Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1743353 > unrolled thread

Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

Started byrhkramer@gmail.com
First post2019-05-05 14:10 +0200
Last post2019-05-05 14:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed). rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-05-05 14:10 +0200
    Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M.  Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed). Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2019-05-05 14:30 +0200

#1743353 — Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

Fromrhkramer@gmail.com
Date2019-05-05 14:10 +0200
SubjectRe: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).
Message-ID<xUo7T-jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sunday, May 05, 2019 12:51:15 AM vsnsdualce2@redchan.it wrote:
> Bar rules do not allow lawyers to serve under a non-lawyer
> in
> an organization, and the organization was essentially a pro-bono law
> firm
> (which really needed a attorney in it's ranks...)

That's interesting, but (off the point of this email exchange), it puzzles me 
-- many corporations headed by non-lawyers have lawyers on staff, so I'm 
guessing that the statement you made applies only to organizations like law 
firms, or, the lawyers on the staff of a non-law corporation are in something at 
least a little different than the normal employer / employee relationship.

(PS: I stand corrected on Kuhn being a lawyer -- thanks for the correction.)

Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
the original post -- was it really this widespread?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1743354 — Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).

FromSteve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
Date2019-05-05 14:30 +0200
SubjectRe: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).
Message-ID<xUorf-q4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1743353
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 08:07:51AM -0400, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
>
>Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
>the original post -- was it really this widespread?

It's just bullshit trolling. Multiple different From: addresses, all
sent via cock.li. Easily blocked/ignored.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
There's no sensation to compare with this
Suspended animation, A state of bliss

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web