Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1732884

Re: n900 in next-20170901

From Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: n900 in next-20170901
Date 2017-09-15 15:30 +0200
Message-ID <upYQW-3nL-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ulJQt-4xO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <umsue-7B9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umvBL-1gv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umIIF-2qh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <umZq9-5em-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday 07 September 2017 16:30:38 Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> If it doesn't help, is there a way to test n900 configuration in QEMU?

Hi Joonsoo, linaro version of QEMU has support for n900 machine. For
more information how to prepare & run kernel image see this email:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/200171.html
(instead u-boot.bin you would supply kernel's zImage)

But QEMU does not support HS mode, so there is probably no secure ram.
IIRC smc instructions should not be used in normal GP mode.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: n900 in next-20170901 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2017-09-15 15:30 +0200
  Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-18 04:10 +0200

csiph-web