Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901

From	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901
Date	2017-09-19 00:20 +0200
Message-ID	<urcyu-41P-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <un7H3-2qi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <upYHg-3ie-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uqTvP-7Fn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uqZrA-3BU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <urcoO-3Yv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue 2017-09-19 08:00:10, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:11:09 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, rest of the world can reproduce the error, and it means
> > linux-next is useless for us.
> > 
> > I'd expect you to drop the relevant tree from linux-next when the
> > error was reported. Clearly, those patches are unsuitable for 4.15, as
> > they are broken, so they should not be in linux-next.
> 
> Andrew has asked me to drop the patches from linux-next today and I
> have done so.

Thanks!
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-15 15:20 +0200
  Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-18 04:00 +0200
    Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-18 10:20 +0200
      Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-09-19 00:10 +0200
        Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-19 00:20 +0200

csiph-web