Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1709442
| From | Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 |
| Date | 2017-08-11 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <udfcR-2eO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ud25X-2iy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeqt-1IZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeqt-1IZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeAa-1Md-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11 August 2017 at 10:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ard Biesheuvel > <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 11 August 2017 at 10:22, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:13:22PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: >>>> Fedora rawhide recently upgraded to binutils 2.29 and this seems >>>> to produce new warnings: >>>> >>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h: Assembler messages: >>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h:125: Warning: ignoring attempt to redefine built-in register 'lr' >>>> >>>> This is >>>> >>>> /* >>>> * Register aliases. >>>> */ >>>> lr .req x30 // link register >>> >>> Strange, does gas now think 'lr' is a general purpose register (aliased >>> to x30)? It never was and IIRC the toolchain people many years ago >>> refused to add it, hence the alias above in the kernel. I wonder if they >>> added 'fp' as well... >>> >>> We could remove the alias and replace all 'lr' instances with 'x30' >>> throughout the kernel (no too many) or we add some #ifdef around the >>> above based on the binutils version. >>> >> >> This is annoying. Replacing x30 with lr achieves the opposite of the Of course, I meant replacing lr with x30 in our code. >> intent of the binutils change. And using #ifdefs is inaccurate, >> because you can't really test the binutils version only the GCC >> version, and those are not tightly coupled. >> >> Can you .unreq it? > > adding the author of the change to cc > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=62e20ed45e3da5f3ba695e4ee109317668180fe6 > > There probably was some reasoning behind the change and an > intended method for using it. > > Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-08-10 22:20 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-08-11 11:30 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-08-11 11:40 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-08-11 12:20 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-08-11 11:30 +0200
csiph-web