Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	rhkramer@gmail.com
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user, linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).
Date	Sun, 05 May 2019 14:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<xUo7T-jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<xUo7T-jf-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sun May 5 12:08:08 2019
Old-Return-Path	<rhkramer@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, CC_TOO_MANY=3, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-qk1-x742.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=fhuMdr4ue4iw0OKDysFq+M/gteJlPKUxyQ/+TugYxZc=; b=vJRd3MvwNmSOrCLcrDcIljtWX9H0ynnxZc4g+tPCp/jLIlqyMcdBXH33uMLzWuY1ku /nt2ZoGJ64nSeHp96eaIkwugNmtEytYWhNNLaP1VigR5MV4Oy7JxUs5MK9xI92EPb6ie YMEkPGHXDu9ksd82Ng1p54cO671m+1QoUDhOFpObvtgSxtYnP+oi5THC9XGZ85aavy22 xtT6WyV8TAG1nNFhTdG/37AJd5Bmc4Kn6q98SzjyojTXBZv3Wircu4XRSzbu4zIf39RL ufUWpeEWl5jFTp+fXV16uWDaT/wmgsyDnMQk0yzyVqV8ZZ71N7B3oa0TiJLScjW6Og9i Yc2g==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=fhuMdr4ue4iw0OKDysFq+M/gteJlPKUxyQ/+TugYxZc=; b=TswiYi9nqrhxswZLQ0b7pbgc2dNiCOV2tucLsEaSHmknj3jXm4r5dmZRXqMsB4OhDf IAG54pW9lzKG0kFRRtNSIAHOCiUdXng/2eEfKF8ker3H4UGAe09Ia22iPSnHE6loBDV0 rSgYzQhYtpbwBVONah2vujb+pUFhJdmFx7kuVJ4LyC6alDRp7rn/llG42VH7IDp6Cpl2 WmWZ9KJiKS6xq2I3wEcNuZ2ASuiUf0TYDT809dxUMWPJ6+ZyBY5oPu7vFVG0BMp9Y2Qf IeqvUJRQLRMnBnpoAqM1I1faZCWuhWYzOAjvBIi38opN7hMiNkBQH1i//NAQCidmDExW ptJg==
X-Gm-Message-State	APjAAAWth8NBd7p/N/4Vwqvu32ZaiHWaNOTEKmM/cKfo4Cd+rICwXn9J S5cyddA1YODxpBuPtXjrycI=
X-Google-SMTP-Source	APXvYqwMOMguo6xj2k36egfwJjuFFroW1TYees+7IQAUVkgp+24keO7Tz+fO1l7Wx+vzKBRUytOQqw==
X-Received	by 2002:a37:b7c1:: with SMTP id h184mr15125541qkf.153.1557058074003; Sun, 05 May 2019 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent	KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-5-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/748247
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201905050807.51462.rhkramer@gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	17
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-user@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@gmail.com>, mailinglists@mattcrews.com, jhasler@newsguy.com, scdbackup@gmx.net, richard@walnut.gen.nz, curty@free.fr, jmtd@debian.org, mick.crane@gmail.com, tomas@tuxteam.de, steve@einval.com, joe@jretrading.com, rms@gnu.org, esr@thyrsus.com
X-Original-Date	Sun, 5 May 2019 08:07:51 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<201905050807.51462.rhkramer@gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<60c1b08305c5326e3503f51d81622541@redchan.it>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:208202 linux.kernel:1743353

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sunday, May 05, 2019 12:51:15 AM vsnsdualce2@redchan.it wrote:
> Bar rules do not allow lawyers to serve under a non-lawyer
> in
> an organization, and the organization was essentially a pro-bono law
> firm
> (which really needed a attorney in it's ranks...)

That's interesting, but (off the point of this email exchange), it puzzles me 
-- many corporations headed by non-lawyers have lawyers on staff, so I'm 
guessing that the statement you made applies only to organizations like law 
firms, or, the lawyers on the staff of a non-law corporation are in something at 
least a little different than the normal employer / employee relationship.

(PS: I stand corrected on Kuhn being a lawyer -- thanks for the correction.)

Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
the original post -- was it really this widespread?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed). rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-05 14:10 +0200
  Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M.  Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed). Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2019-05-05 14:30 +0200

csiph-web