Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1710592
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] mm: refactoring TLB gathering API |
| Date | 2017-08-14 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uebJT-5EW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u9Wq6-6U6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9Wq7-6U6-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeqt-1IZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <udlLj-6j5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:12:45AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > >> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> > >> > >> This patch is a preparatory patch for solving race problems caused by > >> TLB batch. For that, we will increase/decrease TLB flush pending count > >> of mm_struct whenever tlb_[gather|finish]_mmu is called. > >> > >> Before making it simple, this patch separates architecture specific > >> part and rename it to arch_tlb_[gather|finish]_mmu and generic part > >> just calls it. > > > > I absolutely hate this. We should unify this stuff, not diverge it > > further. > > Agreed, but I don’t see how this patch makes the situation any worse. Agree with Nadav. I don't think this patch makes things diverge further. Peter, If you are strong against of it, please tell us what part you are hating.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] mm: refactoring TLB gathering API Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-08-14 02:50 +0200
csiph-web