Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1711266

RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage

From Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage
Date 2017-08-14 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <uerbZ-6WD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <udnWN-7ym-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday, August 11, 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This series brings a nice refresh to the cramfs filesystem, adding the
> following capabilities:
> 
> - Direct memory access, bypassing the block and/or MTD layers entirely.
> 
> - Ability to store individual data blocks uncompressed.
> 
> - Ability to locate individual data blocks anywhere in the filesystem.
> 
> The end result is a very tight filesystem that can be accessed directly
> from ROM without any other subsystem underneath. Also this allows for
> user space XIP which is a very important feature for tiny embedded
> systems.



I just applied the patches tried this simple test:
 - tested with a Renesas RZ/A1 (Cortex-A9...so it has an MMU).
 - I set the sticky bit for busybox before using mkcramfs
 - booted (with squashfs) and mounted the cramfs image
 - confirmed that the sticky bit was still set on busybox
 - was able to execute busybox in the cramfs image


However, at this point I'm not sure how I can confirm that the XIP 
busybox actually executed as XIP or not.


Chris

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 19:20 +0200
  RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 19:40 +0200
    RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:10 +0200
      RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 20:20 +0200
        RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:40 +0200
          RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-15 06:20 +0200
            RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-15 13:10 +0200
              RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 07:20 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 13:10 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 16:30 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 17:20 +0200
                RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-17 03:20 +0200

csiph-web