Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1173829 > unrolled thread

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

Started byRichard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
First post2015-06-29 16:20 +0200
Last post2015-06-30 03:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 16:20 +0200
    Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
        Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 "chunshan.zhu" <chunshan.zhu@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 03:10 +0200

#1173829 — Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

FromRichard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Date2015-06-29 16:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2
Message-ID<pGI4G-5o7-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Greg,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
> with things at the moment.
>
> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
> to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
> world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
> request for the next release cycle.

I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
have a question.
Where does all the development happen?

For example your current tree contains the following commit:

commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200

    kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation

    The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
    supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
    do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
    KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.

    Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
    Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>

Where was this patch posted to? Do you have mailinglist where one can follow the
discussions? As it carries an ACK there must be some review process.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1173905

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<pGJtM-7jc-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1173829
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
> > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
> > with things at the moment.
> >
> > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
> > will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
> > seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
> > to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
> > testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
> > world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
> > optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
> > request for the next release cycle.
> 
> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
> have a question.
> Where does all the development happen?
> 
> For example your current tree contains the following commit:
> 
> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200
> 
>     kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation
> 
>     The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
>     supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
>     do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
>     KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>     Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
> 
> Where was this patch posted to?

There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list
with this patch in it, along with others.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1173909

FromRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<pGJtM-7jc-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1173905
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Greg,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
>>> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
>>> with things at the moment.
>>>
>>> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
>>> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
>>> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
>>> to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
>>> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
>>> world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
>>> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
>>> request for the next release cycle.
>>
>> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
>> have a question.
>> Where does all the development happen?
>>
>> For example your current tree contains the following commit:
>>
>> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
>> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>> Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200
>>
>>     kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation
>>
>>     The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
>>     supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
>>     do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
>>     KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>>     Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
>>
>> Where was this patch posted to?
> 
> There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list
> with this patch in it, along with others.

I saw the pull request on LKML but not the patch. That's why I'm asking. :)

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1174167

From"chunshan.zhu" <chunshan.zhu@gmail.com>
Date2015-06-30 03:10 +0200
Message-ID<pGSdH-3ix-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1173909
David's out tree modules kdbus tree


https://github.com/systemd/kdbus

On 06/29/2015 11:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Greg,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
>>>> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
>>>> with things at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
>>>> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
>>>> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
>>>> to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
>>>> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
>>>> world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
>>>> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
>>>> request for the next release cycle.
>>> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
>>> have a question.
>>> Where does all the development happen?
>>>
>>> For example your current tree contains the following commit:
>>>
>>> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
>>> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200
>>>
>>>      kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation
>>>
>>>      The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
>>>      supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
>>>      do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
>>>      KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>>>      Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
>>>
>>> Where was this patch posted to?
>> There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list
>> with this patch in it, along with others.
> I saw the pull request on LKML but not the patch. That's why I'm asking. :)
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web