Re: n900 in next-20170901

From	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: n900 in next-20170901
Date	2017-09-18 04:10 +0200
Message-ID	<uqTFw-7Yr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <umsue-7B9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umvBL-1gv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umIIF-2qh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <umZq9-5em-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <upYQW-3nL-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 03:28:44PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2017 16:30:38 Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > If it doesn't help, is there a way to test n900 configuration in QEMU?
> 
> Hi Joonsoo, linaro version of QEMU has support for n900 machine. For
> more information how to prepare & run kernel image see this email:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/200171.html
> (instead u-boot.bin you would supply kernel's zImage)

I tried to search to download required tools but cannot find a qflasher.
Looks like you have qflasher and other *.bin for n900 image.
Could you share them to me, please?

> But QEMU does not support HS mode, so there is probably no secure ram.
> IIRC smc instructions should not be used in normal GP mode.

Okay. Thanks for information. I'm not sure that I can regenerate the
error with n900 QEMU emulation but that would be my best so I will
try.

Thanks.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-09-15 15:30 +0200
  Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-18 04:10 +0200

csiph-web