Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1317724 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-26 11:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-26 21:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] genirq: fix trigger flags check for shared irqs Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> - 2016-01-26 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] genirq: fix trigger flags check for shared irqs Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-26 21:50 +0100
| From | Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 11:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] genirq: fix trigger flags check for shared irqs |
| Message-ID | <qV9cu-2Od-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
For shared interrupts, if one requester passes in any IRQF_TRIGGER_*
flags whilst another doesn't, __setup_irq() can erroneously fail.
The no-flags case should be treated as "already configured", so change
__setup_irq() to only check that the flags match if any have been
provided.
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index a79d267..032c8fa 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -995,14 +995,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
old = *old_ptr;
if (old) {
/*
- * Can't share interrupts unless both agree to and are
- * the same type (level, edge, polarity). So both flag
- * fields must have IRQF_SHARED set and the bits which
- * set the trigger type must match. Also all must
- * agree on ONESHOT.
+ * Can't share interrupts unless both agree to and all
+ * must agree on ONESHOT
*/
if (!((old->flags & new->flags) & IRQF_SHARED) ||
- ((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) ||
((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_ONESHOT))
goto mismatch;
@@ -1014,6 +1010,15 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
/* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
do {
/*
+ * If 'new' requests a trigger type it must match all
+ * previously requested trigger types.
+ */
+ if (((new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) &&
+ (old->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)) &&
+ ((new->flags ^ old->flags) & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK))
+ goto mismatch;
+
+ /*
* Or all existing action->thread_mask bits,
* so we can find the next zero bit for this
* new action.
--
1.7.9.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qViIN-1ad-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1317724 |
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Brian Starkey wrote: > For shared interrupts, if one requester passes in any IRQF_TRIGGER_* > flags whilst another doesn't, __setup_irq() can erroneously fail. > > The no-flags case should be treated as "already configured", so change > __setup_irq() to only check that the flags match if any have been > provided. What happens if that "already configured", i.e. the default setting, is conflicting with the newly requested interrupt? I rather prefer the failure than the resulting silent wreckage. Thanks, tglx
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web