Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1742415
| From | Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) |
| Date | 2017-09-30 02:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uvdvX-4Sy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uv5I6-83d-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <uv6ut-8Q-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > On 29/09/2017 17:47, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> Hello, all >> >> An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found >> that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge >> to find out the answer nor energy to implement it in some time. >> >> Is it possible to implement kvm-pv which allows kvm to run on >> the boxes without hardware virtualization support, so that >> qemu/kvm can be used on clouds such as aws, azure? > > No, please don't. :) Even Xen is moving from PV to PVH (paravirtualized > hardware with event channels, grant tables and the like, but still using > hardware extensions for MMU). > > Rather, cloud providers should help getting nested virtualization ready > for production use. At least for KVM it's not that far. > Although I'm not business man, I don't think the top cloud provider[s] would allow nested virtualization, however mature nested virtualization is. Even xen-pv is unable to be nested in the aws and azure. Thanks, Lai >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 17:50 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-29 18:40 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 02:10 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-30 05:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com> - 2017-10-02 12:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-10-02 14:20 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) George Dunlap <dunlapg@umich.edu> - 2017-10-02 12:20 +0200
csiph-web