Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1736278

Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/20/2017 05:09 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>> I think the only thing that will really help here is if you batch the
>> allocations.  For instance, you could make sure that the per-cpu-pageset
>> lists always contain either all kernel or all user data.  Then remap the
>> entire list at once and do a single flush after the entire list is consumed.
> Just so I understand, the idea would be that we only flush when the
> type of allocation alternates, so:
> 
> kmalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL);
> kmalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL);
> /* remap+flush here */
> kmalloc(..., GFP_HIGHUSER);
> /* remap+flush here */
> kmalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL);

Not really.  We keep a free list per migrate type, and a per_cpu_pages
(pcp) list per migratetype:

> struct per_cpu_pages {
>         int count;              /* number of pages in the list */
>         int high;               /* high watermark, emptying needed */
>         int batch;              /* chunk size for buddy add/remove */
> 
>         /* Lists of pages, one per migrate type stored on the pcp-lists */
>         struct list_head lists[MIGRATE_PCPTYPES];
> };

The migratetype is derived from the GFP flags in
gfpflags_to_migratetype().  In general, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_KERNEL come
from different migratetypes, so they come from different free lists.

In your case above, the GFP_HIGHUSER allocation come through the
MIGRATE_MOVABLE pcp list while the GFP_KERNEL ones come from the
MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE one.  Since we add a bunch of pages to those lists at
once, you could do all the mapping/unmapping/flushing on a bunch of
pages at once

Or, you could hook your code into the places where the migratetype of
memory is changed (set_pageblock_migratetype(), plus where we fall
back).  Those changes are much more rare than page allocation.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-09-20 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> - 2017-09-21 00:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-09-21 01:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> - 2017-09-21 02:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-09-21 02:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame  Ownership (XPFO) Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> - 2017-09-21 03:40 +0200

csiph-web