Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1199283 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 00/15] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)

Started bySteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
First post2015-08-03 23:40 +0200
Last post2015-08-04 04:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 00/15] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-08-03 23:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/15] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-04 04:30 +0200

#1199283 — Re: [PATCH 00/15] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2015-08-03 23:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/15] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)
Message-ID<pTvCF-6Zh-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:23:10 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:41:09AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 07/31/2015 10:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >This cleans up the usage of IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)(), where the callers have
> > >added additional unlikely compiler flag to them. It also fixes the
> > >definition of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), to use unlikely for all checks it does.
> > 
> > [+CC Steven Rostedt]
> > 
> > Any idea what the compiler does in the case of
> > "if (likely(IS_ERR(...)))"? There are apparently such cases in the source.
> 
> We have two cases in code:
> 
> drivers/rtc/rtc-gemini.c:       if (likely(IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)))
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c:     if (likely(IS_ERR(shadow) && PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)) {
> 
> The first one is mistake, I think. Or do we expect rtc_device_register()
> to fail?
> 
> The second is redundant. "if (PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)" should do the
> job.
> 

Yep, those look like bugs to me.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1199386

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2015-08-04 04:30 +0200
Message-ID<pTA9j-5jk-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1199283
On 03-08-15, 17:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:23:10 +0300
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> > We have two cases in code:
> > 
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-gemini.c:       if (likely(IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)))
> > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c:     if (likely(IS_ERR(shadow) && PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)) {
> > 
> > The first one is mistake, I think. Or do we expect rtc_device_register()
> > to fail?
> > 
> > The second is redundant. "if (PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)" should do the
> > job.
> > 
> 
> Yep, those look like bugs to me.

Yeah, I have fixed both of them :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web