Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1709409
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 |
| Date | 2017-08-11 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <udeAa-1Md-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ud25X-2iy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeqt-1IZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <udeqt-1IZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 11 August 2017 at 10:22, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:13:22PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> Fedora rawhide recently upgraded to binutils 2.29 and this seems
>>> to produce new warnings:
>>>
>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h: Assembler messages:
>>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h:125: Warning: ignoring attempt to redefine built-in register 'lr'
>>>
>>> This is
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Register aliases.
>>> */
>>> lr .req x30 // link register
>>
>> Strange, does gas now think 'lr' is a general purpose register (aliased
>> to x30)? It never was and IIRC the toolchain people many years ago
>> refused to add it, hence the alias above in the kernel. I wonder if they
>> added 'fp' as well...
>>
>> We could remove the alias and replace all 'lr' instances with 'x30'
>> throughout the kernel (no too many) or we add some #ifdef around the
>> above based on the binutils version.
>>
>
> This is annoying. Replacing x30 with lr achieves the opposite of the
> intent of the binutils change. And using #ifdefs is inaccurate,
> because you can't really test the binutils version only the GCC
> version, and those are not tightly coupled.
>
> Can you .unreq it?
adding the author of the change to cc
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=62e20ed45e3da5f3ba695e4ee109317668180fe6
There probably was some reasoning behind the change and an
intended method for using it.
Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-08-10 22:20 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-08-11 11:30 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-08-11 11:40 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-08-11 12:20 +0200
Re: New assembler warnings with binutils 2.29 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-08-11 11:30 +0200
csiph-web