Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1213013 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool()

Started byUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
First post2015-08-25 14:10 +0200
Last post2015-08-26 00:00 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool() Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-08-25 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool() Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2015-08-25 18:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool() Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-08-25 23:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool() Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2015-08-26 00:00 +0200

#1213013 — Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool()

FromUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date2015-08-25 14:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mmc: host: use of_property_read_bool()
Message-ID<q1ld9-60p-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 7 August 2015 at 00:06, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the of_find_property()
> calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>

Thanks, applied for next!

Next, time please run checkpatch to remove errors/warnings.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> ---
> The patch is against Ulf Hansson's 'mmc.git' repo's 'next' branch.
>
> Changes in version 2:
> - fixed the function name in the summary.
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/host.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmc/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmc.orig/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> +++ mmc/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>  {
>         struct device_node *np;
>         u32 bus_width;
> -       int len, ret;
> +       int ret;
>         bool cd_cap_invert, cd_gpio_invert = false;
>         bool ro_cap_invert, ro_gpio_invert = false;
>
> @@ -445,12 +445,12 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>          */
>
>         /* Parse Card Detection */
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "non-removable", &len)) {
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "non-removable")) {
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
>         } else {
>                 cd_cap_invert = of_property_read_bool(np, "cd-inverted");
>
> -               if (of_find_property(np, "broken-cd", &len))
> +               if (of_property_read_bool(np, "broken-cd"))
>                         host->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
>
>                 ret = mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host, "cd", 0, true,
> @@ -491,41 +491,41 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>         if (ro_cap_invert ^ ro_gpio_invert)
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
>
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "cap-sd-highspeed", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sd-highspeed"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "cap-mmc-highspeed", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-mmc-highspeed"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "sd-uhs-sdr12", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr12"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "sd-uhs-sdr25", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr25"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "sd-uhs-ddr50", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-ddr50"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "cap-power-off-card", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-power-off-card"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "cap-sdio-irq", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sdio-irq"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "full-pwr-cycle", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "full-pwr-cycle"))
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "keep-power-in-suspend", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "keep-power-in-suspend"))
>                 host->pm_caps |= MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "enable-sdio-wakeup", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "enable-sdio-wakeup"))
>                 host->pm_caps |= MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-ddr-1_8v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-ddr-1_8v"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-ddr-1_2v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-ddr-1_2v"))
>                 host->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_2V_DDR;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v"))
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-hs200-1_2v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_2v"))
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-hs400-1_8v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs400-1_8v"))
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_8V | MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR;
> -       if (of_find_property(np, "mmc-hs400-1_2v", &len))
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs400-1_2v"))
>                 host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_HS400_1_2V | MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR;
>
>         host->dsr_req = !of_property_read_u32(np, "dsr", &host->dsr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1213175

FromSergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date2015-08-25 18:40 +0200
Message-ID<q1pqr-3Do-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1213013
On 08/25/2015 03:05 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:

>> Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the of_find_property()
>> calls.

>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>

> Thanks, applied for next!

    Thanks to you! :-)

> Next, time please run checkpatch to remove errors/warnings.

    Hum, I just did and the patch seems clean:

[headless@wasted mmc]$ scripts/checkpatch.pl 
patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked

patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch has no obvious style problems 
and is ready for submission.

    What do you mean?

> Kind regards
> Uffe

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1213365

FromUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date2015-08-25 23:20 +0200
Message-ID<q1tNo-1Gf-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1213175
On 25 August 2015 at 18:32, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 03:05 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>>> Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the
>>> of_find_property()
>>> calls.
>
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>
>
>> Thanks, applied for next!
>
>
>    Thanks to you! :-)
>
>> Next, time please run checkpatch to remove errors/warnings.
>
>
>    Hum, I just did and the patch seems clean:
>
> [headless@wasted mmc]$ scripts/checkpatch.pl
> patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked
>
> patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch has no obvious style
> problems and is ready for submission.
>
>    What do you mean?

WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#12:
Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the of_find_property()

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 81 lines checked

I suspect we might use different versions of the checkpatch script.
Mine is from 4.2rc7.

No worries then!

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1213386

FromSergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Date2015-08-26 00:00 +0200
Message-ID<q1uq5-2tj-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1213365
On 08/26/2015 12:19 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:

>>>> Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the
>>>> of_find_property()
>>>> calls.

>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>
>>> Thanks, applied for next!
>>
>>     Thanks to you! :-)
>>
>>> Next, time please run checkpatch to remove errors/warnings.
>>
>>     Hum, I just did and the patch seems clean:
>>
>> [headless@wasted mmc]$ scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch
>> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked
>>
>> patches/mmc-host-use-of_property_read_bool.patch has no obvious style
>> problems and is ready for submission.
>>
>>     What do you mean?

> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
> chars per line)
> #12:
> Use more compact of_property_read_bool() calls instead of the of_find_property()

> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 81 lines checked

> I suspect we might use different versions of the checkpatch script.
> Mine is from 4.2rc7.

    Tried several variants, the last one was in your repo's 'next' branch 
(4.2-rc7 based). No warning. :-)

> No worries then!

> Kind regards
> Uffe

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web