Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221334 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-09 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-09 16:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/5] Add eeprom to the Olimex series of boards Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> - 2015-09-09 11:30 +0200
[PATCH 3/5] dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A20 OLinuXino Lime board Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> - 2015-09-09 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add eeprom to the Olimex series of boards Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-09-09 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add eeprom to the Olimex series of boards Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> - 2015-09-09 16:30 +0200
| From | Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/5] Add eeprom to the Olimex series of boards |
| Message-ID | <q6JRv-7mz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Some of the olimex series of boards feature a permanently connected eeprom on i2c-1. This patch series adds them on all the boards that have them according to the spec-sheets. I explicitly added my personal --Tested-by to boards I actually tested. There are two boards, that according to the sheets have them as well and physically inspecting the boards shows them clearly, I did not actually test them on those the boards that are missing the --Tested-by. So while it generally should be safe to merge those patches as well, if someone with those boards could add a --Tested-by that'd be great. Additionally, it brings the eeprom on the OLinuXino a10s in line with the rest and now follows the binding documentation. Olliver Schinagl (5): dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A10 OLinuXino Lime board dts: sunxi: correct vendor prefix on OLinuXino a10s micro dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A20 OLinuXino Lime board dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A20 OLinuXino Lime2 board dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A20 OLinuXino micro board arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-olinuxino-lime.dts | 12 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s-olinuxino-micro.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts | 12 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts | 6 ++++++ 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/5] dts: sunxi: add eeprom to A20 OLinuXino Lime board |
| Message-ID | <q6JRy-7mz-59@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1221334 |
From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
The Olimex A20 OLinuXino Lime features an eeprom that is always on the
board. This patch adds it to the dts.
--Tested-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
--Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts
index 769726d..6710d25 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime.dts
@@ -117,6 +117,18 @@
};
};
+&i2c1 {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins_a>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ eeprom: eeprom@50 {
+ compatible = "atmel,24c16";
+ reg = <0x50>;
+ pagesize = <16>;
+ };
+};
+
&mmc0 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&mmc0_pins_a>, <&mmc0_cd_pin_reference_design>;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6Oeu-5iY-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1221334 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > Some of the olimex series of boards feature a permanently connected eeprom on > i2c-1. This patch series adds them on all the boards that have them according > to the spec-sheets. > > I explicitly added my personal --Tested-by to boards I actually tested. Testing your changes is the strict minimum before testing your patches. Just like running checkpatch on them, which you clearly failed to do, otherwise you would have seen that this is not the right syntax. Drop the tested-by, fix your SoB. > There are two boards, that according to the sheets have them as well > and physically inspecting the boards shows them clearly, I did not > actually test them on those the boards that are missing the > --Tested-by. Then don't send those patches. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6OxP-5FK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1221486 |
On 09-09-15 16:05, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote: >> Some of the olimex series of boards feature a permanently connected eeprom on >> i2c-1. This patch series adds them on all the boards that have them according >> to the spec-sheets. >> >> I explicitly added my personal --Tested-by to boards I actually tested. > Testing your changes is the strict minimum before testing your > patches. Just like running checkpatch on them, which you clearly > failed to do, otherwise you would have seen that this is not the right > syntax. Drop the tested-by, fix your SoB. Actually, I did run check-patch and it complained about the format, but it was the same as when outputted with a git -s. I obviously missed something there! So I double check that. I will resubmit without a tested-by for the boards I did test it on. > >> There are two boards, that according to the sheets have them as well >> and physically inspecting the boards shows them clearly, I did not >> actually test them on those the boards that are missing the >> --Tested-by. > Then don't send those patches. I put them out there so someone could pick up on that with the least amount of effort. I will drop them > > Maxime > -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Kind regards, 与亲切的问候 Olliver Schinagl Research & Development Ultimaker B.V. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web