Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1286107 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver

Started byFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
First post2015-12-08 00:40 +0100
Last post2015-12-08 00:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> - 2015-12-08 00:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> - 2015-12-08 00:50 +0100

#1286107 — Re: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver

FromFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Date2015-12-08 00:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver
Message-ID<qDdxU-2Vw-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 2015-12-07 23:58, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> +/* RRD (Receive Return Descriptor) */
> +union emac_rrd {
> +	struct {
> +		/* 32bit word 0 */
> +		u32  xsum:16;
> +		u32  nor:4;       /* number of RFD */
> +		u32  si:12;       /* start index of rfd-ring */
> +		/* 32bit word 1 */
> +		u32  hash;
> +		/* 32bit word 2 */
You should never use bitfields for hardware structs.
I think in general, kernel code should be made endian safe, even if you
only care about one particular endian type for your platform.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1286111

FromGilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>
Date2015-12-08 00:50 +0100
Message-ID<qDdHz-2YK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1286107
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 00:33:04 +0100
Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:


> On 2015-12-07 23:58, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> > +/* RRD (Receive Return Descriptor) */
> > +union emac_rrd {
> > +	struct {
> > +		/* 32bit word 0 */
> > +		u32  xsum:16;
> > +		u32  nor:4;       /* number of RFD */
> > +		u32  si:12;       /* start index of rfd-ring */
> > +		/* 32bit word 1 */
> > +		u32  hash;
> > +		/* 32bit word 2 */
> You should never use bitfields for hardware structs.
> I think in general, kernel code should be made endian safe, even if
> you only care about one particular endian type for your platform.
> 
> - Felix

Thank you Felix,
I will change the bit fields to bitwise operations and macros.

Gilad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web