Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732884
| From | Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: n900 in next-20170901 |
| Date | 2017-09-15 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <upYQW-3nL-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ulJQt-4xO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <umsue-7B9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umvBL-1gv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umIIF-2qh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <umZq9-5em-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday 07 September 2017 16:30:38 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > If it doesn't help, is there a way to test n900 configuration in QEMU? Hi Joonsoo, linaro version of QEMU has support for n900 machine. For more information how to prepare & run kernel image see this email: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/200171.html (instead u-boot.bin you would supply kernel's zImage) But QEMU does not support HS mode, so there is probably no secure ram. IIRC smc instructions should not be used in normal GP mode. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-09-15 15:30 +0200 Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-18 04:10 +0200
csiph-web