Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732489
| From | "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: slab: output reclaimable flag in /proc/slabinfo |
| Date | 2017-09-14 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <upGAG-88i-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <upFXY-7Vl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <upFXY-7Vl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <upG7E-7Yy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 9/14/17 10:27 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote: > Well /proc/slabinfo is a legacy interface. The infomation if a slab is > reclaimable is available via the slabinfo tool. We would break a format > that is relied upon by numerous tools. Thanks for pointing this out. It would be unacceptable if it would break the backward compatibility. A follow-up question is do we know what tools rely on the slabinfo format? From my point of view, although /proc/slabinfo is legacy, it sounds it is still used very often by the users. Thanks, Yang >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message when kernel panic "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-09-14 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 1/3] mm: slab: output reclaimable flag in /proc/slabinfo "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-09-14 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: slab: output reclaimable flag in /proc/slabinfo Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-09-14 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: slab: output reclaimable flag in /proc/slabinfo "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-09-14 20:00 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] tools: slabinfo: add "-U" option to show unreclaimable slabs only "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-09-14 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] tools: slabinfo: add "-U" option to show unreclaimable slabs only Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-09-14 19:30 +0200
csiph-web