Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201780 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 16:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-06 16:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm/slab_common: allow NULL cache pointer in kmem_cache_destroy() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm/slab_common: allow NULL cache pointer in kmem_cache_destroy() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-08-06 16:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm/slab_common: allow NULL cache pointer in kmem_cache_destroy() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:40 +0200
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm/slab_common: allow NULL cache pointer in kmem_cache_destroy() |
| Message-ID | <pUulb-367-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On (06/19/15 08:50), Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > On (06/17/15 16:14), David Rientjes wrote: > > [..] > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 > > > > > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > > > > > kmem_cache_destroy() isn't a fastpath, this is long overdue. Now where's > > > the patch to remove the NULL checks from the callers? ;) > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Yes, Julia Lawall (Cc'd) already has a patch set ready for submission. > > I'll refresh it and send it shortly. > I'll re-up this thread. Julia, do you want to wait until these 3 patches will be merged to Linus's tree (just to be on a safe side, so someone's tree (out of sync with linux-next) will not go crazy)? -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUuld-367-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1201780 |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (06/19/15 08:50), Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > > On (06/17/15 16:14), David Rientjes wrote: > > > [..] > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > > > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 > > > > > > > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > > > > > > > kmem_cache_destroy() isn't a fastpath, this is long overdue. Now where's > > > > the patch to remove the NULL checks from the callers? ;) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Yes, Julia Lawall (Cc'd) already has a patch set ready for submission. > > > > I'll refresh it and send it shortly. > > > > I'll re-up this thread. > > Julia, do you want to wait until these 3 patches will be merged to > Linus's tree (just to be on a safe side, so someone's tree (out of sync > with linux-next) will not go crazy)? I think it would be safer. Code may crash if the test is removed before the function can tolerate it. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUuuS-3ms-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1201799 |
On (08/06/15 16:27), Julia Lawall wrote: [..] > > Julia, do you want to wait until these 3 patches will be merged to > > Linus's tree (just to be on a safe side, so someone's tree (out of sync > > with linux-next) will not go crazy)? > > I think it would be safer. Code may crash if the test is removed before > the function can tolerate it. > Agree. I'll re-up this thread later (once 4.3 merge window is closed). Thank you. -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web