Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1323425 > unrolled thread
| Started by | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-01 20:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-01 21:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy riel@redhat.com - 2016-02-01 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-02-01 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 21:10 +0100
| From | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 20:30 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy |
| Message-ID | <qXskG-7wZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
After removing __acct_update_integrals from the profile,
native_sched_clock remains as the top CPU user. This can be
reduced by only calling account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time
once per jiffy for long running tasks on nohz_full CPUs.
This will reduce timing accuracy on nohz_full CPUs to jiffy
based sampling, just like on normal CPUs. It results in
totally removing native_sched_clock from the profile, and
significantly speeding up the syscall entry and exit path,
as well as irq entry and exit, and kvm guest entry & exit.
This code relies on another CPU advancing jiffies when the
system is busy. On a nohz_full system, this is done by a
housekeeping CPU.
A microbenchmark calling an invalid syscall number 10 million
times in a row speeds up an additional 30% over the numbers
with just the previous patches, for a total speedup of about
40% over 4.4 and 4.5-rc1.
Run times for the microbenchmark:
4.4 3.8 seconds
4.5-rc1 3.7 seconds
4.5-rc1 + first patch 3.3 seconds
4.5-rc1 + first 3 patches 3.1 seconds
4.5-rc1 + all patches 2.3 seconds
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a10494a94cc3..019c3af98503 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1532,6 +1532,7 @@ struct task_struct {
struct prev_cputime prev_cputime;
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
seqcount_t vtime_seqcount;
+ unsigned long vtime_jiffies;
unsigned long long vtime_snap;
enum {
/* Task is sleeping or running in a CPU with VTIME inactive */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index b2ab2ffb1adc..923c110319b1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -668,6 +668,15 @@ void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime
#endif /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE */
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
+static bool vtime_jiffies_changed(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long now)
+{
+ if (tsk->vtime_jiffies == jiffies)
+ return false;
+
+ tsk->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
+ return true;
+}
+
static unsigned long long vtime_delta(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
unsigned long long clock;
@@ -699,6 +708,9 @@ static void __vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
void vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ if (!vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies))
+ return;
+
write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
__vtime_account_system(tsk);
write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
@@ -707,7 +719,8 @@ void vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
void vtime_gen_account_irq_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
- __vtime_account_system(tsk);
+ if (vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies))
+ __vtime_account_system(tsk);
if (context_tracking_in_user())
tsk->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_USER;
write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
@@ -718,16 +731,19 @@ void vtime_account_user(struct task_struct *tsk)
cputime_t delta_cpu;
write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
- delta_cpu = get_vtime_delta(tsk);
tsk->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_SYS;
- account_user_time(tsk, delta_cpu, cputime_to_scaled(delta_cpu));
+ if (vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies)) {
+ delta_cpu = get_vtime_delta(tsk);
+ account_user_time(tsk, delta_cpu, cputime_to_scaled(delta_cpu));
+ }
write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
}
void vtime_user_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
- __vtime_account_system(tsk);
+ if (vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies))
+ __vtime_account_system(tsk);
tsk->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_USER;
write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
}
@@ -742,7 +758,8 @@ void vtime_guest_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
* that can thus safely catch up with a tickless delta.
*/
write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
- __vtime_account_system(tsk);
+ if (vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies))
+ __vtime_account_system(tsk);
current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
}
@@ -759,8 +776,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vtime_guest_exit);
void vtime_account_idle(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- cputime_t delta_cpu = get_vtime_delta(tsk);
+ cputime_t delta_cpu;
+
+ if (!vtime_jiffies_changed(tsk, jiffies))
+ return;
+ delta_cpu = get_vtime_delta(tsk);
account_idle_time(delta_cpu);
}
@@ -773,6 +794,7 @@ void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
write_seqcount_begin(¤t->vtime_seqcount);
current->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_SYS;
current->vtime_snap = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+ current->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
write_seqcount_end(¤t->vtime_seqcount);
}
@@ -784,6 +806,7 @@ void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *t, int cpu)
write_seqcount_begin(&t->vtime_seqcount);
t->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_SYS;
t->vtime_snap = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+ t->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
write_seqcount_end(&t->vtime_seqcount);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
--
2.5.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy |
| Message-ID | <qXsXo-85A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1323425 |
On 02/01/2016 03:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:21 -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>> +static bool vtime_jiffies_changed(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long now)
>> +{
>> + if (tsk->vtime_jiffies == jiffies)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + tsk->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
>> + return true;
>> +}
>
> I am guessing you intended to use 'now' instead of jiffies ?
Yes indeed. Good catch.
I have fixed this up in my local tree, and will wait for
more people's comments before sending out a v5 (tomorrow?).
--
All rights reversed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,time: only call account_{user,sys,guest,idle}_time once a jiffy |
| Message-ID | <qXsXo-85A-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1323425 |
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:21 -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
> +static bool vtime_jiffies_changed(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long now)
> +{
> + if (tsk->vtime_jiffies == jiffies)
> + return false;
> +
> + tsk->vtime_jiffies = jiffies;
> + return true;
> +}
I am guessing you intended to use 'now' instead of jiffies ?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web