Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1716530

Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:10:05 +0200
Message-ID <ugVyZ-5o7-71@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ufX9L-Un-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ufX9M-Un-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1503324178; bh=KdJsclzRdGWQgriRI7DeFF7cDYXAwlOp++6lClZXJaw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RxhBUVHlhBD/zKx3+ShDD7zNQdVp+51IHKIRtTIKUC6risKpUG5DPQ23yy8wQ+SMZ +SsR6or8F/pnjlFp96BLSV5zG1J9+ibB7b63NKtqUJ7m4Ean2a/5dsrfcq6lQgvxDG VyqmMMNFqBITxMoFOOQcn1Yqbdsa2FNSZvr4Y6Bk=
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1503324177; bh=KdJsclzRdGWQgriRI7DeFF7cDYXAwlOp++6lClZXJaw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fr6yk3VePTMAo7khKGxAjItTLcV3AmYcwdD1g8mXpPUMfLGdmZGuGoMRqB27MNqTk SsRStmUjk2MQL6O+sMMZ0+8sWLN8VzD5mpK2Ui5uIEdbPe0t8VWL6SCBPlQcVmbjOr OWYyUJhjEgmX8yVp9BItDn/KDYlPEvBLaKquesgo=
Dmarc-Filter OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C2A8D60376
Authentication-Results pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org
Authentication-Results pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 73
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
X-Original-Date Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:02:55 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <f7127748-24cd-37bd-544a-8cba6bf5906d@codeaurora.org>
X-Original-References <20170818212310.15145.21732.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20170818213203.15145.36487.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1716530

Show key headers only | View raw


On 8/18/2017 5:32 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> While waiting for a device to become ready (i.e., to return a non-CRS
> completion to a read of its Vendor ID), if we got a valid response to the
> very last read before timing out, we printed a warning and gave up on the
> device even though it was actually ready.
> 
> For a typical 60s timeout, we wait about 65s (it's not exact because of the
> exponential backoff), but we treated devices that became ready between 33s
> and 65s as though they failed.
> 
> Move the Device ID read later so we check whether the device is ready
> immediately, before checking for a timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c |    7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index c31310db0404..08ea844ac4ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1849,15 +1849,16 @@ bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
>  
>  		msleep(delay);
>  		delay *= 2;
> -		if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
> -			return false;
> -		/* Card hasn't responded in 60 seconds?  Must be stuck. */
> +

There is still a problem here. We'll wait some time above and return without checking if
we actually found the card or not.

>  		if (delay > crs_timeout) {
>  			printk(KERN_WARNING "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: not responding\n",
>  			       pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
>  			       PCI_FUNC(devfn));
>  			return false;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
> +			return false;
>  	}
>  
>  	return true;
> 
> 

Here is another shot at it. Sorry, I don't have a diff syntax. I made up the function
by copy paste.

	while ((*l & 0xffff) == 0x0001) {
		if (!crs_timeout)
			return false;
 
		/* Card hasn't responded in 60 seconds?  Must be stuck. */
		if (delay > crs_timeout) {
			printk(KERN_WARNING "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: not responding\n",
			       pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
			       PCI_FUNC(devfn));
			return false;
		} 
		msleep(delay);
		delay *= 2;
		if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
			return false; 
	}

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> - 2017-08-18 23:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS  timeout Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-21 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS  timeout Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-08-21 19:50 +0200

csiph-web