Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1162921 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso test

Started bySteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
First post2015-06-11 00:40 +0200
Last post2015-06-11 00:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso test Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-06-11 00:40 +0200

#1162921 — Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso test

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2015-06-11 00:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso test
Message-ID<pzWP7-3fi-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:15:58 +0200
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/10/2015 10:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> +       printf("[SKIP]\tAT_SYSINFO not supplied, can't test\n");
> >> +       exit(0); /* this is not a test failure */
> > 
> > Why is that not a test failure? It would mean it didn't actually test
> > anything, which seems like a failure to me.
> 
> Are you objecting to comment wording, or to exiting with 0?
> 
> I exit with 0 because no bug was detected.

I believe there's a way to exit with "not supported". That's what the
ftrace tests do.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web