Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1733941

Re: [V5, 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in non-coherent DMA mode

From Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [V5, 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in non-coherent DMA mode
Date 2017-09-18 11:50 +0200
Message-ID <ur0QG-4nB-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uqVR0-Xl-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 18/09/17 05:22, Huacai Chen wrote:
> In non-coherent DMA mode, kernel uses cache flushing operations to
> maintain I/O coherency, so the dmapool objects should be aligned to
> ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Otherwise, it will cause data corruption, at least
> on MIPS:
> 
> 	Step 1, dma_map_single
> 	Step 2, cache_invalidate (no writeback)
> 	Step 3, dma_from_device
> 	Step 4, dma_unmap_single

This is a massive red warning flag for the whole series, because DMA
pools don't work like that. At best, this will do nothing, and at worst
it is papering over egregious bugs elsewhere. Streaming mappings of
coherent allocations means completely broken code.

> If a DMA buffer and a kernel structure share a same cache line, and if
> the kernel structure has dirty data, cache_invalidate (no writeback)
> will cause data lost.

DMA pools are backed by coherent allocations, and those should already
be at *page* granularity, so this doubly cannot happen for correct code.

More generally, the whole point of having the DMA APIs is that drivers
and subsystems should not have to be aware of details like hardware
coherency. Besides, cache line sharing that could pose a correctness
issue for non-hardware-coherent systems could still be a performance
issue in the presence of hardware coherency (due to unnecessary line
migration), so there's still an argument for not treating them differently.

Robin.

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
> ---
>  mm/dmapool.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
> index 4d90a64..6263905 100644
> --- a/mm/dmapool.c
> +++ b/mm/dmapool.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct device *dev,
>  	else if (align & (align - 1))
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	if (!device_is_coherent(dev))
> +		align = max_t(size_t, align, dma_get_cache_alignment());
> +
>  	if (size == 0)
>  		return NULL;
>  	else if (size < 4)
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V5 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in non-coherent DMA mode Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-18 06:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in  non-coherent DMA mode Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-18 07:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN innon-coherent DMA mode "陈华才" <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-18 09:00 +0200
  Re: [V5, 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in non-coherent  DMA mode Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2017-09-18 11:50 +0200
    Re: [V5, 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in  non-coherent DMA mode Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-18 18:00 +0200
      Re: [V5, 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN innon-coherent DMA mode "陈华才" <chenhc@lemote.com> - 2017-09-19 04:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] mm: dmapool: Align to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in  non-coherent DMA mode Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-18 17:50 +0200

csiph-web