Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1205949 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-12 12:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations  for dirty zone balancing Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-08-20 14:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations  for dirty zone balancing Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-20 15:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations  for dirty zone balancing Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-08-20 16:30 +0200

#1205949 — [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

File-backed pages that will be immediately are balanced between zones but
it's unnecessarily expensive. Move consider_zone_balanced into the alloc_context
instead of checking bitmaps multiple times. The patch also gives the parameter
a more meaningful name.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/internal.h   |  1 +
 mm/page_alloc.c | 11 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 36b23f1e2ca6..9331f802a067 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct alloc_context {
 	int classzone_idx;
 	int migratetype;
 	enum zone_type high_zoneidx;
+	bool spread_dirty_pages;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5e1f6f4370bc..94f2f6bdd6d5 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2297,8 +2297,6 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct page *page = NULL;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	bool consider_zone_dirty = (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_LOW) &&
-				(gfp_mask & __GFP_WRITE);
 	int nr_fair_skipped = 0;
 	bool zonelist_rescan;
 
@@ -2350,14 +2348,14 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 		 *
 		 * XXX: For now, allow allocations to potentially
 		 * exceed the per-zone dirty limit in the slowpath
-		 * (ALLOC_WMARK_LOW unset) before going into reclaim,
+		 * (spread_dirty_pages unset) before going into reclaim,
 		 * which is important when on a NUMA setup the allowed
 		 * zones are together not big enough to reach the
 		 * global limit.  The proper fix for these situations
 		 * will require awareness of zones in the
 		 * dirty-throttling and the flusher threads.
 		 */
-		if (consider_zone_dirty && !zone_dirty_ok(zone))
+		if (ac->spread_dirty_pages && !zone_dirty_ok(zone))
 			continue;
 
 		mark = zone->watermark[alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MASK];
@@ -2997,6 +2995,10 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 
 	/* We set it here, as __alloc_pages_slowpath might have changed it */
 	ac.zonelist = zonelist;
+
+	/* Dirty zone balancing only done in the fast path */
+	ac.spread_dirty_pages = (gfp_mask & __GFP_WRITE);
+
 	/* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */
 	preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac.zonelist, ac.high_zoneidx,
 				ac.nodemask, &ac.preferred_zone);
@@ -3014,6 +3016,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 		 * complete.
 		 */
 		alloc_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask);
+		ac.spread_dirty_pages = false;
 
 		page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(alloc_mask, order, &ac);
 	}
-- 
2.4.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1210478 — Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

On Wed 12-08-15 11:45:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> File-backed pages that will be immediately are balanced between zones but
					    ^written to...

> it's unnecessarily expensive.

to do WHAT? I guess you meant checking gfp_mask resp. alloc_mask? I
doubt it would make a noticeable difference as this is a slow path
already but I agree it doesn't make sense to check it again.

> Move consider_zone_balanced into the alloc_context
> instead of checking bitmaps multiple times. The patch also gives the parameter
> a more meaningful name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
>  mm/internal.h   |  1 +
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 11 +++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 36b23f1e2ca6..9331f802a067 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct alloc_context {
>  	int classzone_idx;
>  	int migratetype;
>  	enum zone_type high_zoneidx;
> +	bool spread_dirty_pages;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5e1f6f4370bc..94f2f6bdd6d5 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2297,8 +2297,6 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
>  	struct zoneref *z;
>  	struct page *page = NULL;
>  	struct zone *zone;
> -	bool consider_zone_dirty = (alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_LOW) &&
> -				(gfp_mask & __GFP_WRITE);
>  	int nr_fair_skipped = 0;
>  	bool zonelist_rescan;
>  
> @@ -2350,14 +2348,14 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
>  		 *
>  		 * XXX: For now, allow allocations to potentially
>  		 * exceed the per-zone dirty limit in the slowpath
> -		 * (ALLOC_WMARK_LOW unset) before going into reclaim,
> +		 * (spread_dirty_pages unset) before going into reclaim,
>  		 * which is important when on a NUMA setup the allowed
>  		 * zones are together not big enough to reach the
>  		 * global limit.  The proper fix for these situations
>  		 * will require awareness of zones in the
>  		 * dirty-throttling and the flusher threads.
>  		 */
> -		if (consider_zone_dirty && !zone_dirty_ok(zone))
> +		if (ac->spread_dirty_pages && !zone_dirty_ok(zone))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		mark = zone->watermark[alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MASK];
> @@ -2997,6 +2995,10 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  
>  	/* We set it here, as __alloc_pages_slowpath might have changed it */
>  	ac.zonelist = zonelist;
> +
> +	/* Dirty zone balancing only done in the fast path */
> +	ac.spread_dirty_pages = (gfp_mask & __GFP_WRITE);
> +
>  	/* The preferred zone is used for statistics later */
>  	preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac.zonelist, ac.high_zoneidx,
>  				ac.nodemask, &ac.preferred_zone);
> @@ -3014,6 +3016,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		 * complete.
>  		 */
>  		alloc_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask);
> +		ac.spread_dirty_pages = false;
>  
>  		page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(alloc_mask, order, &ac);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.4.6
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1210499 — Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-08-15 11:45:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > File-backed pages that will be immediately are balanced between zones but
> 					    ^written to...
> 
> > it's unnecessarily expensive.
> 
> to do WHAT? I guess you meant checking gfp_mask resp. alloc_mask? I
> doubt it would make a noticeable difference as this is a slow path
> already but I agree it doesn't make sense to check it again.
> 

File-backed pages that will be immediately written are balanced between
zones.  This heuristic tries to avoid having a single zone filled with
recently dirtied pages but the checks are unnecessarily expensive. Move
consider_zone_balanced into the alloc_context instead of checking bitmaps
multiple times. The patch also gives the parameter a more meaningful name.

?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1210524 — Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing

On Thu 20-08-15 14:45:26, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 12-08-15 11:45:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > File-backed pages that will be immediately are balanced between zones but
> > 					    ^written to...
> > 
> > > it's unnecessarily expensive.
> > 
> > to do WHAT? I guess you meant checking gfp_mask resp. alloc_mask? I
> > doubt it would make a noticeable difference as this is a slow path
> > already but I agree it doesn't make sense to check it again.
> > 
> 
> File-backed pages that will be immediately written are balanced between
> zones.  This heuristic tries to avoid having a single zone filled with
> recently dirtied pages but the checks are unnecessarily expensive. Move
> consider_zone_balanced into the alloc_context instead of checking bitmaps
> multiple times. The patch also gives the parameter a more meaningful name.

Sounds much better. Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web