Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1296402 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular

Started byPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
First post2015-12-22 02:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-22 17:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-22 02:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-12-22 09:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-22 17:30 +0100

#1296402 — [PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular

FromPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date2015-12-22 02:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] drivers/pci: make host/pcie-rcar.c explicitly non-modular
Message-ID<qIjsZ-5iB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:

drivers/pci/host/Kconfig:config PCI_RCAR_GEN2_PCIE
drivers/pci/host/Kconfig:       bool "Renesas R-Car PCIe controller"

...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.

Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.

Since module_platform_driver() uses the same init level priority as
builtin_platform_driver() the init ordering remains unchanged with
this commit.

We don't have to disallow a driver unbind, since that is already
done for us in this driver.

Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.

We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
was (or is now) contained at the top of the file in the comments.

Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Acked-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
 drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
index 5c2962646b17..a8ff4a7383e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
  *  arch/sh/drivers/pci/ops-sh7786.c
  *  Copyright (C) 2009 - 2011  Paul Mundt
  *
+ * Module Author: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
+ *
  * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
  * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
  * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
@@ -18,7 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/msi.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
@@ -921,7 +923,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id rcar_pcie_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "renesas,pcie-r8a7795", .data = rcar_pcie_hw_init },
 	{},
 };
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcar_pcie_of_match);
 
 static void rcar_pcie_release_of_pci_ranges(struct rcar_pcie *pci)
 {
@@ -1039,8 +1040,4 @@ static struct platform_driver rcar_pcie_driver = {
 	},
 	.probe = rcar_pcie_probe,
 };
-module_platform_driver(rcar_pcie_driver);
-
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Renesas R-Car PCIe driver");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+builtin_platform_driver(rcar_pcie_driver);
-- 
2.6.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1296615

FromGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date2015-12-22 09:40 +0100
Message-ID<qIqEa-1y3-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1296402
Hi Paul,

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> was (or is now) contained at the top of the file in the comments.

The MODULE_* tags are easier to parse by automated tools.
Do we want to make the work of e.g. the SPDX people harder?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1296883

FromPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date2015-12-22 17:30 +0100
Message-ID<qIxZ1-6go-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1296615
On 2015-12-22 03:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
>> was (or is now) contained at the top of the file in the comments.
> 
> The MODULE_* tags are easier to parse by automated tools.
> Do we want to make the work of e.g. the SPDX people harder?

As JoeP pointed out, the AUTHOR tags are routinely out of date
and not used by get_maintainer.pl by default, and I've found a
lot of LICENCE tags that say GPL while the text at the top says
GPLv2.  On top of that, they are not present all the time since
proper non-modular drivers don't have them.  So, no I have no
problems whatsoever in removing them from non-modular code.

If you want to make the case for tags that are module/non-module
agnostic, and you think there is genuine value in it and you can
get buy in on that, then feel free.

Paul.
--

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web