Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1711266
| From | Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage |
| Date | 2017-08-14 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uerbZ-6WD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <udnWN-7ym-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday, August 11, 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > This series brings a nice refresh to the cramfs filesystem, adding the > following capabilities: > > - Direct memory access, bypassing the block and/or MTD layers entirely. > > - Ability to store individual data blocks uncompressed. > > - Ability to locate individual data blocks anywhere in the filesystem. > > The end result is a very tight filesystem that can be accessed directly > from ROM without any other subsystem underneath. Also this allows for > user space XIP which is a very important feature for tiny embedded > systems. I just applied the patches tried this simple test: - tested with a Renesas RZ/A1 (Cortex-A9...so it has an MMU). - I set the sticky bit for busybox before using mkcramfs - booted (with squashfs) and mounted the cramfs image - confirmed that the sticky bit was still set on busybox - was able to execute busybox in the cramfs image However, at this point I'm not sure how I can confirm that the XIP busybox actually executed as XIP or not. Chris
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 19:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 19:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-14 20:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-14 20:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-15 06:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-15 13:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 07:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 13:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-16 16:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> - 2017-08-16 17:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 0/5] cramfs refresh for embedded usage Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-17 03:20 +0200
csiph-web