Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1736530
| From | Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as a helper |
| Date | 2017-09-21 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <us7dn-8hx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <urmxP-1Xm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 19/09/17 09:52, Huacai Chen wrote:
> We will use device_is_coherent() as a helper function, which will be
> used in the next patch.
>
> There is a MIPS-specific plat_device_is_coherent(), but we need a more
> generic solution, so add and use a new function pointer in dma_map_ops.
I think we're heading in the right direction with the series, but I
still don't like this patch. I can pretty much guarantee that driver
authors *will* abuse a generic device_is_coherent() API to mean "I can
skip other DMA API calls and just use virt_to_phys()".
I think it would be far better to allow architectures to provide their
own override of dma_get_cache_alignment(), and let the coherency detail
remain internal to the relevant arch implementations.
[...]
> @@ -697,6 +698,15 @@ static inline void *dma_zalloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA
> +static inline int device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> + if (ops && ops->device_is_coherent)
> + return ops->device_is_coherent(dev);
> + else
> + return 1; /* compatible behavior */
That is also quite scary - if someone now adds a new
dma_get_cache_alignemnt() call and dutifully passes a non-NULL device,
they will now get back an alignment of 1 on all non-coherent platforms
except MIPS: hello data corruption.
Robin.
> +}
> +
> static inline int dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
> {
> #ifdef ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as a helper Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-19 11:00 +0200
[PATCH V6 2/3] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() function Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-19 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() function Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-09-19 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()function "陈华才" <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-21 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()function Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-09-21 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as a helper Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-09-21 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as ahelper "陈华才" <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-22 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as ahelper Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-09-22 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dma-mapping: Introduce device_is_coherent() as ahelper Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-09-22 15:50 +0200
csiph-web