implementation by Pratik Patel
+ * (C) 2014-2015 Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>
+ *
+ * Serious refactoring, code cleanup and upgrading to the Coresight upstream
+ * framework by Mathieu Poirier
+ * (C) 2015-2016 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+ *
+ * Guaranteed timing and support for various packet type coming from the
+ * generic STM API by Chunyan Zhang
+ * (C) 2015-2016 Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
+ */
+#include <linux/amba/bus.h>
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/coresight.h>
+#include <linux/coresight-stm.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/stm.h>
+
+#include "coresight-priv.h"
+
+#define STMDMASTARTR 0xc04
+#define STMDMASTOPR 0xc08
+#define STMDMASTATR 0xc0c
+#define STMDMACTLR 0xc10
+#define STMDMAIDR 0xcfc
+#define STMHEER 0xd00
+#define STMHETER 0xd20
+#define STMHEBSR 0xd60
+#define STMHEMCR 0xd64
+#define STMHEMASTR 0xdf4
+#define STMHEFEAT1R 0xdf8
+#define STMHEIDR 0xdfc
+#define STMSPER 0xe00
+#define STMSPTER 0xe20
+#define STMPRIVMASKR 0xe40
+#define STMSPSCR 0xe60
+#define STMSPMSCR 0xe64
+#define STMSPOVERRIDER 0xe68
+#define STMSPMOVERRIDER 0xe6c
+#define STMSPTRIGCSR 0xe70
+#define STMTCSR 0xe80
+#define STMTSSTIMR 0xe84
+#define STMTSFREQR 0xe8c
+#define STMSYNCR 0xe90
+#define STMAUXCR 0xe94
+#define STMSPFEAT1R 0xea0
+#define STMSPFEAT2R 0xea4
+#define STMSPFEAT3R 0xea8
+#define STMITTRIGGER 0xee8
+#define STMITATBDATA0 0xeec
+#define STMITATBCTR2 0xef0
+#define STMITATBID 0xef4
+#define STMITATBCTR0 0xef8
+
+#define STM_32_CHANNEL 32
+#define BYTES_PER_CHANNEL 256
+#define STM_TRACE_BUF_SIZE 4096
+#define STM_SW_MASTER_END 127
+
+/* Register bit definition */
+#define STMTCSR_BUSY_BIT 23
+/* Reserve the first 10 channels for kernel usage */
+#define STM_CHANNEL_OFFSET 0
+
+enum stm_pkt_type {
+ STM_PKT_TYPE_DATA = 0x98,
+ STM_PKT_TYPE_FLAG = 0xE8,
+ STM_PKT_TYPE_TRIG = 0xF8,
+};
+
+#define stm_channel_addr(drvdata, ch) (drvdata->chs.base + \
+ (ch * BYTES_PER_CHANNEL))
+#define stm_channel_off(type, opts) (type & ~opts)
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
+static inline void __raw_writeq(u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ asm volatile("strd %1, %0"
+ : "+Qo" (*(volatile u64 __force *)addr)
+ : "r" (val));
+}
+#undef writeq_relaxed
+#define writeq_relaxed(v, c) __raw_writeq((__force u64) cpu_to_le64(v), c)
+#endif
+
+static int boot_nr_channel;
+
+module_param_named(
+ boot_nr_channel, boot_nr_channel, int, S_IRUGO
+);
+
+/**
+ * struct channel_space - central management entity for extended ports
+ * @base: memory mapped base address where channels start.
+ * @guaraneed: is the channel delivery guaranteed.
+ */
+struct channel_space {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ unsigned long *guaranteed;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stm_drvdata - specifics associated to an STM component
+ * @base: memory mapped base address for this component.
+ * @dev: the device entity associated to this component.
+ * @atclk: optional clock for the core parts of the STM.
+ * @csdev: component vitals needed by the framework.
+ * @spinlock: only one at a time pls.
+ * @chs: the channels accociated to this STM.
+ * @stm: structure associated to the generic STM interface.
+ * @enable: this STM is being used.
+ * @traceid: value of the current ID for this component.
+ * @write_64bit: whether this STM supports 64 bit access.
+ * @stmsper: settings for register STMSPER.
+ * @stmspscr: settings for register STMSPSCR.
+ * @numsp: the total number of stimulus port support by this STM.
+ * @stmheer: settings for register STMHEER.
+ * @stmheter: settings for register STMHETER.
+ * @stmhebsr: settings for register STMHEBSR.
+ */
+struct stm_drvdata {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct clk *atclk;
+ struct coresight_device *csdev;
+ spinlock_t spinlock;
+ struct channel_space chs;
+ struct stm_data stm;
+ bool enable;
+ u8 traceid;
+ u32 write_64bit;
+ u32 stmsper;
+ u32 stmspscr;
+ u32 numsp;
+ u32 stmheer;
+ u32 stmheter;
+ u32 stmhebsr;
+};
+
+static void stm_hwevent_enable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmhebsr, drvdata->base + STMHEBSR);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmheter, drvdata->base + STMHETER);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmheer, drvdata->base + STMHEER);
+ writel_relaxed(0x01 | /* Enable HW event tracing */
+ 0x04, /* Error detection on event tracing */
+ drvdata->base + STMHEMCR);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static void stm_port_enable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+ /* ATB trigger enable on direct writes to TRIG locations */
+ writel_relaxed(0x10,
+ drvdata->base + STMSPTRIGCSR);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmspscr, drvdata->base + STMSPSCR);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmsper, drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static void stm_enable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ if (drvdata->stmheer)
+ stm_hwevent_enable_hw(drvdata);
+
+ stm_port_enable_hw(drvdata);
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ /* 4096 byte between synchronisation packets */
+ writel_relaxed(0xFFF, drvdata->base + STMSYNCR);
+ writel_relaxed((drvdata->traceid << 16 | /* trace id */
+ 0x02 | /* timestamp enable */
+ 0x01), /* global STM enable */
+ drvdata->base + STMTCSR);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static int stm_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
+
+ pm_runtime_get_sync(drvdata->dev);
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ stm_enable_hw(drvdata);
+ drvdata->enable = true;
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ dev_info(drvdata->dev, "STM tracing enabled\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void stm_hwevent_disable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMHEMCR);
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMHEER);
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMHETER);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static void stm_port_disable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMSPTRIGCSR);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static void stm_disable_hw(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + STMTCSR);
+ val &= ~0x1; /* clear global STM enable [0] */
+ writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + STMTCSR);
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ stm_port_disable_hw(drvdata);
+ if (drvdata->stmheer)
+ stm_hwevent_disable_hw(drvdata);
+}
+
+static void stm_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ stm_disable_hw(drvdata);
+ drvdata->enable = false;
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ /* Wait until the engine has completely stopped */
+ coresight_timeout(drvdata, STMTCSR, STMTCSR_BUSY_BIT, 0);
+
+ pm_runtime_put(drvdata->dev);
+
+ dev_info(drvdata->dev, "STM tracing disabled\n");
+}
+
+static int stm_trace_id(struct coresight_device *csdev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
+
+ return drvdata->traceid;
+}
+
+static const struct coresight_ops_source stm_source_ops = {
+ .trace_id = stm_trace_id,
+ .enable = stm_enable,
+ .disable = stm_disable,
+};
+
+static const struct coresight_ops stm_cs_ops = {
+ .source_ops = &stm_source_ops,
+};
+
+static int stm_send_64bit(void *addr, const void *data, u32 size)
+{
+ u64 prepad = 0;
+ u64 postpad = 0;
+ char *pad;
+ u8 off, endoff;
+ u32 len = size;
+
+ off = (unsigned long)data & 0x7;
+
+ if (off) {
+ endoff = 8 - off;
+ pad = (char *)&prepad;
+ pad += off;
+
+ while (endoff && size) {
+ *pad++ = *(char *)data++;
+ endoff--;
+ size--;
+ }
+ writeq_relaxed(prepad, addr);
+ }
+
+ /* now we are 64bit aligned */
+ while (size >= 8) {
+ writeq_relaxed(*(u64 *)data, addr);
+ data += 8;
+ size -= 8;
+ }
+
+ endoff = 0;
+
+ if (size) {
+ endoff = 8 - (u8)size;
+ pad = (char *)&postpad;
+
+ while (size) {
+ *pad++ = *(char *)data++;
+ size--;
+ }
+ writeq_relaxed(postpad, addr);
+ }
+
+ return len + off + endoff;
+}
+
+static int stm_send(void *addr, const void *data, u32 size)
+{
+ u32 len = size;
+
+ if (((unsigned long)data & 0x1) && (size >= 1)) {
+ writeb_relaxed(*(u8 *)data, addr);
+ data++;
+ size--;
+ }
+ if (((unsigned long)data & 0x2) && (size >= 2)) {
+ writew_relaxed(*(u16 *)data, addr);
+ data += 2;
+ size -= 2;
+ }
+
+ /* now we are 32bit aligned */
+ while (size >= 4) {
+ writel_relaxed(*(u32 *)data, addr);
+ data += 4;
+ size -= 4;
+ }
+
+ if (size >= 2) {
+ writew_relaxed(*(u16 *)data, addr);
+ data += 2;
+ size -= 2;
+ }
+ if (size >= 1) {
+ writeb_relaxed(*(u8 *)data, addr);
+ data++;
+ size--;
+ }
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+static int stm_generic_link(struct stm_data *stm_data,
+ unsigned int master, unsigned int channel)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(stm_data,
+ struct stm_drvdata, stm);
+ if (!drvdata || !drvdata->csdev)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return coresight_enable(drvdata->csdev);
+}
+
+static void stm_generic_unlink(struct stm_data *stm_data,
+ unsigned int master, unsigned int channel)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(stm_data,
+ struct stm_drvdata, stm);
+ if (!drvdata || !drvdata->csdev)
+ return;
+
+ stm_disable(drvdata->csdev);
+}
+
+static long stm_generic_set_options(struct stm_data *stm_data,
+ unsigned int master,
+ unsigned int channel,
+ unsigned int nr_chans,
+ unsigned long options)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(stm_data,
+ struct stm_drvdata, stm);
+ if (!(drvdata && drvdata->enable))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (channel >= drvdata->numsp)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch (options) {
+ case STM_OPTION_GUARANTEED:
+ set_bit(channel, drvdata->chs.guaranteed);
+ break;
+
+ case STM_OPTION_INVARIANT:
+ clear_bit(channel, drvdata->chs.guaranteed);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static long stm_generic_get_options(struct stm_data *stm_data,
+ unsigned int master,
+ unsigned int channel,
+ unsigned int nr_chans,
+ u64 *options)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(stm_data,
+ struct stm_drvdata, stm);
+ if (!(drvdata && drvdata->enable))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (channel >= drvdata->numsp)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch (*options) {
+ case STM_OPTION_GUARANTEED:
+ *options = test_bit(channel, drvdata->chs.guaranteed);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t stm_generic_packet(struct stm_data *stm_data,
+ unsigned int master,
+ unsigned int channel,
+ unsigned int packet,
+ unsigned int flags,
+ unsigned int size,
+ const unsigned char *payload)
+{
+ unsigned int len = size;
+ unsigned long ch_addr;
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(stm_data,
+ struct stm_drvdata, stm);
+ if (!(drvdata && drvdata->enable))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (channel >= drvdata->numsp)
+ return 0;
+
+ ch_addr = (unsigned long)stm_channel_addr(drvdata, channel);
+
+ flags = (flags == STP_PACKET_TIMESTAMPED) ? STM_FLAG_TIMESTAMPED : 0;
+ flags |= test_bit(channel, drvdata->chs.guaranteed) ?
+ STM_FLAG_GUARANTEED : 0;
+
+ switch (packet) {
+ case STP_PACKET_FLAG:
+ ch_addr |= stm_channel_off(STM_PKT_TYPE_FLAG, flags);
+
+ /* the generic STM API set a size of zero on flag packets. */
+ len = 1;
+ break;
+
+ case STP_PACKET_DATA:
+ ch_addr |= stm_channel_off(STM_PKT_TYPE_DATA, flags);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (drvdata->write_64bit)
+ return stm_send_64bit((void *)ch_addr, payload, len);
+
+ return stm_send((void *)ch_addr, payload, len);
+}
+
+static ssize_t hwevent_enable_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val = drvdata->stmheer;
+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%#lx\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t hwevent_enable_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ drvdata->stmheer = val;
+ /* HW event enable and trigger go hand in hand */
+ drvdata->stmheter = val;
+
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(hwevent_enable);
+
+static ssize_t hwevent_select_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val = drvdata->stmhebsr;
+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%#lx\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t hwevent_select_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ drvdata->stmhebsr = val;
+
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(hwevent_select);
+
+static ssize_t port_select_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if (!drvdata->enable) {
+ val = drvdata->stmspscr;
+ } else {
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + STMSPSCR);
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ }
+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%#lx\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t port_select_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val, stmsper;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ drvdata->stmspscr = val;
+
+ if (drvdata->enable) {
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+ /* Process as per ARM's TRM recommendation */
+ stmsper = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmspscr, drvdata->base + STMSPSCR);
+ writel_relaxed(stmsper, drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(port_select);
+
+static ssize_t port_enable_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if (!drvdata->enable) {
+ val = drvdata->stmsper;
+ } else {
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ }
+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%#lx\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t port_enable_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ drvdata->stmsper = val;
+
+ if (drvdata->enable) {
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+ writel_relaxed(drvdata->stmsper, drvdata->base + STMSPER);
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(port_enable);
+
+static ssize_t traceid_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ unsigned long val;
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ val = drvdata->traceid;
+ return sprintf(buf, "%#lx\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t traceid_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned long val;
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* traceid field is 7bit wide on STM32 */
+ drvdata->traceid = val & 0x7f;
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(traceid);
+
+#define coresight_simple_func(type, name, offset) \
+static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *_dev, \
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
+{ \
+ type *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(_dev->parent); \
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%08x\n", \
+ readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + offset)); \
+} \
+DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name)
+
+#define coresight_stm_simple_func(name, offset) \
+ coresight_simple_func(struct stm_drvdata, name, offset)
+
+coresight_stm_simple_func(tcsr, STMTCSR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(tsfreqr, STMTSFREQR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(syncr, STMSYNCR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(sper, STMSPER);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spter, STMSPTER);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(privmaskr, STMPRIVMASKR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spscr, STMSPSCR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spmscr, STMSPMSCR);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spfeat1r, STMSPFEAT1R);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spfeat2r, STMSPFEAT2R);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(spfeat3r, STMSPFEAT3R);
+coresight_stm_simple_func(devid, CORESIGHT_DEVID);
+
+static struct attribute *coresight_stm_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_hwevent_enable.attr,
+ &dev_attr_hwevent_select.attr,
+ &dev_attr_port_enable.attr,
+ &dev_attr_port_select.attr,
+ &dev_attr_traceid.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute *coresight_stm_mgmt_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_tcsr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_tsfreqr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_syncr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_sper.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spter.attr,
+ &dev_attr_privmaskr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spscr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spmscr.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spfeat1r.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spfeat2r.attr,
+ &dev_attr_spfeat3r.attr,
+ &dev_attr_devid.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group coresight_stm_group = {
+ .attrs = coresight_stm_attrs,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group coresight_stm_mgmt_group = {
+ .attrs = coresight_stm_mgmt_attrs,
+ .name = "mgmt",
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *coresight_stm_groups[] = {
+ &coresight_stm_group,
+ &coresight_stm_mgmt_group,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static int stm_get_resource_byname(struct device_node *np,
+ char *ch_base, struct resource *res)
+{
+ const char *name = NULL;
+ int index = 0, found = 0;
+
+ while (!of_property_read_string_index(np, "reg-names", index, &name)) {
+ if (strcmp(ch_base, name)) {
+ index++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* We have a match and @index is where it's at */
+ found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (!found)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return of_address_to_resource(np, index, res);
+}
+
+static u32 stm_fundamental_data_size(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ u32 stmspfeat2r;
+
+ stmspfeat2r = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + STMSPFEAT2R);
+ return BMVAL(stmspfeat2r, 12, 15);
+}
+
+static u32 stm_num_stimulus_port(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ u32 numsp;
+
+ numsp = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + CORESIGHT_DEVID);
+ /*
+ * NUMPS in STMDEVID is 17 bit long and if equal to 0x0,
+ * 32 stimulus ports are supported.
+ */
+ numsp &= 0x1ffff;
+ if (!numsp)
+ numsp = STM_32_CHANNEL;
+ return numsp;
+}
+
+static void stm_init_default_data(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ /* Don't use port selection */
+ drvdata->stmspscr = 0x0;
+ /*
+ * Enable all channel regardless of their number. When port
+ * selection isn't used (see above) STMSPER applies to all
+ * 32 channel group available, hence setting all 32 bits to 1
+ */
+ drvdata->stmsper = ~0x0;
+
+ /*
+ * Select arbitrary value to start with. If there is a conflict
+ * with other tracers the framework will deal with it.
+ */
+ drvdata->traceid = 0x20;
+
+ /* Set invariant transaction timing on all channels */
+ bitmap_clear(drvdata->chs.guaranteed, 0, drvdata->numsp);
+}
+
+static void stm_init_generic_data(struct stm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ drvdata->stm.name = dev_name(drvdata->dev);
+ drvdata->stm.mstatic = true;
+ drvdata->stm.sw_nchannels = drvdata->numsp;
+ drvdata->stm.packet = stm_generic_packet;
+ drvdata->stm.link = stm_generic_link;
+ drvdata->stm.unlink = stm_generic_unlink;
+ drvdata->stm.set_options = stm_generic_set_options;
+ drvdata->stm.get_options = stm_generic_get_options;
+}
+
+static int stm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
+{
+ int ret;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ unsigned long *guaranteed;
+ struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
+ struct coresight_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata;
+ struct resource *res = &adev->res;
+ struct resource ch_res;
+ size_t res_size, bitmap_size;
+ struct coresight_desc *desc;
+ struct device_node *np = adev->dev.of_node;
+
+ if (np) {
+ pdata = of_get_coresight_platform_data(dev, np);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata))
+ return PTR_ERR(pdata);
+ adev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
+ }
+ drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!drvdata)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ drvdata->dev = &adev->dev;
+ drvdata->atclk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, "atclk"); /* optional */
+ if (!IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk)) {
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->atclk);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
+
+ base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+ drvdata->base = base;
+
+ ret = stm_get_resource_byname(np, "stm-stimulus-base", &ch_res);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &ch_res);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+ drvdata->chs.base = base;
+
+ drvdata->write_64bit = stm_fundamental_data_size(drvdata);
+
+ if (boot_nr_channel)
+ drvdata->numsp = boot_nr_channel;
+ else
+ drvdata->numsp = stm_num_stimulus_port(drvdata);
+ res_size = min((resource_size_t)(drvdata->numsp *
+ BYTES_PER_CHANNEL), resource_size(&ch_res));
+ drvdata->numsp = res_size / BYTES_PER_CHANNEL;
+
+ bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(drvdata->numsp) * sizeof(long);
+ guaranteed = devm_kzalloc(dev, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!guaranteed)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ drvdata->chs.guaranteed = guaranteed;
+
+ spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ stm_init_default_data(drvdata);
+ stm_init_generic_data(drvdata);
+
+ if (stm_register_device(dev, &drvdata->stm, THIS_MODULE)) {
+ dev_info(dev, "stm_register_device failed, probing deffered\n");
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ }
+
+ desc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!desc) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto stm_unregister;
+ }
+
+ desc->type = CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE;
+ desc->subtype.source_subtype = CORESIGHT_DEV_SUBTYPE_SOURCE_SOFTWARE;
+ desc->ops = &stm_cs_ops;
+ desc->pdata = pdata;
+ desc->dev = dev;
+ desc->groups = coresight_stm_groups;
+ drvdata->csdev = coresight_register(desc);
+ if (IS_ERR(drvdata->csdev)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
+ goto stm_unregister;
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_put(&adev->dev);
+
+ dev_info(dev, "%s initialized\n", (char *)id->data);
+ return 0;
+
+stm_unregister:
+ stm_unregister_device(&drvdata->stm);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int stm_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
+
+ stm_unregister_device(&drvdata->stm);
+ coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int stm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (drvdata && !IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
+ clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->atclk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct stm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (drvdata && !IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
+ clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->atclk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops stm_dev_pm_ops = {
+ SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(stm_runtime_suspend, stm_runtime_resume, NULL)
+};
+
+static struct amba_id stm_ids[] = {
+ {
+ .id = 0x0003b962,
+ .mask = 0x0003ffff,
+ .data = "STM32",
+ },
+ { 0, 0},
+};
+
+static struct amba_driver stm_driver = {
+ .drv = {
+ .name = "coresight-stm",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pm = &stm_dev_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = stm_probe,
+ .remove = stm_remove,
+ .id_table = stm_ids,
+};
+
+module_amba_driver(stm_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CoreSight System Trace Macrocell driver");
diff --git a/include/linux/coresight-stm.h b/include/linux/coresight-stm.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a978bb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/coresight-stm.h
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef __LINUX_CORESIGHT_STM_H_
+#define __LINUX_CORESIGHT_STM_H_
+
+#include <uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h>
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h b/include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fa35f0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/coresight-stm.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#ifndef __UAPI_CORESIGHT_STM_H_
+#define __UAPI_CORESIGHT_STM_H_
+
+#define STM_FLAG_TIMESTAMPED BIT(3)
+#define STM_FLAG_GUARANTEED BIT(7)
+
+enum {
+ STM_OPTION_GUARANTEED = 0,
+ STM_OPTION_INVARIANT,
+};
+
+#endif
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 14:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component |
| Message-ID | <qYOja-ED-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1325032 |
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +static inline void __raw_writeq(u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + asm volatile("strd %1, %0"
> + : "+Qo" (*(volatile u64 __force *)addr)
> + : "r" (val));
> +}
Is it really ok to do this for all !64bit arms, inside a driver, just
like that? I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure there's more to it.
Regards,
--
Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 15:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM component |
| Message-ID | <qYPIf-1t6-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327660 |
On Friday 05 February 2016 15:06:20 Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > +static inline void __raw_writeq(u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> > +{
> > + asm volatile("strd %1, %0"
> > + : "+Qo" (*(volatile u64 __force *)addr)
> > + : "r" (val));
> > +}
>
> Is it really ok to do this for all !64bit arms, inside a driver, just
> like that? I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure there's more to it.
It's normally device dependent whether this works or not, on 32-bit
architectures, a 64-bit access to an I/O bus tends to get split into
two 32 bit accesses and the order might not be the as what was
intended.
We have functions in include/linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h
and include/linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h that are meant to
do this right. Maybe the driver can be changed to use whichever
one is correct for it.
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web