Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1212752 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 16 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RESEND PATCH v16 0/4] ARM: rk3288: Add PM Domain support Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> - 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200
[RESEND PATCH v16 1/4] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> - 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200
[RESEND PATCH v16 2/4] ARM: power-domain: rockchip: add all the domain type on RK3288 SoCs Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> - 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200
[RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> - 2015-08-25 09:40 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> - 2015-08-25 23:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-08-25 23:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> - 2015-08-26 00:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 01:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 02:30 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-08-28 04:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> - 2015-08-28 22:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-08-28 23:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - 2015-08-29 01:00 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 23:30 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-08-26 02:00 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> - 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200
| From | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [RESEND PATCH v16 0/4] ARM: rk3288: Add PM Domain support |
| Message-ID | <q1gQa-86J-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for
Rockchip platform, and support RK3288 SoCs.
Verified on url =
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/v3.14
localhost / # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
domain status slaves
/device runtime status
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pd_video off
/devices/ff9a0800.iommu suspended
/devices/ff9a0000.video-codec suspended
pd_vio on
/devices/ff930300.iommu suspended
/devices/ff940300.iommu suspended
/devices/ff930000.vop suspended
/devices/ff940000.vop suspended
/devices/ff980000.hdmi unsupported
/devices/rockchip-edp unsupported
pd_hevc off
pd_gpu off
/devices/ffa30000.gpu suspended
The following is the easy example.
vopb: vop@ff930000 {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-vop";
...
iommus = <&vopb_mmu>;
power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;
status = "disabled";
...
};
vopb_mmu: iommu@ff930300 {
compatible = "rockchip,iommu";
...
interrupt-names = "vopb_mmu";
power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;
#iommu-cells = <0>;
status = "disabled";
...
};
vopl: vop@ff940000 {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-vop";
reg = <0xff940000 0x19c>;
...
iommus = <&vopl_mmu>;
power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;
status = "disabled";
...
};
vopl_mmu: iommu@ff940300 {
compatible = "rockchip,iommu";
...
interrupt-names = "vopl_mmu";
power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;
#iommu-cells = <0>;
status = "disabled";
};
Others, we can verify this driver for the EDP.
We can apply the following these patchs.
6967631 New [v2,1/8] drm: exynos/dp: fix code style
6967741 New [v2,2/8] drm: exynos/dp: convert to drm bridge mode
6967801 New [v2,3/8] drm: bridge: analogix_dp: split exynos dp driver to bridge dir
6967791 New [v2,4/8] drm: rockchip/dp: add rockchip platform dp driver
6968031 New [v2,5/8] drm: bridge/analogix_dp: add platform device type support
6968141 New [v2,6/8] drm: bridge: analogix_dp: add some rk3288 special registers setting
6967941 New [v2,7/8] drm: bridge: analogix_dp: try force hpd after plug in lookup failed
6967971 New [v2,8/8] drm: bridge/analogix_dp: expand the delay time for hpd detect
There is a recent addition from Linus Walleij,
called simple-mfd [a] that is supposed to get added real early for kernel 4.2
[a]:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/commit/?id=fcf294c020ff7ee4e3b1e96159e4dc7a17ad5
Here is my branch, Tested by chromeos-3.14 and next-kernel.
2b82899 ARM: dts: add RK3288 power-domain node
69d0b5b soc: rockchip: power-domain: support power domain driver for RK3288 SoCs
66f8758 ARM: power-domain: rockchip: add all the domain type on RK3288 SoCs
c5f12a3 dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain
7a834ba Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid
0be0171 HID: wacom: Report correct device resolution when using the wireless adapater
2b9bea0 Merge tag 'mfd-fixes-4.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd
016a9f5 Merge tag 'ntb-4.2-rc7' of git://github.com/jonmason/ntb
a3ca013 Merge branch 'for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
......
Changes in v16:
- remove the pmu node.
- Add more domain decription.
- the driver type from tristate to bool.
- Letter misspelled.
- As Ulf suggestion, remove #include <linux/clk-provider.h>,
use "%pC" as the formatting string for the dev_dbg().
- As the Ulf suggestion, set the genpd->flags to assign the
->stop|start() callbacks.
- Manually copy the problem in patch v15.
- rebase the description.
Changes in v15:
- change the comment.
- As the kevin suggestion, put the power-domain driver into driver/soc/vendor.
- As Heiko suggestion, Patch 1: binding doc, 2: binding-header, 3: driver,
4: dts-changes.
- return -ENXIO --> return -ENODEV.
- As Tomasz remarked previously the dts should represent the hardware
and the power-domains are part of the pmu.
Changes in v14:
- does not need to set an owner,remove the "THIS_MODULE".
- Remove essential clocks from rk3288 PD_VIO domain, Some clocks are
essential for the system health and should not be turned down.
However there is no owner for them so if they listed as belonging to power
domain we'll try toggling them up and down during power domain transition.
As a result we either fail to suspend or resume the system.
Changes in v13:
- Remove essential clocks from rk3288 PD_VIO domain Some clocks are essential
for the system health and should not be turned down. However there is no owner
for them so if they listed as belonging to power domain we'll try toggling them
up and down during power domain.
- Device drivers expect their devices to be powered on before their
probing code is invoked. To achieve that we should start with
power domains powered on (we may turn them off later once all devices enable
runtime powermanagment and go idle).
- This change switches Rockchip power domain driver to use updated
device_attach and device_detach API.
- set the gpu/core power domain power delay time.
- fix enumerating PM clocks for devices.
- fix use after free We can't use clk after we did clk_put(clk).
Changes in v12:
- fix the title doamin->domain.
- updated device_attach and device_detach API,otherwise it will
compile fail on next kernel.
Changes in v11:
- fix pm_genpd_init(&pd->genpd, NULL, false).
Changes in v10:
- this switches over domain infos to use masks instead of recomputing
them each time and also gets rid of custom domain translator and
uses standard onecell on.
- fix missing the #include <dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h>.
- remove the notes.
Changes in v9:
- add document decription.
- fix v8 changes as follows:
- This reconciles the v2 and v7 code so that we power domain have lists of clocks
they trigger on and off during power transitions and independently from power
domains clocks. We attach clocks to devices comprising power domain and prepare
them so they are turn on and off by runtime PM.
- add rockchip_pm_add_one_domain() to control domains.
- add pd_start/pd_stop interface to control clocks.
- add decription for power-doamin node.
Changes in v8:
- document go back to v2.
- This reconciles the v2 and v7 code so that we power domain have
lists of clocks they toggle on and off during power transitions
and independently from power domains clocks we attach clocks to
devices comprising power domain and prepare them so they are
turn on and off by runtime PM.
- DTS go back to v2.
Changes in v7:
- Delete unused variables
Changes in v6:
- delete pmu_lock.
- modify dev_lock using mutex.
- pm_clk_resume(pd->dev) change to pm_clk_resume(ed->dev).
- pm_clk_suspend(pd->dev) change to pm_clk_suspend(ed->dev).
- add devm_kfree(pd->dev, de) in rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev.
Changes in v5:
- delete idle_lock.
- add timeout in rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request().
Changes in v4:
- use list storage dev.
Changes in v3:
- DT structure has changed.
- change use pm_clk_resume() and pm_clk_suspend().
- Decomposition power-controller, changed to multiple controller
(gpu-power-controller, hevc-power-controller).
Changes in v2:
- move clocks to "optional".
- remove the "pd->pd.of_node = np".
- make pd_vio clocks all one entry per line and alphabetize.
- power: power-controller move back to pinctrl: pinctrl.
Caesar Wang (4):
dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain
ARM: power-domain: rockchip: add all the domain type on RK3288 SoCs
soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add power domain driver
ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs
.../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 46 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 60 ++-
drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig | 13 +
drivers/soc/rockchip/Makefile | 4 +
drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 485 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h | 31 ++
8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/rockchip/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [RESEND PATCH v16 1/4] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain |
| Message-ID | <q1gQa-86J-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1212752 |
This add the necessary binding documentation for the power domain
found on Rockchip Socs.
Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
---
Changes in v16:
- remove the pmu node.
Changes in v15: None
Changes in v14: None
Changes in v13: None
Changes in v12: None
Changes in v11: None
Changes in v10: None
Changes in v9:
- add document decription.
Changes in v8:
- document go back to v2.
Changes in v7: None
Changes in v6: None
Changes in v5: None
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3:
- DT structure has changed.
Changes in v2:
- move clocks to "optional".
.../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..138754d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+* Rockchip Power Domains
+
+Rockchip processors include support for multiple power domains which can be
+powered up/down by software based on different application scenes to save power.
+
+Required properties for power domain controller:
+- compatible: Should be one of the following.
+ "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller" - for RK3288 SoCs.
+- #power-domain-cells: Number of cells in a power-domain specifier.
+ Should be 1 for multiple PM domains.
+- #address-cells: Should be 1.
+- #size-cells: Should be 0.
+
+Required properties for power domain sub nodes:
+- reg: index of the power domain, should use macros in:
+ "include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h" - for rk3288 type power domain.
+- clocks (optional): phandles to clocks which need to be enabled while power domain
+ switches state.
+
+Example:
+
+ power: power-controller {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller";
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ pd_gpu {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_GPU>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
+ };
+ };
+
+Node of a device using power domains must have a power-domains property,
+containing a phandle to the power device node and an index specifying which
+power domain to use.
+The index should use macros in:
+ "include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h" - for rk3288 type power domain.
+
+Example of the node using power domain:
+
+ node {
+ /* ... */
+ power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_GPU>;
+ /* ... */
+ };
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [RESEND PATCH v16 2/4] ARM: power-domain: rockchip: add all the domain type on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1gQa-86J-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1212752 |
According to a description from TRM, the following table lists all the power domains. ------------------------ ------------------------- |VD_CORE | |VD_LOGIC | PD_VIO | |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |xxxxxxxx -----------| |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |xxxxxxxx | |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | | |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |--------- -----------| | | |PD_PERI | | PD_VIDEO | | | |--------- -----------| | | |--------- -----------| | | |PD_ALIVE | | PD_HEVC | |---------- ---------- | |--------- -----------| ||PD_A17_1| |PD_A17_2| | ------------------------- |---------- ---------- | |VD_GPU |PD_GPU | |---------- ---------- | ------------------------- ||PD_A17_3| |PD_DEBUG| | ------------------------- |---------- ---------- | |VD_PMU |PD_PMU | ------------------------ ------------------------- VD_* : voltage domain PD_* : power domain At the moment, we can support some power-domain type on RK3288. We can add more types on RK3288 in the future, that's need to do. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> --- Changes in v16: - Add more domain decription. Changes in v15: - change the comment. Changes in v14: None Changes in v13: None Changes in v12: None Changes in v11: None Changes in v10: None Changes in v9: None Changes in v8: None Changes in v7: None Changes in v6: None Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h b/include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..db5e810 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_DOMAIN_RK3288_H__ +#define __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_DOMAIN_RK3288_H__ + +/** + * RK3288 Power Domain and Voltage Domain Summary. + */ + +/* VD_CORE */ +#define RK3288_PD_A17_0 0 +#define RK3288_PD_A17_1 1 +#define RK3288_PD_A17_2 2 +#define RK3288_PD_A17_3 3 +#define RK3288_PD_SCU 4 +#define RK3288_PD_DEBUG 5 +#define RK3288_PD_MEM 6 + +/* VD_LOGIC */ +#define RK3288_PD_BUS 7 +#define RK3288_PD_PERI 8 +#define RK3288_PD_VIO 9 +#define RK3288_PD_ALIVE 10 +#define RK3288_PD_HEVC 11 +#define RK3288_PD_VIDEO 12 + +/* VD_GPU */ +#define RK3288_PD_GPU 13 + +/* VD_PMU */ +#define RK3288_PD_PMU 14 + +#endif -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1gZR-8hW-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1212752 |
We can add more domains node in the future.
This patch add the needed clocks into power-controller.
As the discuess about all the device clocks being listed in
the power-domains itself.
There are several reasons as follows:
Firstly, the clocks need be turned off to save power when
the system enter the suspend state. So we need to enumerate
the clocks in the dts. In order to power domain can turn on and off.
Secondly, the reset-circuit should reset be synchronous on RK3288,
then sync revoked. So we need to enable clocks of all devices.
In other words, we have to enable the clocks before you operate them
if all the device clocks are included in someone domians.
Someone wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the
device nodes, We can do that but we can solve the above issues.
Anyway, the best ideas we can fix it in the future SoCs.
Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
---
Changes in v16:
- Manually copy the problem in patch v15.
- rebase the description.
Changes in v15:
- As Tomasz remarked previously the dts should represent the hardware
and the power-domains are part of the pmu.
Changes in v14:
- Remove essential clocks from rk3288 PD_VIO domain, Some clocks are
essential for the system health and should not be turned down.
However there is no owner for them so if they listed as belonging to power
domain we'll try toggling them up and down during power domain transition.
As a result we either fail to suspend or resume the system.
Changes in v13: None
Changes in v12: None
Changes in v11: None
Changes in v10:
- fix missing the #include <dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h>.
- remove the notes.
Changes in v9:
- add decription for power-doamin node.
Changes in v8:
- DTS go back to v2.
Changes in v7: None
Changes in v6: None
Changes in v5: None
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3:
- Decomposition power-controller, changed to multiple controller
(gpu-power-controller, hevc-power-controller).
Changes in v2:
- make pd_vio clocks all one entry per line and alphabetize.
- power: power-controller move back to pinctrl: pinctrl.
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
index 22316d0..161931d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h>
#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h>
#include "skeleton.dtsi"
/ {
@@ -590,8 +591,65 @@
};
pmu: power-management@ff730000 {
- compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-pmu", "syscon";
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-pmu", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
reg = <0xff730000 0x100>;
+
+ power: power-controller {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller";
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ pd_gpu {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_GPU>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
+ };
+
+ pd_hevc {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_HEVC>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_HEVC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CABAC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CORE>,
+ <&cru HCLK_HEVC>;
+ };
+
+ pd_vio {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_VIO>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_RGA>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VIP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru DCLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru DCLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru HCLK_IEP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_RGA>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VIP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru PCLK_EDP_CTRL>,
+ <&cru PCLK_HDMI_CTRL>,
+ <&cru PCLK_LVDS_PHY>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_CSI>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI0>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI1>,
+ <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>,
+ <&cru SCLK_EDP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HDMI_CEC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HDMI_HDCP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_ISP_JPE>,
+ <&cru SCLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_RGA>;
+ };
+
+ pd_video {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_VIDEO>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>;
+ };
+ };
};
sgrf: syscon@ff740000 {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 23:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1tDJ-1uW-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1212761 |
Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> writes: > We can add more domains node in the future. > This patch add the needed clocks into power-controller. > As the discuess about all the device clocks being listed in > the power-domains itself. > > There are several reasons as follows: > > Firstly, the clocks need be turned off to save power when > the system enter the suspend state. So we need to enumerate > the clocks in the dts. In order to power domain can turn on and off. Yes, but this is the job of device drivers which are runtime PM adapted to gate their own clocks. I agree these clocks need to be enumerated in the DTS, but they should be in the device nodes. > Secondly, the reset-circuit should reset be synchronous on RK3288, > then sync revoked. So we need to enable clocks of all devices. > In other words, we have to enable the clocks before you operate them > if all the device clocks are included in someone domians. Yes, this is pretty common for reset. > Someone wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the > device nodes, We can do that but we can solve the above issues. I don't follow this sentence. Are you saying doing that will not solve the above issues? Why not? Please explain. If there are non-device clocks that also need to be enabled before asserting reset, then those are candidates for the power-domain node, but not device clocks. > Anyway, the best ideas we can fix it in the future SoCs. I don't think this is an SoC design issue as this is needed when you have synchronous reset. My concern is primarily around how to describe this in the DT. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 23:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1ugr-2el-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213358 |
Kevin, On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: > Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> writes: > >> We can add more domains node in the future. >> This patch add the needed clocks into power-controller. >> As the discuess about all the device clocks being listed in >> the power-domains itself. >> >> There are several reasons as follows: >> >> Firstly, the clocks need be turned off to save power when >> the system enter the suspend state. So we need to enumerate >> the clocks in the dts. In order to power domain can turn on and off. > > Yes, but this is the job of device drivers which are runtime PM adapted > to gate their own clocks. I agree these clocks need to be enumerated in > the DTS, but they should be in the device nodes. I _think_ what Caesar means is that the alternative to this patch is to leave the clocks on all the time as they were during the early days of Rockchip (AKA last year). If the clocks are on all the time then the power domain patches can work fine. However, once you start letting clocks turn off then you need to make sure that the power domain code turns the back on temporarily. >> Secondly, the reset-circuit should reset be synchronous on RK3288, >> then sync revoked. So we need to enable clocks of all devices. >> In other words, we have to enable the clocks before you operate them >> if all the device clocks are included in someone domians. > > Yes, this is pretty common for reset. > >> Someone wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the >> device nodes, We can do that but we can solve the above issues. > > I don't follow this sentence. Are you saying doing that will not solve > the above issues? Why not? Please explain. > > If there are non-device clocks that also need to be enabled before > asserting reset, then those are candidates for the power-domain node, > but not device clocks. It's been a long time and I don't know that I've reviewed every revision of this series, but I think there was a proposal that we shouldn't list clocks here. Instead we should search through and find all devices that refer to this power domain, reach in and find their clocks, and turn them on. Did I get that right? To put things in a concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? The above doesn't seem like a terribly great idea to me for a number of reasons, including: 1. If I remember correctly, it's important to turn on clocks for devices even if they're not something you're using / have a driver for. If you don't then the device won't get reset properly and this can affect things like suspend/resume because the hardware in the SoC will query all devices at suspend time to make sure they're ready. If a device is wedged because its clock wasn't on at the right them then it will cause problems. 2. If we absolutely need to turn all clocks and we get clocks from device tree nodes on then it means we need device tree nodes for every device in the domain. These would be needed even if there are no accepted bindings for this device yet. So we'd need to do one of: A) Block power domain patches on feature complete bindings for all drivers; B) Make up non-approved compatible strings for all devices and throw them into the DTS; C) Add nodes in the DTS without a compatible string just to satisfy the power domain requirements. None of these seem terribly appealing. 3. It is entirely possible that there are clocks that will be listed in the individual devices that aren't needed for powering on the power domain. I'd tend to believe that PCLK_EDP_CTRL (the pixel clock) doesn't really need to be turned on when adjusting the "VIO" power domain. Right now Caesar has it listed, but it probably isn't needed (Caesar: can you confirm?). 4. It seems just slightly brittle to be reaching into other device nodes and making assumptions about their properties. Yeah, it's probably safe to assume that "clocks" has a list of clocks and "power-domains" will point to something whose first entry is a phandle, but it still seems just a tad bit like violating an abstraction barrier. Anyway, perhaps I'm misunderstanding, or perhaps my concerns are simply not for important things. If so feel free to yell at me. ;) >> Anyway, the best ideas we can fix it in the future SoCs. > > I don't think this is an SoC design issue as this is needed when you > have synchronous reset. My concern is primarily around how to describe > this in the DT. I suppose the SoC could override things and make sure clocks are on in this case? ...or if a clock is off it could defer powering it up somehow until the clock came on? ...dunno how this actually looks in hardware. In any case letting devices get wedged doesn't seem ideal... -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 00:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1vct-3QR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213383 |
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes: > Kevin, > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> writes: >> >>> We can add more domains node in the future. >>> This patch add the needed clocks into power-controller. >>> As the discuess about all the device clocks being listed in >>> the power-domains itself. >>> >>> There are several reasons as follows: >>> >>> Firstly, the clocks need be turned off to save power when >>> the system enter the suspend state. So we need to enumerate >>> the clocks in the dts. In order to power domain can turn on and off. >> >> Yes, but this is the job of device drivers which are runtime PM adapted >> to gate their own clocks. I agree these clocks need to be enumerated in >> the DTS, but they should be in the device nodes. > > I _think_ what Caesar means is that the alternative to this patch is > to leave the clocks on all the time as they were during the early days > of Rockchip (AKA last year). If the clocks are on all the time then > the power domain patches can work fine. However, once you start > letting clocks turn off then you need to make sure that the power > domain code turns the back on temporarily. Yup, I understand that part, and many SoCs have this same "feature". >>> Secondly, the reset-circuit should reset be synchronous on RK3288, >>> then sync revoked. So we need to enable clocks of all devices. >>> In other words, we have to enable the clocks before you operate them >>> if all the device clocks are included in someone domians. >> >> Yes, this is pretty common for reset. >> >>> Someone wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the >>> device nodes, We can do that but we can solve the above issues. >> >> I don't follow this sentence. Are you saying doing that will not solve >> the above issues? Why not? Please explain. >> >> If there are non-device clocks that also need to be enabled before >> asserting reset, then those are candidates for the power-domain node, >> but not device clocks. > > It's been a long time and I don't know that I've reviewed every > revision of this series, but I think there was a proposal that we > shouldn't list clocks here. Instead we should search through and find > all devices that refer to this power domain, reach in and find their > clocks, and turn them on. Did I get that right? Yes... > To put things in a > concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree > ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = > <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those > properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate > over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? ... but you make it sound like more work than it is. The genpd already keeps a list of devices that refer to the power domain. In fact, the genpd 'attach' method can be platform-specific, so could be used to keep track of a list (or a subset) of clocks which are needed for reset. > The above doesn't seem like a terribly great idea to me for a number > of reasons, including: > > 1. If I remember correctly, it's important to turn on clocks for > devices even if they're not something you're using / have a driver > for. If you don't then the device won't get reset properly and this > can affect things like suspend/resume because the hardware in the SoC > will query all devices at suspend time to make sure they're ready. Correct. This condition also exists in the clock framework when unused clocks are disabled, or if you have drivers but PM_RUNTIME is disabled (which can happen from userspace on a per-device basis) so it needs to be understood and managed already. > If > a device is wedged because its clock wasn't on at the right them then > it will cause problems. Right. I'm not arguing that the power domain doesn't have to deal with device clocks. It has to for sync reset. The objection I have have is where these clocks are described. > 2. If we absolutely need to turn all clocks and we get clocks from > device tree nodes on then it means we need device tree nodes for every > device in the domain. Isn't that the end goal? > These would be needed even if there are no > accepted bindings for this device yet. So we'd need to do one of: A) > Block power domain patches on feature complete bindings for all > drivers; B) Make up non-approved compatible strings for all devices > and throw them into the DTS; C) Add nodes in the DTS without a > compatible string just to satisfy the power domain requirements. None > of these seem terribly appealing. well, I think we can be slightly more accomodating than that and go for somewhere in between: D) In the power-domain DTS, clearly describe why each clock is needed by the power-domain. In particular list out clocks that are not device clocks (and why they need to be asserted for reset) and separate those from device clocks which are only listed in the power-domain because there is not *yet* a driver/binding for that device node. Doing it that way also makes it clear that when a new driver/binding is added, the clocks should be removed from the power-domain node and put into the device node. Also, this addresses my primary concern that the DTS acurately describes the hardware. IOW, in hardware, most of these clocks are are properties of devices, not power-domains, and the DT should reflect that. IMO, if it's not describing the hardware, and is a placeholder until a driver/binding is in place, it should be properly documented. > 3. It is entirely possible that there are clocks that will be listed > in the individual devices that aren't needed for powering on the power > domain. I'd tend to believe that PCLK_EDP_CTRL (the pixel clock) > doesn't really need to be turned on when adjusting the "VIO" power > domain. Right now Caesar has it listed, but it probably isn't needed > (Caesar: can you confirm?). Yes, I suspect there are several of those, which is also why I'd like to see the clocks in the power-domain node described in detail, and exacly why they're needed to be enabled. Also, in the current proposed DTS, clocks that are listed in both device nodes and the power domain are also suspicous, especially when the device node doesn't have a power-domain property. (c.f. vop[bl] nodes and ACLK_VOP[01] clocks.) For that matter, this series doesn't add any devices to the power domains, which makes it even more confusing about how this is meant to work. IOW, with no devices belonging to power-domains, how are the power-domain power_on/power_off callbacks being called? > 4. It seems just slightly brittle to be reaching into other device > nodes and making assumptions about their properties. Yeah, it's > probably safe to assume that "clocks" has a list of clocks and > "power-domains" will point to something whose first entry is a > phandle, but it still seems just a tad bit like violating an > abstraction barrier. shmobile is already doing this with platform-specific genpd attach callbacks, and using the pm_clk API. I don't see any issues with that. > Anyway, perhaps I'm misunderstanding, or perhaps my concerns are > simply not for important things. If so feel free to yell at me. ;) No need for me to yell. Your concerns are perfectly valid, and it's not my style anyways. ;) Thanks for the feedback, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1w8y-5bw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213418 |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: > Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes: > >> To put things in a >> concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree >> ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = >> <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those >> properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate >> over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? > > ... but you make it sound like more work than it is. The genpd already > keeps a list of devices that refer to the power domain. In fact, the > genpd 'attach' method can be platform-specific, so could be used to keep > track of a list (or a subset) of clocks which are needed for reset. That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will miss the clocks for it. And the quirk of this SoC is that we need to turn all clocks during domain transition, regardless of whether there is a driver for all devices. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 02:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2fIm-3FN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213441 |
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes: >> >>> To put things in a >>> concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree >>> ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = >>> <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those >>> properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate >>> over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? >> >> ... but you make it sound like more work than it is. The genpd already >> keeps a list of devices that refer to the power domain. In fact, the >> genpd 'attach' method can be platform-specific, so could be used to keep >> track of a list (or a subset) of clocks which are needed for reset. > > That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in > probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will > miss the clocks for it. And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in a way that actually describes the hardware. > And the quirk of this SoC is that we need to > turn all clocks during domain transition, regardless of whether there > is a driver for all devices. I understand. And that "quirk" is not unique to rockchip socs. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2hh7-645-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1215019 |
Kevin, On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in >> probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will >> miss the clocks for it. > > And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are > good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be > called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a > driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in > a way that actually describes the hardware. What happens if someone disables the driver using the CONFIG subsystem? What happens if this is a device that someone has set to 'status = "disabled";' in the device tree? Even if the device is disabled in one of those two ways, we still need the clocks to be turned on. ...so if we turn on/off the VIO domain we need to turn on the EDP clock even if there's no EDP in the current board / config. We might turn on/off VIO for one of the other devices in the VIO domain for one of the other devices in VIO that we are using. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2y8h-598-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1215058 |
Hi Doug, Quoting Doug Anderson (2015-08-27 19:03:20) > Kevin, > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: > >> That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in > >> probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will > >> miss the clocks for it. > > > > And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are > > good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be > > called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a > > driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in > > a way that actually describes the hardware. > > What happens if someone disables the driver using the CONFIG subsystem? Kevin asked me to chime in on this thread, as I have a half-baked idea that might solve the problem posed by your question above. One thing I have been considering for a while is a fallback compatible string that can be used for an IP block when either there is no driver loaded or no driver exists at all. Something like "generic-ip-block". The purpose of this compatible string is to allow us to model resource consumption in dts accurately, regardless of whether or not a proper driver has been written in Linux. This idea was born out of the simple-fb binding/driver discussion last year[0]. Obviously such a binding would not enable any of the logic or function of that IP block; that would require a proper driver. But it would allow us to properly link system-wide resources that are consumed: the generic-ip could consume clocks and regulators, it could belong to power domains, etc. For this reason I have also thought that "generic-resource-consumer" is an accurate compatible string. This spares us from having to encode nasty details into the power domain binding, which is exactly what would happen if you needed a dedicated list of clocks in the power domain node that were not claimed by device nodes/drivers. Note that a real driver might exist for an IP block, but if that driver is disabled in Kconfig AND the corresponding dt node has this fallback compatible string, then we could be OK, from the perspective of the power domain problem. > > What happens if this is a device that someone has set to 'status = > "disabled";' in the device tree? If someone does that, then I think we should let that break power domain transitions. > > Even if the device is disabled in one of those two ways, we still need > the clocks to be turned on. ...so if we turn on/off the VIO domain we > need to turn on the EDP clock even if there's no EDP in the current > board / config. We might turn on/off VIO for one of the other devices > in the VIO domain for one of the other devices in VIO that we are > using. I'm hesitant to mention this but I am working on a patch series to implement a clock "handoff" mechanism (also inspired by the simplefb discussion). This allows us to set a per-clock flag that tells the framework to enable that clock at registration time, and then the first clock consumer driver to come along and claim that clock inherits that clock enable reference count. I'm working on v2 that lets us set this flag from DT, but I really only plan to do this for special cases. For the normal case the flag should be set in the Linux clock provider driver. In the mean time v1 is under discussion[1]. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1407914239-12054-5-git-send-email-libv@skynet.be> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1438974570-20812-1-git-send-email-mturquette@baylibre.com> Regards, Mike > > -Doug > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2z4m-6rs-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1215540 |
Mike, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Quoting Doug Anderson (2015-08-27 19:03:20) >> Kevin, >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in >> >> probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will >> >> miss the clocks for it. >> > >> > And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are >> > good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be >> > called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a >> > driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in >> > a way that actually describes the hardware. >> >> What happens if someone disables the driver using the CONFIG subsystem? > > Kevin asked me to chime in on this thread, as I have a half-baked idea > that might solve the problem posed by your question above. > > One thing I have been considering for a while is a fallback compatible > string that can be used for an IP block when either there is no driver > loaded or no driver exists at all. Something like "generic-ip-block". > > The purpose of this compatible string is to allow us to model resource > consumption in dts accurately, regardless of whether or not a proper > driver has been written in Linux. This idea was born out of the > simple-fb binding/driver discussion last year[0]. > > Obviously such a binding would not enable any of the logic or function > of that IP block; that would require a proper driver. But it would allow > us to properly link system-wide resources that are consumed: the > generic-ip could consume clocks and regulators, it could belong to power > domains, etc. For this reason I have also thought that > "generic-resource-consumer" is an accurate compatible string. > > This spares us from having to encode nasty details into the power domain > binding, which is exactly what would happen if you needed a dedicated > list of clocks in the power domain node that were not claimed by device > nodes/drivers. > > Note that a real driver might exist for an IP block, but if that driver > is disabled in Kconfig AND the corresponding dt node has this fallback > compatible string, then we could be OK, from the perspective of the > power domain problem. OK, so that could solve the "Kconfig" problem. >> What happens if this is a device that someone has set to 'status = >> "disabled";' in the device tree? > > If someone does that, then I think we should let that break power domain > transitions. So if you're on a board that doesn't use EDP but uses LVDS then their suspend/resume should be broken? Specifically, it's my understanding that on this SoC: 1. There's a single "video IO" power domain that contains things like the video output processor, EDP, LVDS, HDMI, etc. 2. When you turn on/off the power domain it's important to clock all devices in the domain during the reset. 3. If you don't clock all devices during the reset they get left in a "wedged" state. 4. If you try to do things like suspend/resume it will query all devices. If they've been left in the wedged state then suspend/resume will be blocked. ...so this problem is still not solved. >> Even if the device is disabled in one of those two ways, we still need >> the clocks to be turned on. ...so if we turn on/off the VIO domain we >> need to turn on the EDP clock even if there's no EDP in the current >> board / config. We might turn on/off VIO for one of the other devices >> in the VIO domain for one of the other devices in VIO that we are >> using. > > I'm hesitant to mention this but I am working on a patch series to > implement a clock "handoff" mechanism (also inspired by the simplefb > discussion). This allows us to set a per-clock flag that tells the > framework to enable that clock at registration time, and then the first > clock consumer driver to come along and claim that clock inherits that > clock enable reference count. > > I'm working on v2 that lets us set this flag from DT, but I really only > plan to do this for special cases. For the normal case the flag should > be set in the Linux clock provider driver. In the mean time v1 is under > discussion[1]. In this case if we're using LVDS and HDMI on a system, we don't want the EDP clock always on (that just wastes power). We just need to clock it for the power domain transition. Note that nothing in the above solves the problem that not all clocks for a given device need to be turned on during power domain transitions. If we're trying to describe hardware perfectly, we'd really need to add to each device: clocks = <clk1>, <clk2>, <clk3>, ... clock-names = "name1", "name2", "name3", ... clocks-for-power-domain-transition = "name2", "name3"; ...since perhaps the clock named "name1" isn't required for power domain transitions and so shouldn't be turned on. Note that once we're going through and adding a special list, it doesn't seem that different than just adding the list in the power domain node instead (other than being more complex). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 01:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2AMO-fd-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1215564 |
Quoting Doug Anderson (2015-08-28 14:08:52) > Mike, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Michael Turquette > <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > Quoting Doug Anderson (2015-08-27 19:03:20) > >> Kevin, > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: > >> >> That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in > >> >> probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will > >> >> miss the clocks for it. > >> > > >> > And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are > >> > good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be > >> > called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a > >> > driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in > >> > a way that actually describes the hardware. > >> > >> What happens if someone disables the driver using the CONFIG subsystem? > > > > Kevin asked me to chime in on this thread, as I have a half-baked idea > > that might solve the problem posed by your question above. > > > > One thing I have been considering for a while is a fallback compatible > > string that can be used for an IP block when either there is no driver > > loaded or no driver exists at all. Something like "generic-ip-block". > > > > The purpose of this compatible string is to allow us to model resource > > consumption in dts accurately, regardless of whether or not a proper > > driver has been written in Linux. This idea was born out of the > > simple-fb binding/driver discussion last year[0]. > > > > Obviously such a binding would not enable any of the logic or function > > of that IP block; that would require a proper driver. But it would allow > > us to properly link system-wide resources that are consumed: the > > generic-ip could consume clocks and regulators, it could belong to power > > domains, etc. For this reason I have also thought that > > "generic-resource-consumer" is an accurate compatible string. > > > > This spares us from having to encode nasty details into the power domain > > binding, which is exactly what would happen if you needed a dedicated > > list of clocks in the power domain node that were not claimed by device > > nodes/drivers. > > > > Note that a real driver might exist for an IP block, but if that driver > > is disabled in Kconfig AND the corresponding dt node has this fallback > > compatible string, then we could be OK, from the perspective of the > > power domain problem. > > OK, so that could solve the "Kconfig" problem. > > > >> What happens if this is a device that someone has set to 'status = > >> "disabled";' in the device tree? > > > > If someone does that, then I think we should let that break power domain > > transitions. > > So if you're on a board that doesn't use EDP but uses LVDS then their > suspend/resume should be broken? > > Specifically, it's my understanding that on this SoC: > > 1. There's a single "video IO" power domain that contains things like > the video output processor, EDP, LVDS, HDMI, etc. > > 2. When you turn on/off the power domain it's important to clock all > devices in the domain during the reset. > > 3. If you don't clock all devices during the reset they get left in a > "wedged" state. > > 4. If you try to do things like suspend/resume it will query all > devices. If they've been left in the wedged state then suspend/resume > will be blocked. > > ...so this problem is still not solved. I talked to Kevin about this and we both agree that the power domain's use of the clock consumer binding is totally valid. So I still think there might be a use for the generic-ip binding, but I also think the solution in this original patch also looks sane. A paraphrase of my discussion with Kevin is that we can think of both the device (EDP, LVDS) and the power domain as clock consumers, so basically there is nothing weird going on here. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> I do also agree with Kevin that we have a lot of layering issues to consider here with description of PM hardware, and there are temptations to take the shortest route to get things working. Truly modeling relationships is the best way forward and we need to keep that in mind over the long haul. > > >> Even if the device is disabled in one of those two ways, we still need > >> the clocks to be turned on. ...so if we turn on/off the VIO domain we > >> need to turn on the EDP clock even if there's no EDP in the current > >> board / config. We might turn on/off VIO for one of the other devices > >> in the VIO domain for one of the other devices in VIO that we are > >> using. > > > > I'm hesitant to mention this but I am working on a patch series to > > implement a clock "handoff" mechanism (also inspired by the simplefb > > discussion). This allows us to set a per-clock flag that tells the > > framework to enable that clock at registration time, and then the first > > clock consumer driver to come along and claim that clock inherits that > > clock enable reference count. > > > > I'm working on v2 that lets us set this flag from DT, but I really only > > plan to do this for special cases. For the normal case the flag should > > be set in the Linux clock provider driver. In the mean time v1 is under > > discussion[1]. > > In this case if we're using LVDS and HDMI on a system, we don't want > the EDP clock always on (that just wastes power). We just need to > clock it for the power domain transition. > > > Note that nothing in the above solves the problem that not all clocks > for a given device need to be turned on during power domain > transitions. If we're trying to describe hardware perfectly, we'd > really need to add to each device: > > clocks = <clk1>, <clk2>, <clk3>, ... > clock-names = "name1", "name2", "name3", ... > clocks-for-power-domain-transition = "name2", "name3"; > > ...since perhaps the clock named "name1" isn't required for power > domain transitions and so shouldn't be turned on. Note that once > we're going through and adding a special list, it doesn't seem that > different than just adding the list in the power domain node instead > (other than being more complex). Yes, this is a broader issue with mapping clocks onto consumer use cases. The same is exactly true for any consumer driver that consumes multiple clocks and enables/disables them differently (e.g. interface clocks versus functional clocks). How to convey that in DT? Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q2znI-6NW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1215540 |
Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> writes: > Hi Doug, > > Quoting Doug Anderson (2015-08-27 19:03:20) >> Kevin, >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> That is not really workable: the attach and detach happen in >> >> probe/remove path; if you do not have driver for the device you will >> >> miss the clocks for it. >> > >> > And in my proposal, I suggested that clocks without drivers are >> > good candidates to list in the domain, with the caveat that the be >> > called out (documented) as being device clocks that are missing a >> > driver, so when a driver shows up they can be moved accordingly, and in >> > a way that actually describes the hardware. >> >> What happens if someone disables the driver using the CONFIG subsystem? > > Kevin asked me to chime in on this thread, as I have a half-baked idea > that might solve the problem posed by your question above. > > One thing I have been considering for a while is a fallback compatible > string that can be used for an IP block when either there is no driver > loaded or no driver exists at all. Something like "generic-ip-block". > > The purpose of this compatible string is to allow us to model resource > consumption in dts accurately, regardless of whether or not a proper > driver has been written in Linux. This idea was born out of the > simple-fb binding/driver discussion last year[0]. > > Obviously such a binding would not enable any of the logic or function > of that IP block; that would require a proper driver. But it would allow > us to properly link system-wide resources that are consumed: the > generic-ip could consume clocks and regulators, it could belong to power > domains, etc. For this reason I have also thought that > "generic-resource-consumer" is an accurate compatible string. > > This spares us from having to encode nasty details into the power domain > binding, which is exactly what would happen if you needed a dedicated > list of clocks in the power domain node that were not claimed by device > nodes/drivers. > > Note that a real driver might exist for an IP block, but if that driver > is disabled in Kconfig AND the corresponding dt node has this fallback > compatible string, then we could be OK, from the perspective of the > power domain problem. > >> >> What happens if this is a device that someone has set to 'status = >> "disabled";' in the device tree? > > If someone does that, then I think we should let that break power domain > transitions. > Well, the catch here is that status=disabled doesn't necessarily mean that the IP block isn't present. It can mean "not used", "not needed", "not wired up to external iface" etc., but if the IP block is physcially present, then its clocks are still needed for a power domain reset. If a node is marked as status=disabled, then even the fallback compatible doesn't help, as the fallback driver won't be probed/loaded either. :( Speaking of loading, the module loading/unloading complicates this even further. Even if a pm-domain is managing the clocks from a device node, if a driver is unloaded (and thus removed from the pm domain), the pm domain driver would stop managing that clock and then the domain reset would stop working again. Ugh. The more I think through all these corner cases, and also the fact that we never seem to be able to get a fully accurate description of how the SoCs actually work at this level (due to missing/poor/wrong docs), I think the having both the power domain and the device nodes claiming clocks is the most flexible solution. It's using the clock consumer binding in a perfectly acceptable way, and the clock fwk usecounting will manage usecounting etc. However, I still stick by my earlier insistence that the DT nodes be thorougly documented though, and be very specific why the clocks are needed by the power domain, and especially which clocks are device clocks, etc. I (and hopefully others) will be looking closely at the DTs that come through and make that clocks listed in the domains are well described. @Doug: thanks for taking the time to spell out the variou corner cases. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 02:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1wie-5mJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213418 |
Kevin, On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >> To put things in a >> concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree >> ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = >> <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those >> properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate >> over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? > > ... but you make it sound like more work than it is. The genpd already > keeps a list of devices that refer to the power domain. In fact, the > genpd 'attach' method can be platform-specific, so could be used to keep > track of a list (or a subset) of clocks which are needed for reset. OK. I'll need to dig through and figure out how this works. So this list will include devices whose drivers are compiled out and also devices that are marked as 'status = "disabled";' in the device tree? It would need to do this in case someone had a board that didn't use one of these peripherals (since we still need to clock it as we make the domain go up and down). I took a quick gander and didn't see code that would do this. Can you give me a quick pointer? We also need to really make sure that there are no probe order issues... >> 2. If we absolutely need to turn all clocks and we get clocks from >> device tree nodes on then it means we need device tree nodes for every >> device in the domain. > > Isn't that the end goal? In the ideal world, yes. ...but it's possibly years before all drivers are added, or possibly they never will be. To name a concrete example, unless I'm mistaken, the "hardware crypto" device present in exynos5250 still isn't anywhere in upstream despite several years having passed. There are just so many devices in these SoCs that aren't used. >> These would be needed even if there are no >> accepted bindings for this device yet. So we'd need to do one of: A) >> Block power domain patches on feature complete bindings for all >> drivers; B) Make up non-approved compatible strings for all devices >> and throw them into the DTS; C) Add nodes in the DTS without a >> compatible string just to satisfy the power domain requirements. None >> of these seem terribly appealing. > > well, I think we can be slightly more accomodating than that and go for > somewhere in between: > > D) In the power-domain DTS, clearly describe why each clock is needed by > the power-domain. In particular list out clocks that are not device > clocks (and why they need to be asserted for reset) and separate those > from device clocks which are only listed in the power-domain because > there is not *yet* a driver/binding for that device node. > > Doing it that way also makes it clear that when a new driver/binding is > added, the clocks should be removed from the power-domain node and put > into the device node. > > Also, this addresses my primary concern that the DTS acurately describes > the hardware. IOW, in hardware, most of these clocks are are properties > of devices, not power-domains, and the DT should reflect that. > > IMO, if it's not describing the hardware, and is a placeholder until a > driver/binding is in place, it should be properly documented. Agreed that more documentation about why each clock is needed would go a long way to helping. I'd say that the clocks are properties of the device, but I'd again assert that not all clocks that are owned by the device are relevant to turning power domains on and off. If you really wanted to be correct, you'd add a property like this to devices: power-on-clocks = <..>; ...this would be a list of clocks needed to power on the device properly. If such a property was added that would erase my objection to that. Note that you could say that if "power-on-clocks" wasn't present then you could fall back to "clocks". I do worry a little bit about over-engineering, so I guess this could just be a future improvement... >> 3. It is entirely possible that there are clocks that will be listed >> in the individual devices that aren't needed for powering on the power >> domain. I'd tend to believe that PCLK_EDP_CTRL (the pixel clock) >> doesn't really need to be turned on when adjusting the "VIO" power >> domain. Right now Caesar has it listed, but it probably isn't needed >> (Caesar: can you confirm?). > > Yes, I suspect there are several of those, which is also why I'd like to > see the clocks in the power-domain node described in detail, and exacly > why they're needed to be enabled. I guess my point was that this was a reason for doing something like "power-on-clocks" because it would let you avoid turning on PCLK_EDP_CTRL (which is listed in the "clocks" of the EDP device but maybe not needed while powering on/off the domain). ...or just have the list as part of the power domain. :-P > Also, in the current proposed DTS, clocks that are listed in both device > nodes and the power domain are also suspicous, especially when the > device node doesn't have a power-domain property. (c.f. vop[bl] nodes > and ACLK_VOP[01] clocks.) For that matter, this series doesn't add any > devices to the power domains, which makes it even more confusing about > how this is meant to work. IOW, with no devices belonging to > power-domains, how are the power-domain power_on/power_off callbacks > being called? I totally believe that our current hardware definition isn't so correct (though it does seem to work). I'd be that devices that never turn off often don't have a power domain defined (though they technically have one) because that power domain always happens to be on and no amount of specifying will allow it to turn off. An advantage of what you're pushing for is that it really forces us to think about exactly what clocks are needed and forces us to specify power domains more correctly. >> 4. It seems just slightly brittle to be reaching into other device >> nodes and making assumptions about their properties. Yeah, it's >> probably safe to assume that "clocks" has a list of clocks and >> "power-domains" will point to something whose first entry is a >> phandle, but it still seems just a tad bit like violating an >> abstraction barrier. > > shmobile is already doing this with platform-specific genpd attach > callbacks, and using the pm_clk API. I don't see any issues with that. I can see it working. It's more of a feeling of unease. ...but that's not a good enough reason to reject something... -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 4/4] ARM: dts: add the support power-domain node on RK3288 SoCs |
| Message-ID | <q1FbQ-1C1-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213418 |
在 2015年08月26日 06:45, Kevin Hilman 写道: > Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes: > >> Kevin, >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote: >>> Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> writes: >>> >>>> We can add more domains node in the future. >>>> This patch add the needed clocks into power-controller. >>>> As the discuess about all the device clocks being listed in >>>> the power-domains itself. >>>> >>>> There are several reasons as follows: >>>> >>>> Firstly, the clocks need be turned off to save power when >>>> the system enter the suspend state. So we need to enumerate >>>> the clocks in the dts. In order to power domain can turn on and off. >>> Yes, but this is the job of device drivers which are runtime PM adapted >>> to gate their own clocks. I agree these clocks need to be enumerated in >>> the DTS, but they should be in the device nodes. >> I _think_ what Caesar means is that the alternative to this patch is >> to leave the clocks on all the time as they were during the early days >> of Rockchip (AKA last year). If the clocks are on all the time then >> the power domain patches can work fine. However, once you start >> letting clocks turn off then you need to make sure that the power >> domain code turns the back on temporarily. > Yup, I understand that part, and many SoCs have this same "feature". > >>>> Secondly, the reset-circuit should reset be synchronous on RK3288, >>>> then sync revoked. So we need to enable clocks of all devices. >>>> In other words, we have to enable the clocks before you operate them >>>> if all the device clocks are included in someone domians. >>> Yes, this is pretty common for reset. >>> >>>> Someone wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the >>>> device nodes, We can do that but we can solve the above issues. >>> I don't follow this sentence. Are you saying doing that will not solve >>> the above issues? Why not? Please explain. >>> >>> If there are non-device clocks that also need to be enabled before >>> asserting reset, then those are candidates for the power-domain node, >>> but not device clocks. >> It's been a long time and I don't know that I've reviewed every >> revision of this series, but I think there was a proposal that we >> shouldn't list clocks here. Instead we should search through and find >> all devices that refer to this power domain, reach in and find their >> clocks, and turn them on. Did I get that right? > Yes... Sounds resonable, the domain(e.g. "pd_vio"...) idle will be abnormal but you have registered all devices. Why? AFAIK, you need turn on the noc/ip clocks if we are operating the "pd_vio" domain to enter the idle status. if the noc is same clock with ip side. We need turn on the IP side clocks. Otherwise we need turn on the noc clocks. >> To put things in a >> concrete way, for pd_vio we'd go through the entire device tree >> ourselves and find all properties that look like "power-domains = >> <&power RK3288_PD_VIO>;". We'd then find the parent of those >> properties and look for a property named "clocks". We'd then iterate >> over all those clocks and turn those on. Did I get that right? > ... but you make it sound like more work than it is. The genpd already > keeps a list of devices that refer to the power domain. In fact, the > genpd 'attach' method can be platform-specific, so could be used to keep > track of a list (or a subset) of clocks which are needed for reset. > >> The above doesn't seem like a terribly great idea to me for a number >> of reasons, including: >> >> 1. If I remember correctly, it's important to turn on clocks for >> devices even if they're not something you're using / have a driver >> for. If you don't then the device won't get reset properly and this >> can affect things like suspend/resume because the hardware in the SoC >> will query all devices at suspend time to make sure they're ready. > Correct. This condition also exists in the clock framework when unused > clocks are disabled, or if you have drivers but PM_RUNTIME is disabled > (which can happen from userspace on a per-device basis) so it needs to > be understood and managed already. > >> If >> a device is wedged because its clock wasn't on at the right them then >> it will cause problems. > Right. I'm not arguing that the power domain doesn't have to deal with > device clocks. It has to for sync reset. The objection I have have is > where these clocks are described. > >> 2. If we absolutely need to turn all clocks and we get clocks from >> device tree nodes on then it means we need device tree nodes for every >> device in the domain. > Isn't that the end goal? > >> These would be needed even if there are no >> accepted bindings for this device yet. So we'd need to do one of: A) >> Block power domain patches on feature complete bindings for all >> drivers; B) Make up non-approved compatible strings for all devices >> and throw them into the DTS; C) Add nodes in the DTS without a >> compatible string just to satisfy the power domain requirements. None >> of these seem terribly appealing. > well, I think we can be slightly more accomodating than that and go for > somewhere in between: > > D) In the power-domain DTS, clearly describe why each clock is needed by > the power-domain. In particular list out clocks that are not device > clocks (and why they need to be asserted for reset) and separate those > from device clocks which are only listed in the power-domain because > there is not *yet* a driver/binding for that device node. > > Doing it that way also makes it clear that when a new driver/binding is > added, the clocks should be removed from the power-domain node and put > into the device node. > > Also, this addresses my primary concern that the DTS acurately describes > the hardware. IOW, in hardware, most of these clocks are are properties > of devices, not power-domains, and the DT should reflect that. > > IMO, if it's not describing the hardware, and is a placeholder until a > driver/binding is in place, it should be properly documented. > >> 3. It is entirely possible that there are clocks that will be listed >> in the individual devices that aren't needed for powering on the power >> domain. I'd tend to believe that PCLK_EDP_CTRL (the pixel clock) >> doesn't really need to be turned on when adjusting the "VIO" power >> domain. Right now Caesar has it listed, but it probably isn't needed >> (Caesar: can you confirm?). > Yes, I suspect there are several of those, which is also why I'd like to > see the clocks in the power-domain node described in detail, and exacly > why they're needed to be enabled. > > Also, in the current proposed DTS, clocks that are listed in both device > nodes and the power domain are also suspicous, especially when the > device node doesn't have a power-domain property. (c.f. vop[bl] nodes > and ACLK_VOP[01] clocks.) For that matter, this series doesn't add any > devices to the power domains, which makes it even more confusing about > how this is meant to work. IOW, with no devices belonging to > power-domains, how are the power-domain power_on/power_off callbacks > being called? Okay, As the cover-letter lists. We can add the EDP/VOP domain node to test in next-kernel. Also, the chromium-3.14 has some devices to complete it. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/v3.14 ---- Thanks, Caesar >> 4. It seems just slightly brittle to be reaching into other device >> nodes and making assumptions about their properties. Yeah, it's >> probably safe to assume that "clocks" has a list of clocks and >> "power-domains" will point to something whose first entry is a >> phandle, but it still seems just a tad bit like violating an >> abstraction barrier. > shmobile is already doing this with platform-specific genpd attach > callbacks, and using the pm_clk API. I don't see any issues with that. > >> Anyway, perhaps I'm misunderstanding, or perhaps my concerns are >> simply not for important things. If so feel free to yell at me. ;) > No need for me to yell. Your concerns are perfectly valid, and it's not > my style anyways. ;) > > Thanks for the feedback, > > Kevin > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web