Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1740836
| From | gengdongjiu <gengdj.1984@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: allow get exception information from userspace |
| Date | 2017-09-27 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uumBj-4YL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <upar8-4lj-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <upC42-5rQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <us4yR-6pb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uszt0-8us-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuixH-1FJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> What you may be seeing is some awkwardness with the change in the SError ESR >> with v8.2. Previously the VSE mechanism injected an impdef SError, (but they >> were all impdef so it didn't matter). >> With VSESR_EL2 KVM has to specify one, and all-zeros is a bad choice as this >> means 'classified as a RAS error ... unknown!'. >> >> I have a patch in the upcoming SError/RAS series that changes KVMs virtual-abort >> code to specify an impdef ESR for this path. > Before I remember Marc and you suggest me specify the an impdef ESR (set the vsesr_el2) in > the userspace, I pasted Marc's propose and your suggestion that set VSESR_EL2(specify virtual SError syndrome) by the user space. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/441 https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/516 > now do you want to specify an impdef ESR in KVM instead of usrspace? > if setting the vsesr_el2 in the KVM, whether user-space need to specify? > May be we can combine the patches that specify an impdef ESR(set vsesr_el2) patch to one. >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: allow get exception information from userspace gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-27 13:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: allow get exception information from userspace gengdongjiu <gengdj.1984@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:40 +0200
csiph-web