Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1742214
| From | Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) |
| Date | 2017-09-29 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uv5I6-83d-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, all An interesting (at least to me) thinking came up to me when I found that the lguest was removed. But I don't have enough knowledge to find out the answer nor energy to implement it in some time. Is it possible to implement kvm-pv which allows kvm to run on the boxes without hardware virtualization support, so that qemu/kvm can be used on clouds such as aws, azure? Without hardware virtualization support, the host kvm-pv module and the guest linux kernel need to cooperate in some ways. And some kvm facilities can help. For instance, the existing shadow-paging, which was not introduced when lguest had been added to kernel, could be reused to help on mmu virtualization. For guest kernel/userspace separation in x86_64, the intel cpu's segment registers can help too. (or use a new set of page-table for the guest kernel on amd64). The thought is quite shallow, but I hope this email brings some inspirations rather than annoyance. And I'm sorry if the later things would happen. Thanks, Lai. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote: > Lguest seems to be rather unused these days. It has seen only patches > ensuring it still builds the last two years and its official state is > "Odd Fixes". > > Nuke it in order to be able to clean up the paravirt code.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 17:50 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-29 18:40 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 02:10 +0200
Re: KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-30 05:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com> - 2017-10-02 12:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-10-02 14:20 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] KVM PV (was: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/lguest: remove lguest support) George Dunlap <dunlapg@umich.edu> - 2017-10-02 12:20 +0200
csiph-web