Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1287656 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] ARM: pxa: cm-x2xx: avoid duplicate macro warnings

Started byArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
First post2015-12-09 18:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-09 22:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] ARM: pxa: cm-x2xx: avoid duplicate macro warnings Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-09 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: cm-x2xx: avoid duplicate macro warnings Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2015-12-09 22:10 +0100

#1287656 — [PATCH] ARM: pxa: cm-x2xx: avoid duplicate macro warnings

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2015-12-09 18:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] ARM: pxa: cm-x2xx: avoid duplicate macro warnings
Message-ID<qDQfX-2uA-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
In an old commit, we worked around the duplicate definition of
GPIO24_SSP1_SFRM in cm-x2xx.c, which includes files for both
pxa25x and pxa27x. Apparently the problem has come back and we
now have four additional duplicate symbols that cause warnings:

In file included from /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.h:7:0,
                 from /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c:27:
/git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mfp-pxa27x.h:21:0: warning: "GPIO86_GPIO" redefined
 #define GPIO86_GPIO  MFP_CFG_IN(GPIO86, AF0)

This uses the same hack as before and undefines all symbols that
are defined more than once. Fortunately, cm-x2xx does not need
any of these.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c
index f2d801160079..7202022ee243 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c
@@ -24,7 +24,16 @@
 
 #include "pxa25x.h"
 #undef GPIO24_SSP1_SFRM
+#undef GPIO86_GPIO
+#undef GPIO87_GPIO
+#undef GPIO88_GPIO
+#undef GPIO89_GPIO
 #include "pxa27x.h"
+#undef GPIO24_SSP1_SFRM
+#undef GPIO86_GPIO
+#undef GPIO87_GPIO
+#undef GPIO88_GPIO
+#undef GPIO89_GPIO
 #include <mach/audio.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/video-pxafb.h>
 #include <mach/smemc.h>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1287864

FromRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Date2015-12-09 22:10 +0100
Message-ID<qDU9R-5bQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1287656
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> In an old commit, we worked around the duplicate definition of
> GPIO24_SSP1_SFRM in cm-x2xx.c, which includes files for both
> pxa25x and pxa27x. Apparently the problem has come back and we
> now have four additional duplicate symbols that cause warnings:
>
> In file included from /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.h:7:0,
>                  from /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx.c:27:
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mfp-pxa27x.h:21:0: warning: "GPIO86_GPIO" redefined
>  #define GPIO86_GPIO  MFP_CFG_IN(GPIO86, AF0)
>
> This uses the same hack as before and undefines all symbols that
> are defined more than once. Fortunately, cm-x2xx does not need
> any of these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Digging out old patches of 2012, cool.
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

I suppose it's a necessary hack until I manage to kill the mfp interface in
favor of pinctrl.

Cheers.

--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web