RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage

From	Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage
Date	2017-08-14 20:40 +0200
Message-ID	<uesro-7E5-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<udnWN-7ym-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uerbZ-6WD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uervk-72Y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uerYm-7s4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <ues81-7vo-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, August 14, 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > However, now with your mkcramfs tool, I can no longer mount my cramfs
> > image as the rootfs on boot. I was able to do that before (ie, 30
> minutes
> > ago) when using the community mkcramfs (ie, 30 minutes ago).
> >
> > I get this:
> >
> > [    1.712425] cramfs: checking physical address 0x1b000000 for linear
> cramfs image
> > [    1.720531] cramfs: linear cramfs image appears to be 15744 KB in
> size
> > [    1.728656] VFS: Mounted root (cramfs_physmem filesystem) readonly on
> device 0:12.
> > [    1.737062] devtmpfs: mounted
> > [    1.741139] Freeing unused kernel memory: 48K
> > [    1.745545] This architecture does not have kernel memory protection.
> > [    1.760381] Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it
> (error -22)
> > [    1.769685] Starting init: /bin/sh exists but couldn't execute it
> (error -14)
> 
> Is /sbin/init a link to busybox?

Yes.


> I suppose it just boots if you do mkcramfs without -X?

Correct. I just created another image and removed the "-X -X" when 
creating it. Now I can boot that image as my rootfs.
  (I'm using -X -X because I'm using a Cortex-A9 with MMU).


> If so could you share your non-working cramfs image with me?

I will send it (in a separate email)



Chris

Thread

RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 19:20 +0200
  RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 19:40 +0200
    RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:10 +0200
      RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 20:20 +0200
        RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:40 +0200
          RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-15 06:20 +0200
            RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-15 13:10 +0200
              RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 07:20 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 13:10 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 16:30 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 17:20 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-17 03:20 +0200

csiph-web