Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1734506
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 |
| Date | 2017-09-19 00:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <urcoO-3Yv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <umZq9-5em-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <un7H3-2qi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <upYHg-3ie-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uqTvP-7Fn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uqZrA-3BU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Pavel, On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:11:09 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > Unfortunately, rest of the world can reproduce the error, and it means > linux-next is useless for us. > > I'd expect you to drop the relevant tree from linux-next when the > error was reported. Clearly, those patches are unsuitable for 4.15, as > they are broken, so they should not be in linux-next. Andrew has asked me to drop the patches from linux-next today and I have done so. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-15 15:20 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-18 04:00 +0200
Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-18 10:20 +0200
Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-09-19 00:10 +0200
Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-09-19 00:20 +0200
csiph-web