Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1743261
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages() |
| Date | 2017-10-02 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uwfP9-ur-119@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uusQp-sS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uw3NV-4As-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwfP8-ur-99@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 02-10-17 10:20:37, Tahsin Erdogan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited doesn't really need mapping as well. All > > it needs is the inode and we already have it in callers. So would it > > make sense to refactor a bit further and make its argument an inode? > > My only concern is that, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() is an > exported function so changing its signature could potentially break > some drivers? All in-kernel drivers would have to be updated of course but exported symbols are not considered a stable API. It's not like we would want to change this for no good reason so the change should be done only if this makes sense in general. This is something for IO/FS guys to tell. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages() Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-09-28 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-10-02 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages() Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-10-02 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-10-02 22:50 +0200
csiph-web