Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1212093 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 13:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] IGMP: Inhibit reports for local multicast groups Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com> - 2015-08-24 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] IGMP: Inhibit reports for local multicast groups David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-08-25 23:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH] IGMP: Inhibit reports for local multicast groups Philip Downey <pdowney@Brocade.com> - 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200
| From | Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] IGMP: Inhibit reports for local multicast groups |
| Message-ID | <q0Yqe-6D0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The range of addresses between 224.0.0.0 and 224.0.0.255 inclusive, is
reserved for the use of routing protocols and other low-level topology
discovery or maintenance protocols, such as gateway discovery and
group membership reporting. Multicast routers should not forward any
multicast datagram with destination addresses in this range,
regardless of its TTL.
Currently, IGMP reports are generated for this reserved range of
addresses even though a router will ignore this information since it
has no purpose. However, the presence of reserved group addresses in
an IGMP membership report uses up network bandwidth and can also
obscure addresses of interest when inspecting membership reports using
packet inspection or debug messages.
Although the RFCs for the various version of IGMP (e.g.RFC 3376 for
v3) do not specify that the reserved addresses be excluded from
membership reports, it should do no harm in doing so. In particular
there should be no adverse effect in any IGMP snooping functionality
since 224.0.0.x is specifically excluded as per RFC 4541 (IGMP and MLD
Snooping Switches Considerations) section 2.1.2. Data Forwarding
Rules:
2) Packets with a destination IP (DIP) address in the 224.0.0.X
range which are not IGMP must be forwarded on all ports.
IGMP reports for local multicast groups can now be optionally
inhibited by means of a system control variable (by setting the value
to zero) e.g.:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/igmp_link_local_reports
To retain backwards compatibility the previous behaviour is retained
by default on system boot or reverted by setting the value back to
non-zero e.g.:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/igmp_link_local_reports
Signed-off-by: Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com>
---
include/linux/igmp.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/igmp.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/igmp.h b/include/linux/igmp.h
index 193ad48..e3e0dae 100644
--- a/include/linux/igmp.h
+++ b/include/linux/igmp.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static inline struct igmpv3_query *
return (struct igmpv3_query *)skb_transport_header(skb);
}
+extern int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports;
extern int sysctl_igmp_max_memberships;
extern int sysctl_igmp_max_msf;
extern int sysctl_igmp_qrv;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index 9fdfd9d..a3df89d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -110,6 +110,15 @@
#define IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS 20
#define IP_MAX_MSF 10
+/* IGMP reports for link-local multicast groups are enabled by default */
+#define IGMP_ENABLE_LLM 1
+
+int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports __read_mostly = IGMP_ENABLE_LLM;
+
+#define IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(_ipaddr) \
+ (ipv4_is_local_multicast(_ipaddr) && \
+ (sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports == 0))
+
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
/* Parameter names and values are taken from igmp-v2-06 draft */
@@ -437,6 +446,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *add_grec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_mc_list *pmc,
if (pmc->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
return skb;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(pmc->multiaddr))
+ return skb;
isquery = type == IGMPV3_MODE_IS_INCLUDE ||
type == IGMPV3_MODE_IS_EXCLUDE;
@@ -545,6 +556,8 @@ static int igmpv3_send_report(struct in_device *in_dev, struct ip_mc_list *pmc)
for_each_pmc_rcu(in_dev, pmc) {
if (pmc->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
continue;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(pmc->multiaddr))
+ continue;
spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock);
if (pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE])
type = IGMPV3_MODE_IS_EXCLUDE;
@@ -678,7 +691,11 @@ static int igmp_send_report(struct in_device *in_dev, struct ip_mc_list *pmc,
if (type == IGMPV3_HOST_MEMBERSHIP_REPORT)
return igmpv3_send_report(in_dev, pmc);
- else if (type == IGMP_HOST_LEAVE_MESSAGE)
+
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(group))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (type == IGMP_HOST_LEAVE_MESSAGE)
dst = IGMP_ALL_ROUTER;
else
dst = group;
@@ -851,6 +868,8 @@ static bool igmp_heard_report(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 group)
if (group == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
return false;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(group))
+ return false;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_pmc_rcu(in_dev, im) {
@@ -957,6 +976,8 @@ static bool igmp_heard_query(struct in_device *in_dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
continue;
if (im->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
continue;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(im->multiaddr))
+ continue;
spin_lock_bh(&im->lock);
if (im->tm_running)
im->gsquery = im->gsquery && mark;
@@ -1181,6 +1202,8 @@ static void igmp_group_dropped(struct ip_mc_list *im)
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
if (im->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
return;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(im->multiaddr))
+ return;
reporter = im->reporter;
igmp_stop_timer(im);
@@ -1213,6 +1236,8 @@ static void igmp_group_added(struct ip_mc_list *im)
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
if (im->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
return;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(im->multiaddr))
+ return;
if (in_dev->dead)
return;
@@ -1518,6 +1543,8 @@ static void ip_mc_rejoin_groups(struct in_device *in_dev)
for_each_pmc_rtnl(in_dev, im) {
if (im->multiaddr == IGMP_ALL_HOSTS)
continue;
+ if (IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(im->multiaddr))
+ continue;
/* a failover is happening and switches
* must be notified immediately
diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
index 0330ab2..157c25a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
@@ -910,6 +910,13 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
},
+ {
+ .procname = "igmp_link_local_reports",
+ .data = &sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec
+ },
{ }
};
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1tX4-1RJ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1212093 |
From: Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:39:17 +0100 > +extern int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports; ... > +/* IGMP reports for link-local multicast groups are enabled by default */ > +#define IGMP_ENABLE_LLM 1 > + > +int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports __read_mostly = IGMP_ENABLE_LLM; > + > +#define IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(_ipaddr) \ > + (ipv4_is_local_multicast(_ipaddr) && \ > + (sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports == 0)) > + People know that "1" and "0" means enable and disable respectively, so this macros is pretty excessive. Just remove it. Also, simplify the name of the sysctl to something like "sysctl_igmp_llm_reports" or similar, and simplify the test against 0 to be in the canonical "!x" format. Then the test can fit on one line: (ipv4_is_local_multicast(_ipaddr) && !sysctl_igmp_llm_reports) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Philip Downey <pdowney@Brocade.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1FbQ-1C1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1213369 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:20 PM > To: Philip Downey > Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru; jmorris@namei.org; yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org; > kaber@trash.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] IGMP: Inhibit reports for local multicast groups > > From: Philip Downey <pdowney@brocade.com> > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:39:17 +0100 > > > +extern int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports; > ... > > +/* IGMP reports for link-local multicast groups are enabled by default */ > > +#define IGMP_ENABLE_LLM 1 > > + > > +int sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports __read_mostly = IGMP_ENABLE_LLM; > > + > > +#define IGMP_INHIBIT_LINK_LOCAL_REPORTS(_ipaddr) \ > > + (ipv4_is_local_multicast(_ipaddr) && \ > > + (sysctl_igmp_link_local_reports == 0)) > > + > > People know that "1" and "0" means enable and disable respectively, so this > macros is pretty excessive. Just remove it. > > Also, simplify the name of the sysctl to something like > "sysctl_igmp_llm_reports" or similar, and simplify the test against 0 to be in > the canonical "!x" format. Then the test can fit on one > line: > > (ipv4_is_local_multicast(_ipaddr) && !sysctl_igmp_llm_reports). Thanks for reviewing David. I will make the requested changes (fitting the test on a single line was my main reason for introducing the macro - that and making it patently obvious what the test was doing. Your suggestion would seem to meet that aim). Will amend and resubmit. Regards Philip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web