Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1721909
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error |
| Date | 2017-08-28 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ujxJM-13g-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <ujvRD-8lV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujw1k-8pb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujw1l-8pb-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujwkG-8vp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujwXo-vG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 08:44:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> For my opinion, since you asked, the either case needs a comment on >> top of that additional check. > > That's because the comment belongs to the v2 part of the check. > >> Separate conditionals in independent cases are, of course, better. > > Yes, and separate are easier to read if you read them like this: > > + if (rc == -ENOENT) > + return rc; > > <--- Ok, we got the missing entry out of the way, now, here, we have a > valid entry. Now we can concentrate on processing it further. > > ... other check and ack and ... > > And this becomes a lot more natural when you're staring at a big function > which does a lot of things and you concentrate only on the main path. > > Oh, and this is how those checks get translated to asm as there you > don't really have compound if-statements. So if you switch your mind to > reading such checks separately, you're practically ready to read their > asm translation too... > > Anyway, this is how I see it. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > -- -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-28 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-28 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-08-28 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-08-28 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-08-28 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V3] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-08-29 10:20 +0200
csiph-web