Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1295252 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2015-12-19 01:50 +0100
Last post2015-12-22 09:10 +0100
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure  path in wilc_wlan_cleanup() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-12-19 01:50 +0100
    [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup() Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2015-12-20 22:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure  path in wilc_wlan_cleanup() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-12-21 22:30 +0100
        [PATCH v3] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup() Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2015-12-22 18:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure  path in wilc_wlan_cleanup() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-12-22 09:10 +0100

#1295252 — Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2015-12-19 01:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()
Message-ID<qHdSG-4si-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 01:04:34AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> If hif_read_reg() or hif_write_reg() fail in wilc_wlan_cleanup(),
> it calls release_bus() and continues execution. But it leads to double
> release_bus() call that means double unlock of g_linux_wlan->hif_cs mutex.
> 
> The patch adds return in case of failure.
> 
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

No longer applies to my tree, can you rebase it against staging-testing
and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1295697 — [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()

FromAlexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Date2015-12-20 22:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()
Message-ID<qHU1z-63P-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1295252
If hif_read_reg() or hif_write_reg() fail in wilc_wlan_cleanup(),
it calls release_bus() and continues execution. But it leads to double
release_bus() call that means double unlock of g_linux_wlan->hif_cs mutex.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
index a73e99f..4b7c8e9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
@@ -1459,15 +1459,16 @@ void wilc_wlan_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
 	ret = p->hif_func.hif_read_reg(wilc, WILC_GP_REG_0, &reg);
 	if (!ret) {
 		PRINT_ER("Error while reading reg\n");
-		release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
+		goto _unlock;
 	}
 	PRINT_ER("Writing ABORT reg\n");
 	ret = p->hif_func.hif_write_reg(wilc, WILC_GP_REG_0,
 					(reg | ABORT_INT));
 	if (!ret) {
 		PRINT_ER("Error while writing reg\n");
-		release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
+		goto _unlock;
 	}
+_unlock:
 	release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
 	p->hif_func.hif_deinit(NULL);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1296219

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2015-12-21 22:30 +0100
Message-ID<qIgbM-3lp-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1295697
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> If hif_read_reg() or hif_write_reg() fail in wilc_wlan_cleanup(),
> it calls release_bus() and continues execution. But it leads to double
> release_bus() call that means double unlock of g_linux_wlan->hif_cs mutex.
> 
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>

Doesn't apply to my tree anymore, can you rebase this on the
staging-testing branch of staging.git?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1296931 — [PATCH v3] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()

FromAlexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Date2015-12-22 18:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH v3] staging: wilc1000: fix double mutex_unlock on failure path in wilc_wlan_cleanup()
Message-ID<qIzep-6Xt-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1296219
If hif_read_reg() or hif_write_reg() fail in wilc_wlan_cleanup(),
it calls release_bus() and continues execution. But it leads to double
release_bus() call that means double unlock of g_linux_wlan->hif_cs mutex.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
index 83af51b..b8c4a63 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
@@ -1381,15 +1381,16 @@ void wilc_wlan_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
 	ret = wilc->hif_func->hif_read_reg(wilc, WILC_GP_REG_0, &reg);
 	if (!ret) {
 		PRINT_ER("Error while reading reg\n");
-		release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 	PRINT_ER("Writing ABORT reg\n");
 	ret = wilc->hif_func->hif_write_reg(wilc, WILC_GP_REG_0,
 					(reg | ABORT_INT));
 	if (!ret) {
 		PRINT_ER("Error while writing reg\n");
-		release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
+		goto unlock;
 	}
+unlock:
 	release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
 	wilc->hif_func->hif_deinit(NULL);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1296607

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2015-12-22 09:10 +0100
Message-ID<qIqba-1nm-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1295697
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> index a73e99f..4b7c8e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> @@ -1459,15 +1459,16 @@ void wilc_wlan_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
>  	ret = p->hif_func.hif_read_reg(wilc, WILC_GP_REG_0, &reg);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		PRINT_ER("Error while reading reg\n");
> -		release_bus(wilc, RELEASE_ALLOW_SLEEP);
> +		goto _unlock;

If you're redoing this anyway, could we get rid of the underscore in the
label name?  Just unlock: is fine.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web