Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

From	"chunshan.zhu" <chunshan.zhu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2
Date	2015-06-30 03:10 +0200
Message-ID	<pGSdH-3ix-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pFHu3-86c-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pGI4G-5o7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pGJtM-7jc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pGJtM-7jc-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

David's out tree modules kdbus tree


https://github.com/systemd/kdbus

On 06/29/2015 11:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Greg,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
>>>> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
>>>> with things at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
>>>> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
>>>> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
>>>> to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
>>>> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
>>>> world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
>>>> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
>>>> request for the next release cycle.
>>> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
>>> have a question.
>>> Where does all the development happen?
>>>
>>> For example your current tree contains the following commit:
>>>
>>> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
>>> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200
>>>
>>>      kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation
>>>
>>>      The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
>>>      supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
>>>      do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
>>>      KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>>>      Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
>>>
>>> Where was this patch posted to?
>> There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list
>> with this patch in it, along with others.
> I saw the pull request on LKML but not the patch. That's why I'm asking. :)
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 16:20 +0200
  Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
    Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-06-29 17:50 +0200
      Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 "chunshan.zhu" <chunshan.zhu@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 03:10 +0200

csiph-web