Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1320106 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-28 00:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-29 04:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-28 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-28 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-28 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-29 04:40 +0100
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data |
| Message-ID | <qVHeb-2ip-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Monday, January 25, 2016 10:33:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > There is a little race discovered by Juri, where we are able to: > - create and read a sysfs file before policy->governor_data is being set > to a non NULL value. > OR > - set policy->governor_data to NULL, and reading a file before being > destroyed. > > And so such a crash is reported: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c > pgd = edfc8000 > [0000000c] *pgd=bfc8c835 > Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] SMP ARM > Modules linked in: > CPU: 4 PID: 1730 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.5.0-rc1+ #463 > Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express > task: ee8e8480 ti: ee930000 task.ti: ee930000 > PC is at show_ignore_nice_load_gov_pol+0x24/0x34 > LR is at show+0x4c/0x60 > pc : [<c058f1bc>] lr : [<c058ae88>] psr: a0070013 > sp : ee931dd0 ip : ee931de0 fp : ee931ddc > r10: ee4bc290 r9 : 00001000 r8 : ef2cb000 > r7 : ee4bc200 r6 : ef2cb000 r5 : c0af57b0 r4 : ee4bc2e0 > r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : c0928df4 r0 : ef2cb000 > Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none > Control: 10c5387d Table: adfc806a DAC: 00000051 > Process cat (pid: 1730, stack limit = 0xee930210) > Stack: (0xee931dd0 to 0xee932000) > 1dc0: ee931dfc ee931de0 c058ae88 c058f1a4 > 1de0: edce3bc0 c07bfca4 edce3ac0 00001000 ee931e24 ee931e00 c01fcb90 c058ae48 > 1e00: 00000001 edce3bc0 00000000 00000001 ee931e50 ee8ff480 ee931e34 ee931e28 > 1e20: c01fb33c c01fcb0c ee931e8c ee931e38 c01a5210 c01fb314 ee931e9c ee931e48 > 1e40: 00000000 edce3bf0 befe4a00 ee931f78 00000000 00000000 000001e4 00000000 > 1e60: c00545a8 edce3ac0 00001000 00001000 befe4a00 ee931f78 00000000 00001000 > 1e80: ee931ed4 ee931e90 c01fbed8 c01a5038 ed085a58 00020000 00000000 00000000 > 1ea0: c0ad72e4 ee931f78 ee8ff488 ee8ff480 c077f3fc 00001000 befe4a00 ee931f78 > 1ec0: 00000000 00001000 ee931f44 ee931ed8 c017c328 c01fbdc4 00001000 00000000 > 1ee0: ee8ff480 00001000 ee931f44 ee931ef8 c017c65c c03deb10 ee931fac ee931f08 > 1f00: c0009270 c001f290 c0a8d968 ef2cb000 ef2cb000 ee8ff480 00000020 ee8ff480 > 1f20: ee8ff480 befe4a00 00001000 ee931f78 00000000 00000000 ee931f74 ee931f48 > 1f40: c017d1ec c017c2f8 c019c724 c019c684 ee8ff480 ee8ff480 00001000 befe4a00 > 1f60: 00000000 00000000 ee931fa4 ee931f78 c017d2a8 c017d160 00000000 00000000 > 1f80: 000a9f20 00001000 befe4a00 00000003 c000ffe4 ee930000 00000000 ee931fa8 > 1fa0: c000fe40 c017d264 000a9f20 00001000 00000003 befe4a00 00001000 00000000 > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c > 1fc0: 000a9f20 00001000 befe4a00 00000003 00000000 00000000 00000003 00000001 > pgd = edfc4000 > [0000000c] *pgd=bfcac835 > 1fe0: 00000000 befe49dc 000197f8 b6e35dfc 60070010 00000003 3065b49d 134ac2c9 > > [<c058f1bc>] (show_ignore_nice_load_gov_pol) from [<c058ae88>] (show+0x4c/0x60) > [<c058ae88>] (show) from [<c01fcb90>] (sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x90/0xfc) > [<c01fcb90>] (sysfs_kf_seq_show) from [<c01fb33c>] (kernfs_seq_show+0x34/0x38) > [<c01fb33c>] (kernfs_seq_show) from [<c01a5210>] (seq_read+0x1e4/0x4e4) > [<c01a5210>] (seq_read) from [<c01fbed8>] (kernfs_fop_read+0x120/0x1a0) > [<c01fbed8>] (kernfs_fop_read) from [<c017c328>] (__vfs_read+0x3c/0xe0) > [<c017c328>] (__vfs_read) from [<c017d1ec>] (vfs_read+0x98/0x104) > [<c017d1ec>] (vfs_read) from [<c017d2a8>] (SyS_read+0x50/0x90) > [<c017d2a8>] (SyS_read) from [<c000fe40>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c) > Code: e5903044 e1a00001 e3081df4 e34c1092 (e593300c) > ---[ end trace 5994b9a5111f35ee ]--- > > Fix that by making sure, policy->governor_data is updated at the right > places only. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2+ > Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> So I've applied this, but I'm not sure it is sufficient yet. Have you double checked whether or not stuff cannot be reordered by the CPU and/or the compiler and no additional memory barriers are needed? Rafael
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 03:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data |
| Message-ID | <qVKlH-4HL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320106 |
On 27-01-16, 23:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So I've applied this, but I'm not sure it is sufficient yet. At least, this solves the crash Juri was hitting on a multi cluster box. > Have you double checked whether or not stuff cannot be reordered by > the CPU and/or the compiler and no additional memory barriers are needed? I don't think CPU will reorder things before a function call. It can reorder lines, which CPU thinks aren't related but it can't assume the same in this case. We have tons of code like this. @Juri: What do you say? -- viresh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix NULL reference crash while accessing policy->governor_data |
| Message-ID | <qVSjg-28z-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320225 |
On 28/01/16 07:45, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-01-16, 23:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > So I've applied this, but I'm not sure it is sufficient yet. > > At least, this solves the crash Juri was hitting on a multi cluster > box. > > > Have you double checked whether or not stuff cannot be reordered by > > the CPU and/or the compiler and no additional memory barriers are needed? > > I don't think CPU will reorder things before a function call. It can > reorder lines, which CPU thinks aren't related but it can't assume the > same in this case. We have tons of code like this. > > @Juri: What do you say? > Yeah, it looks good on my boxes (even though I'll run some more tests later today). I'm not entirely sure either about the reordering, but reordering across a function call (of a different compilation unit) seems quite unlikely to me as well. Best, - Juri
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qW84G-56O-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320225 |
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 07:45:53 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-01-16, 23:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > So I've applied this, but I'm not sure it is sufficient yet. > > At least, this solves the crash Juri was hitting on a multi cluster > box. Yes, it makes the crash go away in his setup. > > Have you double checked whether or not stuff cannot be reordered by > > the CPU and/or the compiler and no additional memory barriers are needed? > > I don't think CPU will reorder things before a function call. It can do that in theory. First of all, functions may be inlined by the compiler. Second, even if they aren't, the call instruction only means "take the next instruction from that other location in memory" to the CPU and the instructions following the call go into the pipeline along with the ones preceding it and they may be reordered in the process. > It can reorder lines, Not lines, but instructions. > which CPU thinks aren't related but it can't assume the > same in this case. We have tons of code like this. Code that relies on specific ordering of instructions executed by different CPUs for correctness usually requires memory barriers. Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web