Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1298170 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 09:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-26 22:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 14:40 +0100
      [PATCH v2] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 14:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-12-28 03:50 +0100

#1298170 — [PATCH] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator

We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
the variable "pos" which is not required now.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index d72ac1f..3619ce4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -189,23 +189,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_direction);
  */
 static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-	struct list_head *pos;
 	struct gpio_chip *iterator;
 	struct gpio_chip *previous = NULL;
 
 	if (list_empty(&gpio_chips)) {
-		pos = gpio_chips.next;
-		goto found;
+		list_add_tail(&chip->list, &gpio_chips);
+		return 0;
 	}
 
-	list_for_each(pos, &gpio_chips) {
-		iterator = list_entry(pos, struct gpio_chip, list);
+	list_for_each_entry(iterator, &gpio_chips, list) {
 		if (iterator->base >= chip->base + chip->ngpio) {
 			/*
 			 * Iterator is the first GPIO chip so there is no
 			 * previous one
 			 */
-			if (previous == NULL) {
+			if (!previous) {
 				goto found;
 			} else {
 				/*
@@ -230,7 +228,7 @@ static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	return -EBUSY;
 
 found:
-	list_add_tail(&chip->list, pos);
+	list_add_tail(&chip->list, &iterator->list);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1298273

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:

> We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
> Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
> the variable "pos" which is not required now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>

Aha there is a real patch solving the problem. Sorry Ross,
had to drop your patch and replace it with this.

Patch applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1298391

On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
> > Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
> > the variable "pos" which is not required now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> 
> Aha there is a real patch solving the problem. Sorry Ross,
> had to drop your patch and replace it with this.
> 
> Patch applied!

oops .. i think i have a small mistake in the patch. After the loop for
list_for_each_entry ends we are having:
        if (iterator->base + iterator->ngpio <= chip->base)
	                goto found;

But at the end of the loop iterator will point to head. The condition in
the loop is &pos->member != (head).
I am sending v2 as reply to this thread. It will be great if you can
review and apply that instead of this one.
Sorry for the inconvenience. I guess christmas effect. :)

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1298394 — [PATCH v2] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator

We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
the variable "pos" which is not required now.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---

v1: at the end of the loop iterator will point to head and we are trying
to check its field.

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index d72ac1f..6972b4e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -189,23 +189,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_direction);
  */
 static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
-	struct list_head *pos;
 	struct gpio_chip *iterator;
 	struct gpio_chip *previous = NULL;
 
 	if (list_empty(&gpio_chips)) {
-		pos = gpio_chips.next;
-		goto found;
+		list_add_tail(&chip->list, &gpio_chips);
+		return 0;
 	}
 
-	list_for_each(pos, &gpio_chips) {
-		iterator = list_entry(pos, struct gpio_chip, list);
+	list_for_each_entry(iterator, &gpio_chips, list) {
 		if (iterator->base >= chip->base + chip->ngpio) {
 			/*
 			 * Iterator is the first GPIO chip so there is no
 			 * previous one
 			 */
-			if (previous == NULL) {
+			if (!previous) {
 				goto found;
 			} else {
 				/*
@@ -221,7 +219,13 @@ static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 		previous = iterator;
 	}
 
-	/* We are beyond the last chip in the list */
+	/*
+	 * We are beyond the last chip in the list and iterator now
+	 * points to the head.
+	 * Let iterator point to the last chip in the list.
+	 */
+
+	iterator = list_last_entry(&gpio_chips, struct gpio_chip, list);
 	if (iterator->base + iterator->ngpio <= chip->base)
 		goto found;
 
@@ -230,7 +234,7 @@ static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	return -EBUSY;
 
 found:
-	list_add_tail(&chip->list, pos);
+	list_add_tail(&chip->list, &iterator->list);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1298442 — Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: fix warning about iterator

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:

> We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
> Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
> the variable "pos" which is not required now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
>
> v1: at the end of the loop iterator will point to head and we are trying
> to check its field.

OK took the v1 out and applied this version instead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web