Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1287159 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access

Started byBhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
First post2015-12-09 08:00 +0100
Last post2015-12-10 05:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> - 2015-12-09 08:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-09 21:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> - 2015-12-10 05:50 +0100

#1287159 — [PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access

FromBhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
Date2015-12-09 08:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access
Message-ID<qDGTf-4SH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
DSPI instances in Vybrid have a different amount of chip selects
and CTARs (Clock and transfer Attributes Register). In case of
DSPI1 we only have 2 CTAR registers and 4 CS. In present driver
implementation CTAR offset is derived from CS instance which will
lead to out of bound access if chip select instance is greater than
CTAR register instance, hence use single CTAR0 register for all CS
instances. Since we write the CTAR register anyway before each access,
there is no value in using the additional CTAR registers. Also one
should not program a value in CTAS for a CTAR register that is not
present, hence configure CTAS to use CTAR0.

Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
index 01fa95b..b21c3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline int is_double_byte_mode(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
 {
 	unsigned int val;
 
-	regmap_read(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(dspi->cs), &val);
+	regmap_read(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(0), &val);
 
 	return ((val & SPI_FRAME_BITS_MASK) == SPI_FRAME_BITS(8)) ? 0 : 1;
 }
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int dspi_transfer_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
 	 */
 	if (tx_word && (dspi->len == 1)) {
 		dspi->dataflags |= TRAN_STATE_WORD_ODD_NUM;
-		regmap_update_bits(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(dspi->cs),
+		regmap_update_bits(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(0),
 				SPI_FRAME_BITS_MASK, SPI_FRAME_BITS(8));
 		tx_word = 0;
 	}
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int dspi_transfer_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
 
 			dspi_pushr = SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(d16) |
 				SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
-				SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(dspi->cs) |
+				SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0) |
 				SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
 
 			dspi->len -= 2;
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int dspi_transfer_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
 
 			dspi_pushr = SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(d8) |
 				SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
-				SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(dspi->cs) |
+				SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0) |
 				SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
 
 			dspi->len--;
@@ -365,10 +365,10 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
 		regmap_update_bits(dspi->regmap, SPI_MCR,
 				SPI_MCR_CLR_TXF | SPI_MCR_CLR_RXF,
 				SPI_MCR_CLR_TXF | SPI_MCR_CLR_RXF);
-		regmap_write(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(dspi->cs),
+		regmap_write(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(0),
 				dspi->cur_chip->ctar_val);
 		if (transfer->speed_hz)
-			regmap_write(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(dspi->cs),
+			regmap_write(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(0),
 					dspi->cur_chip->ctar_val);
 
 		regmap_write(dspi->regmap, SPI_RSER, SPI_RSER_EOQFE);
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dspi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
 	if (!dspi->len) {
 		if (dspi->dataflags & TRAN_STATE_WORD_ODD_NUM)
-			regmap_update_bits(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(dspi->cs),
+			regmap_update_bits(dspi->regmap, SPI_CTAR(0),
 			SPI_FRAME_BITS_MASK, SPI_FRAME_BITS(16));
 
 		dspi->waitflags = 1;
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1287843

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2015-12-09 21:50 +0100
Message-ID<qDTQu-4PM-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1287159

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:51:39AM +0530, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
> DSPI instances in Vybrid have a different amount of chip selects
> and CTARs (Clock and transfer Attributes Register). In case of
> DSPI1 we only have 2 CTAR registers and 4 CS. In present driver

This doesn't apply against, current code - please check and resend.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1288202

FromBhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
Date2015-12-10 05:50 +0100
Message-ID<qE1kZ-1fM-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1287843
On 12/10/2015 02:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:51:39AM +0530, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> DSPI instances in Vybrid have a different amount of chip selects
>> and CTARs (Clock and transfer Attributes Register). In case of
>> DSPI1 we only have 2 CTAR registers and 4 CS. In present driver
>
> This doesn't apply against, current code - please check and resend.

Will check and resend.

>

-- 
Best regards,
Bhuvan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web