Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1738833
| From | Shivasharan Srikanteshwara <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion |
| Date | 2017-09-25 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utxfr-3VY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <upRmp-6R3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uq3dT-6zx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ur602-7Z6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <ur75L-b2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 9:52 PM > To: Shivasharan Srikanteshwara > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; shuwang@redhat.com; Kashyap Desai; Sumit Saxena; > jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; > PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; chuhu@redhat.com; yizhan@redhat.com; > catalin.marinas@arm.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion > > Oh, I missed log_to_span. Well, in that case log_to_span is _the_ candidate > for moving into a separate allocation. > > And in fact you're probably better off by using a sensible data structure for it, > e.g. a radix tree. Thanks Christoph. We will make the changes suggested in phased approach. First we will fix kmemleak false positives by moving log_to_span allocation separate from fusion_context. The data structure change would involve major changes which affects IO path as well. Also driver expects log_to_span and other data structures to be available at load time itself. Considering this, we need to understand if radix tree would be a good choice for the change. Based on internal discussions, we see other similar arrays in driver code that we can change similarly eg. load_balance_info. This is definitely something to add to our to-do lists. These changes need to go through our internal regression test cycle and then submit it to upstream. Best regards, Shivasharan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion shuwang@redhat.com - 2017-09-15 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-09-15 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> - 2017-09-15 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-15 20:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Shivasharan Srikanteshwara <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com> - 2017-09-18 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-18 18:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH V2] megaraid: kmemleak: Track page allocation for fusion Shivasharan Srikanteshwara <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com> - 2017-09-25 10:50 +0200
csiph-web